Jump to content

Rivalry Renewed - Bowl Edition?


TxHoops

Recommended Posts

Looks like it will not happen. We shall see if Chip is correct.

 

http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/11/19/report-sec-am-would-nix-bowl-game-vs-texas/

So now if it does not happen it is ONLY because A&M and the SEC are scared of Texas  :unsure: - and this information comes from a Texas source and of course that is NEVER anti-A&M  :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So now if it does not happen it is ONLY because A&M and the SEC are scared of Texas  :unsure: - and this information comes from a Texas source and of course that is NEVER anti-A&M  :rolleyes:

 

Do you think losing to UT AGAIN would help the aggies cause?

 

The report does say that the SEC is against the game NOT the aggies. They are well aware of why UTAM in in their conference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So now if it does not happen it is ONLY because A&M and the SEC are scared of Texas :unsure: - and this information comes from a Texas source and of course that is NEVER anti-A&M :rolleyes:


I am guarded with Chip Brown reports. It's conjecture at best at this point. If his scenario comes to fruition, we will hear about it from sources other than a Longhorn beat writer. I would think there would be some disgruntled Texaa Bowl officials/sponsors who will be upset and talking due to lost revenue.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you think losing to UT AGAIN would help the aggies cause?

 

The report does say that the SEC is against the game NOT the aggies. They are well aware of why UTAM in in their conference.

DO You think that a loss to A&M would help Texas (Strong's) cause?  No - Texas would have a HUGE State wide setback if they lost to A&M - Strong does not need a loss to A&M in his first year.  

 

At this time either team (1) would benefit greatly from a win and (2) be equally adversely affected by a loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am guarded with Chip Brown reports. It's conjecture at best at this point. If his scenario comes to fruition, we will hear about it from sources other than a Longhorn beat writer. I would think there would be some disgruntled Texaa Bowl officials/sponsors who will be upset and talking due to lost revenue.

I agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DO You think that a loss to A&M would help Texas (Strong's) cause?  No - Texas would have a HUGE State wide setback if they lost to A&M - Strong does not need a loss to A&M in his first year.  

 

At this time either team (1) would benefit greatly from a win and (2) be equally adversely affected by a loss.

 

UTAM already WTS so what would UT lose? Some more 1 star recruits?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DO You think that a loss to A&M would help Texas (Strong's) cause? No - Texas would have a HUGE State wide setback if they lost to A&M - Strong does not need a loss to A&M in his first year.

At this time either team (1) would benefit greatly from a win and (2) be equally adversely affected by a loss.


A&M does have more to lose IMO. In addition, I would favor UT in that matchup. I know, I know, I'm biased. But although you guys don't know me, I generally don't drink the kool aid and would freely admit this is the first year since we last played that Texas wouldn't be a significant underdog. I read an article this morning about recruiting starting to swing back Texas' way in last several weeks and a loss by A&M could really swing the pendulum. Regardless, we will see what happens and we will likely know why whatever happens. I have a hard time criticizing A&M for such a decision, if Chip is right. After all, I believe the reason we are no longer playing anyway is due to Deloss.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A&M does have more to lose IMO. In addition, I would favor UT in that matchup. I know, I know, I'm biased. But although you guys don't know me, I generally don't drink the kool aid and would freely admit this is the first year since we last played that Texas wouldn't be a significant underdog. I read an article this morning about recruiting starting to swing back Texas' way in last several weeks and a loss by A&M could really swing the pendulum. Regardless, we will see what happens and we will likely know why whatever happens. I have a hard time criticizing A&M for such a decision, if Chip is right. After all, I believe the reason we are no longer playing anyway is due to Deloss.

At this time I really cannot argue that Texas might be the favorite - Texas defense likely makes the difference.  Allen and the offense has had times were he has looked real good - but at others has looked real bad.  However, the A&M defense has looked weak most of the season.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this time I really cannot argue that Texas might be the favorite - Texas defense likely makes the difference. Allen and the offense has had times were he has looked real good - but at others has looked real bad. However, the A&M defense has looked weak most of the season.


We seem to be playing at the same time a lot so I only get to see the Aggies during commercials. It looks to me like Allen is improving though - is this accurate in your opinion? In any event, he has a unique skill set few QBs have. And between Kyle and Hill, it's a no brainer to me who I would want leading my team. If Kyler Murray's commitment holds (and I expect it will), things will get interesting in a year or two.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And, btw, the "A&M has more to lose" reference was meant solely for recruiting. Obviously otherwise, any game both teams have the same thing at stake - a win or a loss and bragging rights. This was not meant as a jab at the Ags; it's actually a compliment. Texas almost always has more to lose in this respect any time they play a team they compete with in Texas. A&M, due to its recent recruiting success, would be the exception to the rule.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We seem to be playing at the same time a lot so I only get to see the Aggies during commercials. It looks to me like Allen is improving though - is this accurate in your opinion? In any event, he has a unique skill set few QBs have. And between Kyle and Hill, it's a no brainer to me who I would want leading my team. If Kyler Murray's commitment holds (and I expect it will), things will get interesting in a year or two.


I think Kyle is fine and has a bright future ahead of him. He seems to have earned the respect of the team which is huge for a freshman. Rumors are that Kenny never did.

The play calling has been horrendous though. I don't know if Spav's in over his head or what. He makes a lot of calls that leave you scratching your head. The offense doesn't get in a rhythm and thus the defense is on the field the whole game. A&M is better when their defense is as far away from the field as possible.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Kyle is fine and has a bright future ahead of him. He seems to have earned the respect of the team which is huge for a freshman. Rumors are that Kenny never did.

The play calling has been horrendous though. I don't know if Spav's in over his head or what. He makes a lot of calls that leave you scratching your head. The offense doesn't get in a rhythm and thus the defense is on the field the whole game. A&M is better when their defense is as far away from the field as possible.


I haven't seen enough of their games to comment on the offensive play calling. But I know you and some of my Aggie friends have not been thrilled with some of his play calling. I can relate because I often feel the same way (now and many, many times in the past) with our OCs. I would think that with the obvious glaring problems with Snyder's defense, he is benefitting in not being that awful. Couldn't agree more though with keeping that D off the field.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We seem to be playing at the same time a lot so I only get to see the Aggies during commercials. It looks to me like Allen is improving though - is this accurate in your opinion? In any event, he has a unique skill set few QBs have. And between Kyle and Hill, it's a no brainer to me who I would want leading my team. If Kyler Murray's commitment holds (and I expect it will), things will get interesting in a year or two.

I do agree that Allen has improved and looks to be a good QB for a while to come - But his main issue is the pressure that the O Line is allowing at this time as in many instances he has not time to go through his progressions and scrambling does not appear to be a trait that he has at this time.  The Murray issue is in my opinion a good one for Aggie's - the more talent at a position the more likelihood for success - hope he becomes an Aggie as I loved watching his dad play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,977
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined



  • Posts

    • We'll see. I don't trust us. 
    • Starting pitching has been shaky the last few weeks due to some injuries outside of Hagen Smith.  He goes tomorrow, so y’all should be fine 
    • Manchin may get it but any mention of the radical left that wanted to get rid of the filibuster and end almost 220 years of history because the Democrats are mad?  The House and Senate are obviously different legislative bodies with entirely different election processes and rules for a reason. The House can vote on laws with a simple majority vote. The Senate put rules in place that it would make it much tougher to pass laws. Laws should be difficult to pass. The Senate is often the holdup of the right and left. It takes 60 votes to break the filibuster so any law will almost certainly require agreement at least in part, from opposing sides of an issue. Because they can’t get laws passed, the radical left is like a baby having a tantrum and wants to change over 200 years of history and make it potentially ridiculously easy to pass laws. I have seen current poll maps and it is possible for the Republicans to sweep into complete power in November but by the tiniest margin. That would possibly mean that a single vote margin in both houses could enact what you might call the radical right laws. There would be nothing that the Democrats could do to stop any legislation whatsoever if the left (they are all radical, minus Manchin) got their filibuster rule changed.  That is where the current filibuster comes into play as any new law would require several Democrats to agree with the majority Republicans and vice versa.  Do you want the potential for your radical right to have free rein as the radical left wants by killing the filibuster or is the radical left just as (if not more) dangerous? Let’s see if we have a history in this area? Oh yeah, the Democrats changed the rules in the Senate to allow federal judges to not have to overcome the filibuster. Obama was not getting his federal judge nominations passed and being angry, they changed the rules instead of nominating more moderate justices. They were warned that it would come back to bite them. They didn’t care and chose the nuclear option to change the rules. Oops! Any guess how Trump got all of his Supreme Court nominees passed against strong Democrat opposition? The Democrats got rid of the filibuster for federal judges after another tantrum   So when you are so worried about the radical right, are you equally concerned in what the radical left is always doing by changing rules and history which were put into place just for situations like we are in? So while Manchin gets it, what about his other 50 colleagues (49 + Harris)?  What concerns you more, Abbott and Paxton or the Democrats who want to make it to where if the Republicans do take over, they can go wild… at least in your mind? 
    • MODS please remove that ISD twitter link! I had no idea it would copy the whole posting. I only highlighted the portion about the venue change. Sorry about that!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...