Englebert

Yes yours was. You obviously won't answer the question (which was rhetorical anyway), but you have exposed (again) your inability to offer any insightful comments for this board. You can only pronounce judgmental proclamations from you self-proclaimed but imaginative pedestal. The entertainment value is priceless though. Carry on with your childish ways. See you on the next topic you bring into the gutter.

No, again you show your lack of analytical abilities. Everyone can easily see my post was a critique of your allegation...but in true oblivious fashion, you cannot muster a response so you resort to personal attacks in self defense. Do you not hear the laughter? Everyone else does. These are overly simplistic concepts that you cannot comprehend, so your fallback is unimaginative, boring, boiler plate Liberal attacks. Seriously, how are you not embarrassed? Let's see if you can muster a unique, thoughtful, or even sophomoric answer. I've asked this previously, so you've had time to ponder. But please, take all the time you need to offer an insightful response. Do you think you are intellectually capable of judging GOP voters? This should be good.

You insult "superiors", I call you out on it...and you come to the conclusion I am triggered. You are comical. Do you think your analytical skills are up to par with GOP voters? Really? Do you? Please, let the laughter continue.

It's hilarious that you've analyzed millions of GOP voters, and concluded that they are low IQ. This coming from someone who has displayed his inadequacies in simple analytical skills...but yet can somehow judge others. Will the entertainment value ever end? The laughter at such moronic/baseless/stereotyped conclusions is fodder for the sane. Please keep trying, so we can keep laughing.

Your analysis is worth...how much? Your attempts to stereotype are priceless, and clueless. Would you care to elaborate on your innermost thoughts of Southeast Texas? Do you want to reveal even more to the board of your true colors? Please continue with your condescension attempts. Never enough entertainment on this board.

Show me your skills. Oh wait, you have already...for free...and I still didn't get my money's worth.

After your continual immature and childish posts, do you actually think anyone would have the gall to fall for your "enlightened" analysis about any profession? You sound more and more like a politician...condescendingly tell the "little man" you are fighting for him while perched on your imaginative pedestal..while everyone can see your pants have fallen to your ankles. Do you hear the laughter?

How can someone that is so easily goaded into childish behavior, so easily manipulated into showing his insecurities in which he would readily and willingly display such on a public forum, be relied upon to make sound judgement decisions that involve billions of dollars. I believe you missed your calling. You should have been a career Liberal politician.

Your "everyone's ganging up on me" mentality. You might want to get that sixth grader to interpret the posts before you respond. Why do I need to put any money up? You are displaying your skillset right here...for free. Entertaining, and cheap.

Along with everything else, It's apparent you don't "get" sarcasm.

Ooh, now playing the victim. You make childish posts and receive pushback from multiple people, so now you think we are "colluding" against you? Only a Liberal victimhood mentality could fathom that rationale.

I'm curious if the reasoning for dropping the charges against Smollett are due to the upcoming presidential election. All of the Democrat presidential candidates would have to repeatedly answer the question of why they defended Smollett (if he was found guilty). Now, since the charges have been dropped, these candidates do not have to defend their own words/actions. Does this sound like collusion to influence the outcome of an election? Do we need to demand another special counsel to investigate?

Wow, this is comical. What does prior competitions have to do with the challenge that has been presented now? That's twice you've resorted to the "I'm not showing off my skills for free" ploy. Do you think anyone is buying that childish logic? Do you think anyone on here can't see through your obvious attempts to run from a simple little "workable" bet? Do you think anyone can't see that you are obviously scared? My only question is how in the world do you have no self-awareness of your immature behavior. It is entertaining for us though.

When the topic has ran it's course and the childish posts dominate, that's my cue to enter into the fray. Why do you think I'm on some many of your topics? Why are you running like a frightened schoolgirl from Nash's proposal? It's a very simple, logical, workable endeavor. But for some unknown reason (LOL), you choose to avoid the challenge by attaching unworkable "strings". Politicians use this tactic all the time. It's a childish way to avoid showing your true colors. So once again, if your scared, say your scared.

So you also chose to continue with the Middle School theme.

After being thoroughly humiliated on this topic, I'm surprised you have the gumption to bring it back to the forefront. Nash proposed a workable "bet", and you only proposed an unworkable one. If your are scared, say you're scared. (Sorry, had to continue with the Middle School theme.)

Apparently he didn't get ejected...he's batting. HF 1-0. LCM coming to bat in bottom of 4th.

Something we agree on 100%.

What exactly did Russia do to make you so upset? Honest question. The only thing I've heard is that they spent a few thousand dollars on Facebook ads and stole John Podesta's emails. Maybe there is more to it. If so, let me know. If that is it, it doesn't sound like a very sophisticated attack. I'm more concerned with the Chinese, who have tried (and continue to try) and many, many times successfully hacked every branch of our military, every government agency in existence, and many private U.S. companies. The company I'm at now gets anywhere from 100 to 15,000 foreign hack attempts per day. I don't really feel sorry for Podesta and the DNC for their lack of security. The same people tried hacking the RNC servers but were unsuccessful. If you have further knowledge about what steps Russia took in interfering in our election process, please let me know. After the Mueller scandal that has shown the corruption in the DOJ and FBI, just saying our intelligence agencies said that Russia interfered is no longer good enough in my opinion.

Enough of this thread. On to the next. What topic would like to continue your embarrassment?

I already won the bet. Are you getting upset? Is it nighty night time. Please don't tell me you are crying again. Don't be upset...just find a sixth grader to explain it to you and it will be alright.

I'm so sorry your analytical skills are not up to par for a simplified and straightforward example. To use condescension in such an obvious manner makes me the winner of the bet. I guess I will have to explain it. Forgive me if I can't clarify on such a simplistic level. You are trying to get Nash to make a bet. You said the bet involves fake money. But you said you will contribute the winnings to charity. Either you are using real money as the reward, or you are donating fake money to a charity. You might want to see if you can find your marbles. The laughter seems only to be just beginning. Care to embarrass yourself some more? If only Pete Rose would have sought out your counsel. He could have claimed he bet fake money on those games.

I would be willing to bet you a substantial amount of money (and I don't gamble) that you will make a childish statement within your next 3 posts. Yes, that surely is the easiest bet ever.

I think it is illegal to give "fake" money to a charity.

Nope, I just enjoy letting you expose your lack of confidence in your own abilities. And as a bonus, you treat us to your lack of comprehension skills. It's just too easy. Would you like to contribute another response revealing even more of your character faults? I actually proposed a wager that I could elicit a childish response from you. I'm not sure why he wouldn't accept that challenge. So I just did it for free. I'm not scared.