Englebert

Lame attempt of dodging. How embarrassing for you. You would be better served to back up your claims. I guess when you can't, this is your only option.

The same Twitter that banned American free speech. Not surprising. If you were the Owner or CEO of Twitter, would you ban Trump from Twitter? Since we are just throwing things out there, did you see a few weeks ago where Obama said that Trump was the one putting kids in cages. Did you see the media outrage over that outrageous lie. Me neither.

A baseless opinion from someone ate up with TDS. I guess you failed to quantify the constant media attacks against him (90+ percent negative coverage). Or the media ignoring/failing to give him credit for his many accomplishments. Yeah, Trump mentioning the Hunter Biden issue (which main stream media ignored and social media banned) was the reason he lost. Give me a break. Did it sound any more "intelligent" in your head when you where typing that trash?

Why would you claim this is a sign of TDS? Do you even know the meaning of TDS? The next time you feel like lambasting someone for what you think is a stupid post, reference back to this one. Your comment is comical and sad.

I do. And I can guarantee I'm not alone. In fact, you are probably in the minority on this argument. I can only imagine the outrage if one of Trump's kids was credibly accused of wrongdoing, and Trump's response when questioned was "I'm proud of my kid(s)". The TDS is rampant. Why do you accuse Trump of not focusing on his job? Can you lay out your argument as to why you came to that conclusion? Since you post on this forum, I guess I can make the claim that you are not focused on your job. Is this correct based on your logic? You seem to throw out a plethora of baseless allegations that you can't defend, then admonish others for discussing allegations based on published accounts. Are you throwing out another hair-brained conspiracy theory as to why Trump received less counted votes than Biden? Are you saying that if Trump would have not mentioned Hunter, he would have won? Why do you accuse others of discussing outlandish theories, then offer up your own?

Such a typical TDS rant. What behavior have I exhibited that leads you to come to the hilarious conclusion that I am the reason he fell short on counted votes? Please, use your mythical powers to come up with an answer. Once you can't, maybe you will realize you are just another low information, hate-filled spewer of TDS tainted opinions simultaneously accusing your counterparts of doing precisely what you yourself are guilty of. Now get to work on that evidence. (I have a feeling that your reply will be filled with generalized, rationalized, stereotypical Liberal edicts.)

How do you figure TDS describes his minions? Do you consider this a remotely cogent response? Your blind opinion formulated through other TDS partisan opinions...we get it.

Did you actually think this article has any merit? An opinion rant by an author ate up with TDS can only appreciated by the like-minded afflicted, I guess.

Maybe if Christine Blasey Ford said there was voter fraud then the main stream media would report it. Then again...they would probably just call her liar....or demand she prove it.

Did they have the information to find anything? Did the states provide the information needed? No they did not. Did the commission disband because they didn't find anything...as you suggested. No! So yes, fake news.

Fake news! The commission was not disbanded because they found nothing. It was disbanded because of States refusing to cooperate, chaos and in-fighting within the Commission, and the Commission facing many lawsuits. What is the definition of cultish again?

The way it has been for years is point differential first. Once that team is taken out of the equation, it goes head-to-head, in which case BH 2, PNG 3, Ned 4. I haven't been keeping up with high school football as much the last couple of years, so maybe something has changed.

I'm not too happy about this. I had East Bernard (#4 State ranked) winning the region in my Bracket, but Lexington (#4 District seed) beat them in the first round. I had Poth (#3 State ranked) losing to East Bernard in the Regional finals. I had Tidehaven beating Rogers in the first round. I had Buffalo losing in the 2nd round. Region 4 in my bracket is shot. Luckily a lot of people's bracket in our group looks as bad as mine.

That was the way it worked for most districts for years. Point differential determines the first spot, then head-to-head the next spot. Maybe they changed the system this year.

I'm pretty sure that if all three finish at 5-2, Barbers Hill will go as 2nd seed, Port Neches-Groves will be 3rd seed, and Nederland will be 4th seed. Barbers Hill will win on points differential to claim 2nd spot. Then it goes head-to-head between the two remaining...in which case PNG will claim the third spot, Nederland the 4th spot.

So I can only assume that is confirmation. You could at least muster a big ol' yellow smiley face with that post.

Is this the intellectual banter we can now expect from someone that cried like a baby and screamed at the sky for the last four years?

Just an observation. 6 of the 8 teams receiving forfeits are State ranked. 3 of them are ranked #1 in the State.

Short-sighted? Wow, your analytical skills are not up to snuff. How in the world do you conclude that I think illegal immigration is going to stop. You must have concluded that or you wouldn't have made that statement. That's flailing wildly. Short sightedness is protecting/coddling a group that has defied your laws and expecting them to love/respect/admire you in return. Like you, I've also heard about immigration reform since I was a kid. Neither party will do anything about it, which I'm sure you are well aware of. I've been saying for twenty years or more that if you fine/jail the citizens that hire the illegals, you can practically end the problem. If you take away the incentives for illegals to come here, they won't come. Increasing incentives increases immigration. I don't think that people here, new or old, want to be a part of a country that selectively enforces their laws. That is exactly why many of them come here...fairness. So which do I choose...the nation of laws..enforced equally. Which sadly, is far from what is happening. Do you actually consider appeasement a viable solution? How do you think those negatively affected feel when people defying U.S. laws are coddled? Let's keep on the theme of short-sightedness. Well maybe not really short-sightedness, but along those lines. I'm still baffled, and you haven't explained your rationale, as to why you think Conservatives/Republicans demonize immigrants. You might have a valid reason. I would sure love to hear it.

I'm baffled as to why you keep saying Republicans are demonizing illegals. That is simply false. Some do, most do not. If someone takes up residence in your house, I'm sure you will do everything possible to get them out. That doesn't me you hate them or want to demonize them. That is the way most Republicans feel. Saying you want them out doesn't equate to demonization. The topic is on what laws/benefits apply to illegals. I'm not sure why you keep bringing legal immigrants to the forefront. Conflating to make a point? I guess Republicans should pander to illegals if we give them the right to vote. So let's try again. Which laws apply and which benefits should be afforded illegal (again, illegal) people residing "illegally" in this country? I would put your number 3 point to Point number one. I strongly agree with this point, and agree it should have happened a long time ago. In fact, I think if this point was enforced, every other point would be mute. But since this is not being enforced, topics like this must exist. I don't agree with a path to citizenship. Personally I would like to pass a law that says that if you get caught residing in the United States illegally then you will be deported and you are permanently ineligible to ever become a U.S. citizen. I don't agree with any benefits for illegals. Ever. Come in legally and you can get them.

Yes, there is a decision to be made. I agree that people here illegally are afforded some basic rights. But are they afforded everything a legal person is afforded? Should a person here illegally be given the right to obtain a License to Carry permit? Or a driver's license? Or a identity card? If all laws apply to people regardless of status, shouldn't everyone be allowed Social Security, Obamacare, the right to vote, etc., etc., etc. So there is a decision to be made: what laws apply to people and what laws apply to citizens. If Single Payer healthcare is implemented, should all "people" get free healthcare or should "citizens" get free healthcare? (I was laughing when I typed the word "free"...twice.) The whole point of this topic is exactly what decision is to be made. Open borders coinciding with free college, free healthcare, free monetary (State/Federal) assistance, etc. cannot stand. If no decision is to be made, where are we heading? On a side note, I'm really surprised you sunk to stereotyping Conservative/Republicans. Very few (and none on this board that I have seen) demonize the immigrant population. Most want and are okay with LEGAL immigration. I don't know anyone that demonizes legal immigrants. And furthermore, I don't know of anyone that demonizes illegal immigrants. I know many who want to stop the flow of ILLEGAL immigrants. This is still a nation of laws. Very, very few "demonize" the illegal for being a person. I'm baffled as to why you channel an obvious liberal slander against Conservative/Republicans.

Should people residing in the United States illegally be given the right to bear arms? Should the United States allow foreign invaders to break our laws then legally arm themselves? Or restated, should hard working undocumented people trying to better themselves and their family be afforded the ultimate opportunity to protect themselves/family from unsolicited attack? What do you think? Should illegals be given the right to bear arms? (I thought about this topic years ago, but never posted it. While renewing my LTC today, I thought about it again. Today is as good a day as any...maybe better.)

I did a quick DuckDuckGo search using the phrase "voter fraud in Pennsylvania" (the title of this topic). I didn't even read the articles, but here are the links to the first few: [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] etc., etc., etc. There are more instances of voter fraud stories in Pennsylvania than unarmed Black men being killed by police in the whole United States. So shouldn't we consider voter fraud an epidemic in Pennsylvania? Whose lies? Voter fraud is negligible? What makes you think that? If you don't try to catch the cheaters, not many will be caught. If you look at the number of speeding tickets issued, you would get the idea that the amount of people speeding on the highways is negligible. Now go out on I-10, drive the speed limit, and count how many cars pass you versus how many cars you pass...or even keep up with. Speeding is negligible though.

20-13 OT Orangefield Final.