Jump to content

Which team is the most Uncertain in 22-4A

Htexans90

By Htexans90
in SETXsports Archived Threads

 Share

Which team has the broadest margin for greatness and mediocraty (which team has the most questions around it)?  

53 members have voted

  1. 1. Which team has the broadest margin for greatness and mediocraty (which team has the most questions around it)?

    • Dayton
      3
    • Central
      2
    • Nederland
      6
    • LCM
      8
    • PNG
      11
    • Ozen
      6
    • Lumberton
      9
    • Vidor
      8

Recommended Posts

Wise Guy

Wise Guy

Posted
Posted

Ozen was once a 20-4A powerhouse, but struggeld in the newly formed District 22-4a. It will be interesting to see how they will fair in the district race, and I am pretty sure they will do more damage this year than last year.

LCM and PNG have alot to prove this year, but in two different perspectives. LCM has got themselves a fairly new captain (Moody) that has supposedly been righting the ship, but the Battlin Bears have gone 0-2 out of the box. And PNG was boasting one of the area's best backfields coming into 07, but has yet to put a single point on the board.

QB tends to be the area in question with 22-4A front runners. Central has a new QB in Hobbs, who is taking his lumps in non districct play, but has the help of stud RB Derrick Hall and WR Spikes. Nederland is going into their second game with their newly acclomated field general, Kirby Bellow, who threw for 4 TD's, but with less than a 50% completion rate. Dayton will be galloping into their first match-up without their heralded Cody Green, and Dugat assumes the role of QB.

I just don't see Lumberton making much noise at all, and Vidor will more than likely be trampled on by everyone in the district.

This year in District 22-4A, it is going to be anyone's ball game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest 87CRU79

Guest 87CRU79

Posted
Posted

I think that Ozen will do alot better than last season, and no one should take them lightly. I am very intrigued to see how LCM and LUmberton do this year. It has been interesting with the lack of hype from Lumberton this year, but I suppose that LCM and Vidor have picked up the slack on that one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bronco1

bronco1

Posted
Posted

I picked PN-G, they have played 2 good schools this year and kept them to relatively low scores. The problem may be offense, but against weaker defenses they may fair well. Another problem for them is they won't be facing any weak defense to speak of, over all PN-G could make a run if their offense comes around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
scout.com

scout.com

Posted
Posted

LC-M is really smart cause their head coach (Moody) wants people to think that LC-M is not good.They was just tring some crazy plays against the two teams that went to the playoffs last year.

And everyone got to give it to LC-M CAUSE THEY WAS THE ONLY TEAM WHO KELP WOS TO 6 points in a long time.Plus salter was playing hurt.

I wonder if salter is goin to set out this game?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Separation Scientist
      West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin leaves Democratic Party, registers as independent

      By Separation Scientist · Posted

      Exactly Lum. Right is still right regardless which way the wind blows. 
    • PhatMack19
      Road to Omaha

      By PhatMack19 · Posted

      High Point walks it off.  Vandy Whistler headed home!
    • Separation Scientist
      Bridgeland vs Tomball

      By Separation Scientist · Posted

      Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • UT alum
      America lost. The Kangaroo Court won.

      By UT alum · Posted

    • CardinalBacker
      America lost. The Kangaroo Court won.

      By CardinalBacker · Posted

      My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...