Jump to content

dogbite

Members
  • Posts

    295
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by dogbite

  1. 9 hours ago, Brubaker said:

    Make that QB change and you’ll get a lot worse in the secondary, so there’s that as well.  Only so many players to go around and they’re trying to figure It out

    But losing help in the secondary and getting better at QB is well worth it.  Even if we goto a run first offense … with an athletic qb we could run an effective bootleg and play action along with the QB leaving the pocket when needed.  Secondary will be ok just be next man up. 

  2. 7 minutes ago, tvc184 said:

    The first qb, tall (sophomore?) had a huge arm and could sling it. His passes at times were way off mark but it might have been the wrong pattern and/or timing. A receiver  breaks left and he throws right. I thought the line looked okay but they seriously looked like they needed someone to want to carry the ball.

    In though the second qb that came in (I think) with the first team during game like conditions, did a better job of moving the team. Was it better qb play or was the team coming together better nest the end? I might have been to shell shocked to notice and I am being serious. I think when noticing such glaring mistakes (which were plenty)  it is easy to overlook the good parts.

    HF seemed very inspired and were getting after it.

    I know it is a scrimmage but next week might get ugly if some serious improvement isn’t made. Maybe last night was like throwing a cold bucket of water on someone, shockingly waking them up. 

    Agree with most of your assessment,  there were lots of players in/out in the skilled positions, OLine and defense.  You can tell they are searching for the right grouping, but they better spend all week in a catching and tackling clinic.

  3. 11 hours ago, tvc184 said:

    A scrimmage is a glorified practice. It is supposed to allow the coach to try doing things, look at players and especially look for bright spots.

     These were the bright spots for Nederland: 

    1.

     These are the issues I noticed:

    1. Tackling

    2. Catching the ball. 

    3. Passing 

    4. Rushing

    5. Blocking

     

    Amazes me that catching was #2 on your list.  I was baffled at the amount of drops, although tackling was weak too.  Not sure how you fix not being able to catch???  Tackling, probably some changes in personnel needed but tackling can be coached up with proper coaching and enough time put in.

  4. On 1/8/2022 at 4:01 PM, NHSBulldogFan said:

    Both QBs will do fine from what I've seen. OL is the biggest question mark. The reason I say WR is a question mark is can our returners match the production that Fuselier brought that remains to be seen.

    Are there any returning OL?  

  5. 7 hours ago, spidersal said:

    PNGFaithful

    I watched 10 Bulldog games and I saw a text n of arm tackling and poor fundamental tackling skills. In other words, a very weak defense

    Faircloth takes the top athletes and puts them on offense and then the defense takes shape. He gets ridiculed, but seems to make the playoffs. 

    I don’t know if Barrow and staff have been to the playoffs more than 1 time since he has become head coach. 

    PNG and Nederland have just about equal talent, however it seems as if PNG gets more production from their players than Nederland does in my opinion 

    So Spidersal with your keen insight into football, especially Bulldog football, does Nederland have anything coming back next year? Or what about coming up? 

×
×
  • Create New...