Englebert

Wow, this is comical. What does prior competitions have to do with the challenge that has been presented now? That's twice you've resorted to the "I'm not showing off my skills for free" ploy. Do you think anyone is buying that childish logic? Do you think anyone on here can't see through your obvious attempts to run from a simple little "workable" bet? Do you think anyone can't see that you are obviously scared? My only question is how in the world do you have no self-awareness of your immature behavior. It is entertaining for us though.

When the topic has ran it's course and the childish posts dominate, that's my cue to enter into the fray. Why do you think I'm on some many of your topics? Why are you running like a frightened schoolgirl from Nash's proposal? It's a very simple, logical, workable endeavor. But for some unknown reason (LOL), you choose to avoid the challenge by attaching unworkable "strings". Politicians use this tactic all the time. It's a childish way to avoid showing your true colors. So once again, if your scared, say your scared.

So you also chose to continue with the Middle School theme.

After being thoroughly humiliated on this topic, I'm surprised you have the gumption to bring it back to the forefront. Nash proposed a workable "bet", and you only proposed an unworkable one. If your are scared, say you're scared. (Sorry, had to continue with the Middle School theme.)

Apparently he didn't get ejected...he's batting. HF 1-0. LCM coming to bat in bottom of 4th.

Something we agree on 100%.

What exactly did Russia do to make you so upset? Honest question. The only thing I've heard is that they spent a few thousand dollars on Facebook ads and stole John Podesta's emails. Maybe there is more to it. If so, let me know. If that is it, it doesn't sound like a very sophisticated attack. I'm more concerned with the Chinese, who have tried (and continue to try) and many, many times successfully hacked every branch of our military, every government agency in existence, and many private U.S. companies. The company I'm at now gets anywhere from 100 to 15,000 foreign hack attempts per day. I don't really feel sorry for Podesta and the DNC for their lack of security. The same people tried hacking the RNC servers but were unsuccessful. If you have further knowledge about what steps Russia took in interfering in our election process, please let me know. After the Mueller scandal that has shown the corruption in the DOJ and FBI, just saying our intelligence agencies said that Russia interfered is no longer good enough in my opinion.

Enough of this thread. On to the next. What topic would like to continue your embarrassment?

I already won the bet. Are you getting upset? Is it nighty night time. Please don't tell me you are crying again. Don't be upset...just find a sixth grader to explain it to you and it will be alright.

I'm so sorry your analytical skills are not up to par for a simplified and straightforward example. To use condescension in such an obvious manner makes me the winner of the bet. I guess I will have to explain it. Forgive me if I can't clarify on such a simplistic level. You are trying to get Nash to make a bet. You said the bet involves fake money. But you said you will contribute the winnings to charity. Either you are using real money as the reward, or you are donating fake money to a charity. You might want to see if you can find your marbles. The laughter seems only to be just beginning. Care to embarrass yourself some more? If only Pete Rose would have sought out your counsel. He could have claimed he bet fake money on those games.

I would be willing to bet you a substantial amount of money (and I don't gamble) that you will make a childish statement within your next 3 posts. Yes, that surely is the easiest bet ever.

I think it is illegal to give "fake" money to a charity.

Nope, I just enjoy letting you expose your lack of confidence in your own abilities. And as a bonus, you treat us to your lack of comprehension skills. It's just too easy. Would you like to contribute another response revealing even more of your character faults? I actually proposed a wager that I could elicit a childish response from you. I'm not sure why he wouldn't accept that challenge. So I just did it for free. I'm not scared.

Do you actually think you have a "gotcha" proposition here? You keep pressing like a little immature schoolboy, only to make the terms out of scope. If you are such a genius, why not make a gentlemen's wager? I'm still laughing that you tried that tired ol' "I'm too smart to display my skills for free" ploy. That was comical. It seems fairly certain you are scared? Nash has already stated that his work precludes him from wagering. Do you have any reason to doubt that statement? If so, call him out on that statement. Why do you incessantly try to submit an unworkable bet? It's pretty evident that you are scared and this is your way out. It's a common tactic. Go to any Middle School and you will see.

I just noticed you try to blame everything on Trump, but ignore the same actions from others, all in a condescending tone that deserves bewilderment. If interfering in a country's election makes you furious, you should want charges filed on Obama for interfering in the Israeli elections...but I have a feeling you will give him a pass.

How is your description of Trump on the subject of Russian voting interference any different than Obama's handling of Russian voting interference? TDS influenced? How is this board a microcosm of what the Russians hope to accomplish? Did the Russians influence our top DOJ and FBI officials to spy on a presidential candidate? Did the Russians influence top law enforcement officials to abuse the FISA system because the officials disliked the candidate the people chose? Did the Russians strongarm Obama into not rebuking them when evidence was abundant that they had hacked our military systems? Do you really think the political fighting started within the last election?

At 5:00pm on a Friday. Who would have guessed? And yes, let the fun begin. Either way, a lot of people will be sorely disappointed and a lot of people will be ecstatic. The spin doctors will be working overtime when the news is released.

Predicted.

Trump has copied and employs the Liberal style of "debate". It just seems very natural for you...inclusion to a tee.

A well earned monikor. You claim to be "enlightened". (Now that is funny) You try to stifle debate by insulting the other party. You make accusations that have no supporting evidence then run like a frightened schoolgirl when challenged to provide evidence. You practice the "rules for thee but not for me" doctrine. You insult anyone that doesn't share your views. You throw out baseless stereotypes. You attempt generalized insults based solely on one's geographical location. You show absolutely no shame when called out for your obvious mistakes. You whine like a little child when things don't go your way. You will never admit your mistakes, even when everyone around you is laughing at you. You try oh so hard to attempt "gotcha" questions, but fail miserably. (And again you show no shame.) You attempt to insult every GOP position and every person who claims to be Conservative. You don't know the difference between a Liberal and Leftist/Democrat. (Although you still claim to be enlightened.) You exude many, if not most, traits of Liberal "debating" tactics, and still get incensed when labeled a Liberal. You fit this group to a tee. You might as well move to San Francisco, don a mask, and roam the Berkley campus looking for individuals you and your group can attack from behind. Instead of providing evidence that these points are wrong, you will reply to this post in a very childish fashion. Disagree?

More deflection. Who would have guessed?

So again, you won't backup your claims as usual. Why do you run from such a simple question?

You've made this same accusation (directly in the other cases) on multiple occasions about me, stevenash, and the entire board. You have been asked repeatedly to show what has led you to this conclusion...and you always run from the question. This instance was just a continuation of all the other instances. So once again, can you backup your claims that we blindly follow any party? Will you continue to levy this accusation with zero evidence?

Would you care to show evidence of why you think stevenash blindly follows either party? What led you to this conclusion? History has shown that no answer will be forthcoming.

This "judge" needs to be held accountable. I suggest he must prove to his own court that Man-Made Global Warming is detrimental to Earth's health. Maybe he is the one that needs to be halted. It is really sickening to have a person in his position using an unproven theory on which to base his decisions. Maybe a 30 day timeout is in order for him to do a little soul searching on the importance of his job. Me personally, I think he needs to be removed from the bench immediately and permanently.