franksnbeans

[quote name="westend1" post="723575" timestamp="1259944990"] 4 teams rushed for over 200, so it can be done.  Go get 'em Newton! [/quote] One was Gilmer, One was Celina, and the other 2 (Pewitt and New Diana) were in blowouts... 46-0 and 64-14.  

A question came up yesterday about Daingerfield's defensive stats. There is not one media source that has complete stats for the Tiger defense. But, after some research and digging I came up with what I believe are fairly accurate stats from pretty reliable sources. Of course, there will always be slight discrepancies in how stats are reported. Here is what I came up with for the yards allowed by the Tiger defense this year in each game, total for the year, and per game: Altlanta: 58 Rushing; 111 Passing; 169 Total Pewitt: 211 Rushing; 35 Passing; 246 Total Celina: 201 Rushing; 68 Passing; 269 Total Commerce: 68 Rushing; 75 Passing; 143 Total Gilmer: 215 Rushing; 216 Passing; 431 Total H.S. 196 Rushing; 60 Passing; 256 Total Linden: 51 Rushing; 11 Passing; 62 Total Jefferson: 143 Rushing; 14 Passing; 157 Total Ore City: 91 Rushing; 23 Passing; 114 Total Queen City: 15 Rushing; -4 Passing; 9 Total New Diana: 221 Rushing; -6 Passing; 215 Total Garrison: 108 Rushing; 10 Passing; 118 Total E. Chambers: 133 Rushing; 130 Passing; 263 Total Total: 1711 Rushing ;743 Passing; 2454 Total Per Game: 131.61 Rush; 57.15 Pass; 188.77 Total All this against what Massey says is the toughest schedule of any 2A team this year.

[quote name="cgenec79" post="723226" timestamp="1259888604"] [quote author=Treetopjump link=topic=63054.msg722972#msg722972 date=1259867211] If D-field kept their starters in the whole game like you guys have done the whole year the stats would blow your mind.......Thats why I said stats don't matter....thank you again coming from 17-2a!!!!!!!! [/quote]THis is going to be a great game.  BETWEEN KIDS!!!!!  Wife and I are Newton Faithful and just like most of the other Newton Fans we understand that these are kids playing a game for no other reason than the love of the game and cheer from the crowd.  Stats show me one thing - Dfield is a talented football team just as Newton is.  All of this, "who has better stats mumbo jumbo,"  is pointless.  We know Dfield pulls starters when then are wining and Newton Faithful know that Barbay (Greatest Coach Ever) punts and kicks fieldgoals on 1st down when they are winning.  All I care is about is that the kids have fun and stay healthy.  Of course we want Newton to win but I also want them to be proud of the game they played.  FYI- Newton Faithful need to talk Coach Barbay into running up score and padding stats next year so some fans of other teams will have more to talk about before the weeks matchup. ;) [/quote] Great post.  I agree... it's a game played by "young men" and I appreciate the effort put out by both teams.  I pay 7 or 8 dollars for my ticket to be entertained.  These [s]kids[/s] young men pour their heart and soul out for their teammates, their parents and the fans.  Trust me... it means way more to the players than it does to anyone else (fans, parents, coaches) anybody....  Looking forward to it.  I am glad we are playing a storied program like Newton.  I wouldn't want it any other way. 

I believe Daingerfield's correct offensive stats are these: Rushing:  2959 yards;  228 yards/game Passing:  1696 yards;  130 yards/game Total:  4655; 358 yards/game Those are the stats through all 13 games. 

[quote name="Hotrodg" post="723103" timestamp="1259874957"] Usually (but not always) when negative passing yards are reported it is net passing yards.  That is yards passing minus yards lost attempting to pass. An example: Opponent has 309 yards passing and was sacked 2 times for a total of 10 yards in losses.  Net passing yards for the team would be 299, though the QB would still be listed as having 309.  (These are the actually the totals for the Cowboys on Thanksgiving) This is actually the "correct" way to report total passing yards for the team.  For this reason it is common for the QB to have more passing yards than the team does (if they get sacked just once this happens). It gets confusing for high school because most of the "stat guys" are fans with a pad and pen that just do their best to replicate box scores they see in the paper without bothering to learn the "proper" methods.  (For the record I am not disparaging them, simply making a truthful statement.  They are willing to do the stats where most are not..you take the good with the bad.) It is not uncommon for there to be variation as reported by newspapers either.  For example the Beaumont Enterprise is not accurate for Newton as it has no stats for the CC game in week 0. [/quote] Great post.  But I would just add one thing.  In high school football, sacks go against rushing stats.  It is not the same as in the pros where sacks go against passing stats.  In this case, New Diana actually completed a pass and the receiver was stopped 6 yards behind the line of scrimmage, thus the negative yardage counts against the team (and individual's) passing stats.   ;)

[quote name="Jcmeek83" post="723082" timestamp="1259873494"] [quote author=westend1 link=topic=63054.msg723081#msg723081 date=1259873307] [quote author=Treetopjump link=topic=63054.msg723072#msg723072 date=1259873041] [quote author=Jcmeek83 link=topic=63054.msg723043#msg723043 date=1259872084] [quote author=Treetopjump link=topic=63054.msg723039#msg723039 date=1259871902] I really think you guys are just trying to make ya'll feels good with these stats from who knows where...........Bottom line, at 2pm at SFA  TIGERS vs EAGLES ..........YA"LL BETTER BRING YOUR GAME!!!!!!!!!!!!! Love it!!!!!17-2a   [/quote] OK please stop talking about the stats if you do not like them don't read them. Im pretty sure Newton will bring there Game I just hope your players are no as arrogant as you Daingerfield fans are. [/quote]Sorry for being so arrogant............Can't help that D-field is so up front..........That just BIG BLUE FOOTBALL!!!!!!!! You gotta love 17-2a [/quote] Who all is still in from 17-2A? [/quote] None from 17-2A, 2 from 22-2a [/quote] None from 17-2A?   The defending state champs are from 17-2A.. uh..humm.. we're still here.  And we're the one's that are arrogant?

[quote name="Jcmeek83" post="723058" timestamp="1259872727"] [quote author=franksnbeans link=topic=63054.msg723049#msg723049 date=1259872372] [quote author=Jcmeek83 link=topic=63054.msg723021#msg723021 date=1259870808] [quote author=JAKEBRAKE link=topic=63054.msg723012#msg723012 date=1259870392] [quote author=Jcmeek83 link=topic=63054.msg722999#msg722999 date=1259869627] [quote author=JAKEBRAKE link=topic=63054.msg722994#msg722994 date=1259869416] [quote author=Jcmeek83 link=topic=63054.msg722918#msg722918 date=1259861807] [center]Newton Avg. Points Scored/Game: 43.85 Avg. Points Allowed/Game: 17.31[/center] [center]Daingerfield Avg. Points Scored/Game: 43.61 Avg. Points Allowed/Game: 9.61[/center] Team Off        Rush/Game      Pass/Game     Total/Game Newton            299                62                361 Daingerfield       211               127               338 Team  Def       Rush/Game      Pass/Game     Total/Game Newton             160                 71               231 Daingerfield        95                 116               212 [/quote] You can take about 70 yards off those passing yards allowed by daingerfield, it's about 58 yards per game, and the bulk of that coming against Gilmer.  That would make our defense giving up about 153 total yds per game.  Your padding the stats to give yourself hope, that's commendable. [/quote] I don't pad stats man, I take real stats with realible sources. I tell it how it is I do not show favortism. [/quote] I bet if we wanted to look hard enough, the stats you put out there for Newton are incorrect.  All that matters is that come Saturday at 2:00 the score is 0-0 and the loser goes home, throw the stats out the window, or not, makes no nevermind to us or our boys. [/quote] There are several places to get the Newton Stats and the Dangerfield stats if u would like to see where they are posted please send me a personal msg. as for me I get the stats from the Newton stat Tech and they are confirmed by the Beamont Enterprise. Dangerfield stats came from your local Newspaper and were confired by Texarkana Press also WOS GRAD helped confirm them. Anyways the stats don't matter they are just fun to look at the game is not won on paper it is won on the field. [/quote] The Daingerfield stats are not right.  I don't know what to tell you other than that.  Go look for yourself.  I gave you the passing stats by the teams that faced Daingerfield in each game.  Like I said, I am not trying to start anything.. I didn't bring up the stats. A Newton fan posted them.  I am just trying to tell you that they are not right.  So... take that for what it is worth.   [/quote] Well Saturday those are the stats we are going to broadcast over the air so I would say Im taking it for nothing just another Dfield fan mouthing off. and where did you get the game by game passing stats two of those teams had negative passing total's that seems a little odd, Not to often in a season you shut two teams down to negative passing yards. but whatever [/quote] You can broadcast them and they would be wrong.  How is it I am being mouthy?  I'm trying to help you out man.  The stats are wrong.  Yes, Queen City had negative passing yards.  A pass caught behind the line of scrimmage that goes for negative yards, results in a negative play.  New Diana had negative yards.  They completed one pass to their own team... it went for negative yards.  Where did you get your stats for each game?  Go to maxpreps.  Several of the game stats are there, but not all.  You can go to Longview News Journal for some box scores, but not all.  You can get some from Dallas Morning News.  You can get some from the Marshall paper.  The point is... I looked them up... all of them... The stats on here are not right... not sure how that is mouthing off.  

[quote name="Jcmeek83" post="723043" timestamp="1259872084"] [quote author=Treetopjump link=topic=63054.msg723039#msg723039 date=1259871902] I really think you guys are just trying to make ya'll feels good with these stats from who knows where...........Bottom line, at 2pm at SFA  TIGERS vs EAGLES ..........YA"LL BETTER BRING YOUR GAME!!!!!!!!!!!!! Love it!!!!!17-2a   [/quote] OK please stop talking about the stats if you do not like them don't read them. Im pretty sure Newton will bring there Game I just hope your players are no as arrogant as you Daingerfield fans are. [/quote] What are you talking about?  Why are we always accused of arrogance?  I don't get that.  

[quote name="Jcmeek83" post="723021" timestamp="1259870808"] [quote author=JAKEBRAKE link=topic=63054.msg723012#msg723012 date=1259870392] [quote author=Jcmeek83 link=topic=63054.msg722999#msg722999 date=1259869627] [quote author=JAKEBRAKE link=topic=63054.msg722994#msg722994 date=1259869416] [quote author=Jcmeek83 link=topic=63054.msg722918#msg722918 date=1259861807] [center]Newton Avg. Points Scored/Game: 43.85 Avg. Points Allowed/Game: 17.31[/center] [center]Daingerfield Avg. Points Scored/Game: 43.61 Avg. Points Allowed/Game: 9.61[/center] Team Off        Rush/Game      Pass/Game     Total/Game Newton            299                62                361 Daingerfield       211               127               338 Team  Def       Rush/Game      Pass/Game     Total/Game Newton             160                 71               231 Daingerfield        95                 116               212 [/quote] You can take about 70 yards off those passing yards allowed by daingerfield, it's about 58 yards per game, and the bulk of that coming against Gilmer.  That would make our defense giving up about 153 total yds per game.  Your padding the stats to give yourself hope, that's commendable. [/quote] I don't pad stats man, I take real stats with realible sources. I tell it how it is I do not show favortism. [/quote] I bet if we wanted to look hard enough, the stats you put out there for Newton are incorrect.  All that matters is that come Saturday at 2:00 the score is 0-0 and the loser goes home, throw the stats out the window, or not, makes no nevermind to us or our boys. [/quote] There are several places to get the Newton Stats and the Dangerfield stats if u would like to see where they are posted please send me a personal msg. as for me I get the stats from the Newton stat Tech and they are confirmed by the Beamont Enterprise. Dangerfield stats came from your local Newspaper and were confired by Texarkana Press also WOS GRAD helped confirm them. Anyways the stats don't matter they are just fun to look at the game is not won on paper it is won on the field. [/quote] The Daingerfield stats are not right.  I don't know what to tell you other than that.  Go look for yourself.  I gave you the passing stats by the teams that faced Daingerfield in each game.  Like I said, I am not trying to start anything.. I didn't bring up the stats. A Newton fan posted them.  I am just trying to tell you that they are not right.  So... take that for what it is worth.  

[quote name="Jcmeek83" post="722986" timestamp="1259868784"] [quote author=Treetopjump link=topic=63054.msg722972#msg722972 date=1259867211] If D-field kept their starters in the whole game like you guys have done the whole year the stats would blow your mind.......Thats why I said stats don't matter....thank you again coming from 17-2a!!!!!!!! [/quote] We do pull starters out  midway through the 3rd qrt in a blowout, The stats show th truth. Passing                        Name                             Com   Att   Yds   TD   Int [color=purple]Newton- Halston Flanigan                  31    69    814    7     8 [/color] [color=blue]Dain.-    Tyler Boyd                            73   134   1273   19    2 [/color] Rushing               Name             Rushes   Yds   Yd/Att  TD [color=purple]Newton-Kelvin Bennett       170     1650   9.71    21 Newton-Jeremy Jackson      130     1267   9.75    15   Newton- LaRay Alfred          33      348    10.55    3 [/color] [color=blue] Dain.-Koko Smith               151     1088    7.21    17 Dain.-Tyler Smith              128      685     5.35     7 [/color] Receiving               Name               Rec.   Yds.    Yd/Rec  TD [color=purple]Newton-Desmond Beatty     12     336       28.0     5 Newton-Tim Simmons           7      214      30.6     1  [/color] [color=blue]Dain.-Chris Jones               22      430      19.6     5 Dain.-Keyarris Garrett         15      229      15.3     6 [/color]   Jackson has 19 less carries and more yards it has nothing to do with keeping in starters the whole game, and bennett has only played in one playoff game due to a injury in week 10. I really wish Laray could come back for this one but I know if he does he will not be 100%. he has been out since week 4. are passing game is a concern but Halston has look really good the last couple of week, He is throwing the ball better now then he has all season he getting that touch back he had last year. [/quote] Actually KoKo has 1214 yards rushing and 22 touchdowns.  Tyler Boyd has 789 yards rushing and 10 touchdowns. Boyd has 1696 yards passing; 25 touchdowns passing; 2 ints.

[quote name="Jcmeek83" post="722996" timestamp="1259869514"] [quote author=franksnbeans link=topic=63054.msg722993#msg722993 date=1259869379] [quote author=~old_wildcat~ link=topic=63054.msg722954#msg722954 date=1259865321] [quote author=Jcmeek83 link=topic=63054.msg722918#msg722918 date=1259861807] [center]Newton Avg. Points Scored/Game: 43.85 Avg. Points Allowed/Game: 17.31[/center] [center]Daingerfield Avg. Points Scored/Game: 43.61 Avg. Points Allowed/Game: 9.61[/center] Team Off        Rush/Game      Pass/Game     Total/Game Newton            299                62                361 Daingerfield       211               127               338 Team  Def       Rush/Game      Pass/Game     Total/Game Newton             160                 71               231 Daingerfield        95                 116               212 [/quote] UH OH..!!!   Not as much difference as you thought huh daingerfield.... If Newton plays the way the stats show & daingerfield plays the same way..If I was daingerfield I wouldn't invite Uncle Fred to the game to watch them win.... ;D ;D [/quote] Those stats are not even close to right for Daingerfield.  Someone needs to do some more research.  Daingerfield does not give up that many passing yards per game.   [/quote] Those are the real stats look them up yourself if you don't Belevie me, Gilmer hit ya up for some passing yards that was one of the games [/quote] Those are not the real stats.  I did look them up.   Atlanta had 122 yards passing against Daingerfield. Pewitt: 35 Celina: 68 Commerce: 75 Gilmer: 216 H.S.: 60 LK.: 11 Jeff: 14 O.C.: 23 Q.C.: negative 4 N.D.: negative 6 Garrison: 10 E.C.: 130 Those are the real stats.  Go look them up.  Not sure where setx got the average, and I'm not trying to start anything.  I'm just trying to inform.  

[quote name="Hotrodg" post="722981" timestamp="1259868356"] [quote author=franksnbeans link=topic=63054.msg722862#msg722862 date=1259855584] I don't know about the players, but it certainly seems some of the fans think Newton is outgunned in this contest.  I will tell you that as a Daingerfield fan this game makes me a little nervous.  I believe Daingerfield is the better team, but as someone else said, the best team does not always win.  Newton is a very good team and very well coached.  They have all the incentive in the world to be "up" for this game, because Daingerfield knocked them out of the playoffs last year.  I would be interested in getting someone's honest opinion about how Newton matches up with Daingerfield.  Daingerfield is big and fast and loaded at the skilled positions.  Daingerfield's defense is as strong or stronger than it was last year.  They create turnovers (10 takeaways in 3 playoff games) and score off those turnovers (6 defensive touchdowns in 3 playoff games).  I believe Newton will be able to run the ball some and maybe hit a big pass or two off of the play action.  Daingerfield blitzes a lot, and sometimes they can get caught in an all out blitz, like the 75 yard toucdown pass EC scored on.  Noone was home in the middle of the field and it was just pitch and catch.  But, they also create a lot of negative plays (tackles for losses, sacks, turnovers).  Sort of a high risk, high reward defense.  Anyone with thoughts on how Newton will match up? [/quote] You have it pretty much right.  Daingerfield has two edges that makes them the better team in my mind.  One is relatively minor, one is potentially huge.  The first edge is size.  This is not a big of a deal as Newton historically is a bit on the small size as compared to the other teams at the same level particularly on the line.  This is minor though as they also tend to be quicker and use that as an advantage which tends to even out.  Those smaller linemen can generally move well and you see lots of pulling blocks, traps, defensive stunts, etc. Now the other is consistency on defense.  Newton has a new DC this year and the D has not consistently performed at the level Newton is accustomed to, that may or may not be the DC.  At times the defense has looked very good and at times very sloppy.  If the sloppy version shows up this week it will be a long day.  The good news for Eagle fans is the D has tended to play to the competition.  All said this is likely the key to the outcome of the game. In terms of the matchup:  Newton will be successful in the ground game.  Barring fumbled snaps or the like this is an area where Newton excels on sheer execution.  They'll also likely have a few big play action passes for long gains.  The passing game is not as dangerous as what DF saw in this game last year.  The same quality is not there at the WR position. As for fans that think Newton is outgunned...  Yep many of us happen to be well educated on football and have watched our Eagles through enough deep playoff runs to be able to look at things with an honest, critical eye.  We've watched Newton beat teams that were better than them.  We've watched teams we were better than send us home too.  We understand that is championship level football.  Being good is not enough.  I also thought DF was the better team last year.  But anyone with even a small amount football knowledge and looks at that game objectively (I think based on your posts you fall in this group) knows that the margin could have EASILY been 14 points different in either direction.  I think this year's matchup is similar.  DF comes in as the favorite but the outcome is far from a foregone conclusion.  I think DF has played at this level long enough not to make the mistake of taking any team in the quarterfinals for granted and especially not one like Newton.  My pick is DF but it will once again be a ballgame. [/quote] Great Post... I appeciate your thoughts.  I can't disagree with anything you wrote.  

[quote name="~old_wildcat~" post="722954" timestamp="1259865321"] [quote author=Jcmeek83 link=topic=63054.msg722918#msg722918 date=1259861807] [center]Newton Avg. Points Scored/Game: 43.85 Avg. Points Allowed/Game: 17.31[/center] [center]Daingerfield Avg. Points Scored/Game: 43.61 Avg. Points Allowed/Game: 9.61[/center] Team Off        Rush/Game      Pass/Game     Total/Game Newton            299                62                361 Daingerfield       211               127               338 Team  Def       Rush/Game      Pass/Game     Total/Game Newton             160                 71               231 Daingerfield        95                 116               212 [/quote] UH OH..!!!   Not as much difference as you thought huh daingerfield.... If Newton plays the way the stats show & daingerfield plays the same way..If I was daingerfield I wouldn't invite Uncle Fred to the game to watch them win.... ;D ;D [/quote] Those stats are not even close to right for Daingerfield.  Someone needs to do some more research.  Daingerfield does not give up that many passing yards per game.  

I don't know about the players, but it certainly seems some of the fans think Newton is outgunned in this contest.  I will tell you that as a Daingerfield fan this game makes me a little nervous.  I believe Daingerfield is the better team, but as someone else said, the best team does not always win.  Newton is a very good team and very well coached.  They have all the incentive in the world to be "up" for this game, because Daingerfield knocked them out of the playoffs last year.  I would be interested in getting someone's honest opinion about how Newton matches up with Daingerfield.  Daingerfield is big and fast and loaded at the skilled positions.  Daingerfield's defense is as strong or stronger than it was last year.  They create turnovers (10 takeaways in 3 playoff games) and score off those turnovers (6 defensive touchdowns in 3 playoff games).  I believe Newton will be able to run the ball some and maybe hit a big pass or two off of the play action.  Daingerfield blitzes a lot, and sometimes they can get caught in an all out blitz, like the 75 yard toucdown pass EC scored on.  Noone was home in the middle of the field and it was just pitch and catch.  But, they also create a lot of negative plays (tackles for losses, sacks, turnovers).  Sort of a high risk, high reward defense.  Anyone with thoughts on how Newton will match up?

[quote name="Jcmeek83" post="722273" timestamp="1259767658"] Some of the Newton players I talked to yesterday acted a little worried about Dfield, acting like they were not sure if they would win or not. That really worries me because Newton teams in the past allways played with alot of confidence. My msg to the players is not to worry about saturday, play Newton football and have fun.      P.S. Play every game like its the last football game u will ever play, Leave it all on the field. I never live in regret. [/quote] Sounds like they have been watching film on the Tigers.  LOL!  Well, if Newton plays the way they did in the second half against LK it will be a good game.  Barbay will have the Eagles ready to play I am sure.  They have the revenge factor.  I honestly don't believe the Eagles match up talent for talent with the Tigers, but the most talented team doesn't always win.  Daingerfield better come ready to play or Newton will make them pay.  Good luck to both teams.  This is what high school football is all about.. two great teams... 7 state titles between them... playing for a chance to represent Region III in the Semis. 

Tigers advance as Eagles are burnt by a steaming cup of KoKo.  ;D

He's got my vote. 

[quote name="Jcmeek83" post="721412" timestamp="1259677809"] [quote author=ChampionEagles link=topic=63054.msg721375#msg721375 date=1259670419] The game has been set for Homer Bryce Stadium in Nacogdoches on Saturday at 2:00pm. This is the same stadium Newton beat Daingerfield in for the state title in '98. Maybe a repeat. Go Eagles! [/quote]Lets hope of a repeat of those results, I really hope we get alot of fan support from the SETX coverage area. Come on out and support u local area teams. [/quote] I went to the Newton-LK game.  Newton had a pretty good crowd.  Not near as big as last year's Daingerfield-Newton game, but that is to be expected.  I also noticed quite a few Newton fans at the Daingerfield-EC game.  It should be a big crowd Saturday in Nacogdoches.  I expect Daingerfield to bring a big crowd as usual and being closer than Carthage for Newton fans, I would expect even more folks in purple this year.  Not to mention all the other East Texans who are just interested in the game.  I can't wait. 

[quote name="OverandOver" post="720921" timestamp="1259608554"] Is the Chris Jones (#3 UT boy) for D field playing? [/quote] Not sure if Jones will go this week or not.  I would guess he will try to give it a go.  But, that is just speculation.  He was not in uniform Friday night. We will have to wait and see.

[quote name="EagleFan01" post="720593" timestamp="1259549195"] Guys don't worry about these sour EC fans there just mad because they can never beat Newton and never will.... As far a Yall JV beating ours yeah you did but all Newtons playmaker sophmores are on varsity so don't get to excited about that...... As for the game saturday Newton wins Newton-26 DF-22 [/quote] I don't think Newton will hold Daingerfield to fewer points than LK scored.  Newton will have to score more than 26 to win the game in my opinion.  Newton's offense is capable of scoring, so Daingerfield's defense will have to play well.  Gonna be fun to watch.  Region III is loaded as usual. 

[quote name="JustAPlayersMom" post="720554" timestamp="1259546360"] #10 Krishon Seastrunk #5 Desmond Beatty #62 Dalton Simmons #4 Bryan Foster #21 Deion Sharp [/quote] Thanks for the help.  ;D

[quote name="~old_wildcat~" post="720477" timestamp="1259536583"] [quote author=franksnbeans link=topic=63054.msg720461#msg720461 date=1259535442] [quote author=~old_wildcat~ link=topic=63054.msg720327#msg720327 date=1259521556] [quote author=franksnbeans link=topic=63054.msg720301#msg720301 date=1259518704] [quote author=NOTWENS link=topic=63054.msg720182#msg720182 date=1259505587] [quote author=Bobby Light link=topic=63054.msg720129#msg720129 date=1259474177] I agree with u there, those two quick turnovers killed us, it changed the momentum of the game. Now I'm not saying we would have won, but maybe the score wouldn't have been so bad. [/quote]u   r  exactly right   yall had it going the right way,   but those quick turn overs  changed the game all together.  EC gave somebody  the blue print  of how to score on dangerfield. [/quote] [b]EC got beat by 50.  They gave somebody a blue print?  LOL!  Now that's funny. [/b]   [/quote]  Get bored on Smoaky Bean Man.. ;D [/quote] No, not bored.  Just trying to get some info. on Newton's starters.  I was going to post some of the pictures I took of Newton, but I wanted to get all their names first.  Found of few more already (Simmons, Seastrunk), but still need a few more.  Anybody got their names?  #10, #5, #62, #4, #21? [/quote]  [b]jcmeek83 [/b]  , frank would know..He's been in Newton a long time..and knows everyone there..check him out.. [/quote] Thanks, I got it though.  Looking forward to a great game. 

[quote name="~old_wildcat~" post="720327" timestamp="1259521556"] [quote author=franksnbeans link=topic=63054.msg720301#msg720301 date=1259518704] [quote author=NOTWENS link=topic=63054.msg720182#msg720182 date=1259505587] [quote author=Bobby Light link=topic=63054.msg720129#msg720129 date=1259474177] I agree with u there, those two quick turnovers killed us, it changed the momentum of the game. Now I'm not saying we would have won, but maybe the score wouldn't have been so bad. [/quote]u   r  exactly right   yall had it going the right way,   but those quick turn overs  changed the game all together.  EC gave somebody  the blue print  of how to score on dangerfield. [/quote] [b]EC got beat by 50.  They gave somebody a blue print?  LOL!  Now that's funny. [/b]  [/quote]   Get bored on Smoaky Bean Man.. ;D [/quote] No, not bored.  Just trying to get some info. on Newton's starters.  I was going to post some of the pictures I took of Newton, but I wanted to get all their names first.  Found of few more already (Simmons, Seastrunk), but still need a few more.  Anybody got their names?  #10, #5, #62, #4, #21?

I need some help with Newton's starters.  Here is what I have so far.  Can someone fill in the blanks for me? Offense LT - #60 Taylor Duett LG - #62 ? C - #61 Dylan Singh RG - #51 Tevin Adams RT - #70 Tanner Powell TE - #22 ? WR - #5 ? QB - #3 Halston Flanigan RB - #25 Jeremy Jackson RB - #11 Kelvin Bennett Defense DE - #55 William McBride DT - #99 ? DT - #10 ? DE - #8 Malcolm Mattox LB - #7 Kendrae Arnold LB - #4 ? SS - #1 ? SS - #3 Halston Flanigan FS - #12 Desmond Beatty CB - #21 ? CB - #5 ?

[quote name="NOTWENS" post="720182" timestamp="1259505587"] [quote author=Bobby Light link=topic=63054.msg720129#msg720129 date=1259474177] I agree with u there, those two quick turnovers killed us, it changed the momentum of the game. Now I'm not saying we would have won, but maybe the score wouldn't have been so bad. [/quote]u   r  exactly right   yall had it going the right way,   but those quick turn overs  changed the game all together.  EC gave somebody  the blue print  of how to score on dangerfield. [/quote] EC got beat by 50.  They gave somebody a blue print?  LOL!  Now that's funny.