UT alum

Don’t want to offend any sensitivities. I’ve been cautioned about language before.

8

Yeah, I know. If the President can grab ‘em by the p***y, this guy’s a rookie.

Chuck Grassley? Ok. Biden’s justice Dept. was looking for election liars and cheats. Trump goes after people he doesn’t like,ala Nixon.

When did you go to school? I went ‘60 - ‘72. 60-70 was a D in Silsbee. Also, Trump got 62% of the vote in the three county area in ‘24. Add up A, B, and C votes from KFDM you get 52%. 15% drop in deep red Texas. That holds, House and Senate will flip. Come November, urban and suburban vote will spank his party with its pants down. I 35 corridor going purple, Trump may succeed in turning it blue.

Then why you talking about Trump if your post was Cornyn/paxton?

Kelley was NO BILLED. Trying to prosecute Powell to get him out of their hair defines weaponizing the criminal justice system to get rid of enemies. [Hidden Content]

If politicians lie as often as most everyone says they do (all parties) why look for what they say online? I’d rather read reporting on what they actually do.

Biden Justice department prosecuted criminals. What do you call attempts to indict Mark Kelley other than an attempt to prosecute an enemy? Chasing after Powell to try and catch him, among others on Trumped up loan lying charges? Don’t talk to me about hypocrisy.

Wouldn’t it be a wonderful world if there was no need to mention race.

Interesting that D wasn’t a choice.

KFDM showed out of 22,000+ votes, 33%gave him an A. 47% gave him an F. Since Sinclair owns KFDM, I don’t think the numbers are rigged.

You play a mean game of whatabout.

I give him a D. Dishonest, Disloyal, Divisive, Derogatory, Distrustful, Disgraceful, Disingenuous.

I don’t care to know how it works. Can’t be any harder to figure out than Facebook (don’t do it either), and they have 3.5 billion users last I read. Complicated, it can’t be.

You ignore the point. Uncertainty caused a drop. If things stay uncertain the drop will continue. November looms ever larger.

Steady as she goes, of course. I was just seconding your statement that business doesn’t like uncertainty.

DOW down 660 on uncertainty created by the Chaos-in-Chief.

I don’t play on X. Besides, it is not a legitimate source of facts.

Tomato, tomato. Difference is, his tariff actions will have to be either temporary or approved through appropriate channels. As I’ve said, Trump doesn’t play well with others. If he wants it, it is deemed appropriate. This won’t end well

Read his words on Truth Social posted be Reagan above. “Any country that wants to”play games” with the ridiculous Supreme Court decision” basically better watch out. Sound like he’s going to ignore it, or replace it with other illegal means.

Not according to what he said in Reagan’s post just above.

Any tariff levied under IEEPA authority is illegal. If importers refuse to collect, what could Trump legally do?

Question for you regarding Trump’s bellowing about other countries better pay up regardless of the court ruling. Other countries don’t pay tariffs. United States importers pay the cost of tariffs. If they are deemed illegal by the highest court in the land, how does the Orangutan in chief force any importer to pay? It would be against the law if they did.

If the court makes a ruling you don’t like, give it the one finger salute and do what you want to anyway. A fine example of citizenship from the country’s leader.