Jump to content

Vidor 27 Baytown Lee 14/Final


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

I have just one question. How do you throw a flag, wave it off, consult with the opposing coach, then mark off for the flag? Never seen anything like that before.

The fumble in the end zone covered by Lee for a touchback on a QB dive, is another head scratcher.

Please explain further Im a little curious about what happened on the fumble into the endzone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please explain further Im a little curious about what happened on the fumble into the endzone.


First of all we scored the play before. The RB was called down at the 1/2 yard line. I have the picture that shows the ball three yards in the end zone bfforf his knees are down. I just don't know how to get it on here. Next play we run the QB sneak. Ball was not fumbled on the snap or anything. QB goes into the pilesnd is laying across the goal line. Refs come together and claim the ball was fumbled in the end zone, recovered by Lee for a touchback. That was the start of the questionable calls.

The craziest was the false start on 4th and 1. Vidor has the ball around there own 45. They decide to go for it. They break the huddle and line
up. They don't set, the QB pulls out from Center, the back ref plows is whistle to start the clock, which should have been done when the ball was set. The left guard stands up as a reaction to the whistle while the QB is not under center. Side ref throws a flag. All the refs come together, then announce to the crowd, no foul due to the inadvertent whistle. Lee coach goes wild and starts ranting. Refs come together again. Break up and talk to Lee coach again. Then the ref and side judge who threw the flag talk for about 3 minutes. The ref then signals false start and backs Vidor up 5 yards. Never seen anything like that before.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congrats on the win. But it did someone concerned me that you struggled against the weakest team in the district.


Not an excuse. Refs took 2 touchdowns off the board on bogus calls. A fumble in the end zone after the ball crosses the goal line on a QB sneak. And a holding call, flag was thrown at the line when the ball carrier was 30 yards down field.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
    • Classic Bridge City.  Always someone else's fault, refs/umpires cheated, AD with an agenda, yada, yada, yada.  As far as I can tell it's damn near impossible to get fired at these schools so when someone does get fired, it's usually something.  Drama at Bridge City is a constant.  The guy did a good job coaching basketball and I'm sure he'll continue that somewhere else.  Time to move on.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...