Jump to content

Beaumont United 45 Baytown Sterling 0/FINAL


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

My general assessment is that the Timberwolves did what they were supposed to do, beat the team in front of them which was no doubt a lesser opponent.  

The Wolf defense picked up where they left off from 2 weeks ago.  Coming into last night's game, all I heard was about Sterlings RB Hill having over 2,300 total yards last year.  Well the defense held him to around 20 yards the entire game in my estimation.  The defense held the Sterling offense to if I recall correctly, 1 first down in the 1st half and maybe a total of 5 for the entire game.  10 points in 2 games given up since switching from the 4-3 to a 3-4 scheme and moving a few kids around.  No turnovers created by the defense last night but the defense came out of the game healthy going into next weeks match up.  

Now to the offense.  6 TD's were scored last night but one was a punt return and the other was a kickoff return.  So 28 points by the offense was a ok start and something to build on but could have been a lot more but I understand that there was no need to pile it on and show too much going into next weeks match up.  3 TD's were passing (43,5,10) and one running (24).  QB seemed to make some good decisions and good throws at times but every now and then it seemed predetermined and forced which luckily didn't result in a turnover.  He will be fine.  O-line didn't give up a sack that I can recall but it seems like something is lacking in the run game blocking.  They are using a RB by committee because to me it seems as though nobody has established themselves "as the man" in the backfield.  The potential is there though.  A few drops by the WR's but not many and luckily this wasn't a game where it could come back to haunt us.  No turnovers last night by the offense but there will be a few guys getting treatment this morning.

Like I said earlier, the Wolves, coaches and players, did what they were supposed to do last night, they got the first win in United football history.  It was also a good confidence booster for the team as a whole going into next weeks rivalry game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
    • Classic Bridge City.  Always someone else's fault, refs/umpires cheated, AD with an agenda, yada, yada, yada.  As far as I can tell it's damn near impossible to get fired at these schools so when someone does get fired, it's usually something.  Drama at Bridge City is a constant.  The guy did a good job coaching basketball and I'm sure he'll continue that somewhere else.  Time to move on.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...