-
Posts
1,551 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by The Icon
-
-
LP 14 - CV 7
Half
LP 34 - CV 21
Final -
Good game Dogs!
Bring Ned it's first 'outright' DC since awhile -
Don't believe that it will be that much of a scoring affair. I see LP's D coming up with some with key stops on Homecoming Night!
LP 24 - CV 17 -
PS - Just say No to cow tipping
Satisfactory? lol -
I remember a similar instance happened in Ned a few years back. Not sure if that incident received this much pub. Look, kids make mistakes and are then subjugated to the required punishment.
If they are granted the appeal by going through the proper channels, then more power to them. And if you're a tax paying citizen of Nederland upset by the decision, then attend The school board meeting and have your voice heard.
Hopefully, these student-athletes have learned a valuable lesson and never put themselves or another in a similar situation again. -
LP 47 - Lee 17
Final
Keith Whitely - 100+ yards rushing
Johnathon Lewis - 100+ yards rushing
Aaron Garrett - roughly 100 receiving/1 interception
Josh Vidales - roughly 150 passing and 80 rushing
Defense played great, lots of cramping -
31 - 0, LP. 5 minutes to play
Defense has played well, 2s are in -
24 - 0, LP
Key players are cramping up -
LP 21 - Clements 0
Half
LP offense is relying on big plays, defense is looking tired. -
I know someone mentioned it in an earlier post, so I dont want to come off like I am taking the credit for this one.
But it sounds a lot like the offense from the late 90's (Ross LaBove/Joe Ramoin) up until the end of the Mosley Era (2004-06). -
I meant to ask are they running 2 back/2 TE sets and/or 2 back multiple Pro and I sets with 1 TE.
Does that make more sense? -
So.... Back to the topic at hand.... Nederland football
Are they working a lot of 2 TE and 2 back sets, or just the regular multiple Pro and I formations? -
Out of curiosity, not sarcasm, when was the last time Ned beat WOS?
The last I can recall was 2003 in WOS -
Some schools are having to trim down to one tournament in most sports
-
Blue, I'm sure everyone on this thread would love to keep all teachers. What Smitty and I were offering was a shave the budget.
I, personally, do not want to get rid of any teachers. However, we are currently presented with a budget predicament in most district around the state. And those same districts are offering 'Early Retirement Incentives' in order to get those teachers to move on. No one is making anyone do anything. In fact, most probationary teachers (ones with 1-3 yrs exp) are the ones being cut.
Now, instead of having a lower student to teacher ratio by getting more experienced teachers to move on, and hiring younger teacher w/ experience or training. You are now left with almost 2 teachers per grade per department. With class sizes of 30+ your child is getting no individual attention.
Pick your poison -
Rick Perry
I'm not sure who said it, but get him out. Whomever called me Tea Party couldn't be farther!
I'd love to keep those 30+ year people! Their the basis of our education system. They've been there, done that. I'm just showing you where you could cut cost!
I believe I told you I'm not the biggest fan of that!!! -
My statement was geared more toward 55+
Sorry, if I hurt your feeling. But if you want to cut cost, that's how you cut cost. Its a matter of numbers. I'm not saying its my favorite idea, but some people who been teaching for 30+ years don't let go of jobs. For a LONG time -
For starters, if you want to cut down on budget. You'll need to get the old out. People who've been teaching for 25/30+ years, sitting on those jobs that younger people with modern teaching methods could have. You'll be shaving from 10-20k per new teacher you hire, and retiree you let go (or volunteers to retire [given incentive]).
The districts are top heavy in admin positions. You have some positions in some bigger districts that are superfulous and uneccesary. You don't need a Math/Science/Soc Studies/ELA 'Coach' to work with teachers to work with kids. Have teachers meet a given number of development hours outside of school, rather than pay this 'coach' 60/70/80k dollars to work with the teachers. The Dept Heads of each core subject should be savvy enough to help their colleagues.
If we're going to be investing all this money in technology for our schools, teachers need to utilize it. $3000 projecters being used for Smart Boards/Mimios don't do anygood if the teacher/instructor doesn't know how or refuses to use it.
You have some districts where every admin has a DAMN iPhone, paid for by the district.
These might not answer all problems, but it is a start. -
Having been involved with organized football (Small Private HS all the way to College) my entire life, I can tell you a few things about running a successful program. Most coaches now a days are teachers. And admins aren't holding onto coaches who have low TAKS or PDAS (Appraisal) scores. I spoke with a very successful AD/HC in our area about 5 years ago, and he told me the era of the Coach who does PE only is over. If you want to coach, you better be able to teach something.
As long as you have coaches who can teach, effectively, then your staff can stay near to the size it has bee. Budget cuts are going to find staffs regardless. But if coaches are certified in a core subject, they'll be fine.
Smitty, you don't know the first thing about running a successful program. I would LOVE for you and one other person to control 80 hyped up 14 yr olds for an hour lol! Or organize and run a productive practice with 150 kids with 6 coaches! WON'T WORK!! -
Look, its a '6 in one hand, half a dozen in another" view. Both sides can argue their points of the importance of the number of coaches and their value in the classroom and on the field/court/course/track.
The point is, for football, you need at least 2 coaches for OL and DL, EACH! A backs coach, receivers/TE coach. Then DTs, DEs, LBs,and secondary. The OC can coach QBs, and the DC will typically coach ILBs or secondary. All depends on the systems being ran and the number of kids in the program. You can't just say 6 HS and 2 for frosh and JH/MS. 2 coaches can't control 60/70/80...etc kids. No way. You need a minimum of 3 for position purposes. 10-12 for a lot of schools have a crap ton of kids to work with.
Its an unfortunate situation that will get worst before it gets better. Our extracurricular activities (Athletics AND Fine Arts) will be taking a big hit. The kids will be the ones to suffer. Larger class sizes, higher student to teacher ratio, and less one on one time with the instructor.
No Child Left Behind... What a crock! Wish Rick Perry could sit in a classroom for a day -
Clear Eyes, Full Hearts, Can't Lose
-
That would put 5 high schools on the southside and only 3 on the northside.
Seems like the southside of Katy is developing rather quickly -
Tomball:
Memorial High School - set to open in 2011-12 school year; will be 3A (9th and 10th grades)
Katy:
2 new high schools set to open in the next few years. One in 2012-13 and another in 2013-14
Can anyone shed some light on these new schools?? Districts? Demographics? -
The 2004 group led by Dustin Hood was ranked
Not sure how high or for how long
Port Arthur Memorial vs. Channelview Game Thread/Memorial wins!
in SETXsports Archived Threads
Posted