bullets13

This sort of thing has been his MO since he was posting as Smitty.

[Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] from the article: A new CDC reportTrusted Source shows that since July 26, there have been only 6,587 reports of breakthrough infections that resulted in hospitalization or death among 163 million fully vaccinated people — a percentage of 0.01 percent or less.

I’m more referring to the numbers local hospitals are releasing that show that around 90% of their Covid patients are unvaccinated, around 95% of their ICU cases are unvaccinated, and around 99% of their ventilator cases are unvaccinated. And I’ve seen similar numbers from various hospitals all over the country.

I can see not trusting the government or the fda, but I have a hard time believing that all hospitals everywhere are falsifying numbers in a giant conspiracy to convince people to get the shot.

Here are my thoughts: maybe it works, maybe it doesn’t. If people want to use it, go for it. I hope that it helps them, truly. I think the way the media is portraying it is really irresponsible, but typical. They’re labeling it strictly as a horse dewormer, and portraying people who are trying it as morons, and I don’t think this is fair. THAT SAID… I also have a problem with the same people who criticize the vaccine for being “experimental” and “not approved by the FDA” going and buying doses made for livestock and injecting it in their bodies. Ivermectin is NOT approved by the FDA for Covid use, and the use of it right now is the true definition of experimental. I would like to see studies done on hospitalizations and deaths to see how many of those people have used ivermectin as treatments or preventatives. Hospitals are putting out numbers right now that show clear correlations between being unvaccinated and being hospitalized and dying. Do the same thing with ivermectin.

Your thoughts?

Lucas 58 POP 10

According to MP: Houston The Village 90 Houston Lutheran North 50

Episcopal School of Dallas 28 Addison Trinity Christian 14

Yeah, they played pretty well. Nice to see the new QBs come in and do well. Whittington had himself a game as well.

For scores that aren’t updated by fans on here we have to rely on sites like maxpreps. Sometimes they’re inaccurate. I updated probably 25 scores from maxpreps week one, and this makes 2 that were inaccurate. Well, this score was correct, they just put that it went to OT

It seems less likely you’ll get it, but the numbers of vaccinated getting sick is definitely growing. Totally agree, though. The local hospitals have been posting numbers and the difference in vaccinated and non vaccinated being hospitalized is tremendous

She was driving like she was drunk. I'll admit I didn't care enough to watch the whole video. I'd guess she was probably texting or something.

At my hospital, over 95% of COVID-19 patients share one thing in common: They’re unvaccinated (msn.com)

I think this is spot on. I also think most people who are pro-life (and pro-choice, for that matter), are not willing to put their money where their mouth is. Not too many folks out there are donating money to those causes, or tithing 10% (or even close to that) to allow churches afford to help out. We live in a very selfish society these days, where everyone has strong opinions, but not many people back it up with charitable actions. I may be on the opposite side of the abortion debate as you, but I would definitely prefer this be the answer to the problem.

I'm not saying liberals care about them. the majority of people on both sides don't care about them. but only one side is demanding they be born.

again, that's the point. so many conservatives don't care about them once they're born. are they not still pure then?

We've had this debate before, and a lot of people were "very disappointed" in me. I don't have an issue with a woman terminating a non-viable fetus while it's in her body. It's not something I agree with morally, but it's not something I think anyone has the right to tell a woman not to do. Where do you stop? Why is it okay for a man to wear a condom, or a woman to take birth control? Think of all the potential babies they're killing. Where in the bible did God say it was okay to have a vasectomy or a hysterectomy. Why do conservatives get to determine the cutoff of when it's acceptable to end potential life? Why do they fight so hard to force at-risk, impoverished mothers to have these children, and then fight so hard to not contribute to helping them financially through government programs. And then get to say things like "you should've been more responsible", or "carry it for nine months and give it up for adoption". It's really just such a ridiculous argument to me. A bunch of dudes sitting around telling women what they should have to do with their own bodies when they get pregnant. A bunch of dudes sitting around and coming up with their own made up rules as to what's acceptable and what isn't in terms of birth control. There's a reason that predominately republican supreme courts haven't touched this issue.

bingo.

it's a lot easier to talk on these issues with such certainty when you don't.

Agree. Planned Parenthood is one of these places.

Seems like you would've preferred nine old white guys telling women what they CANNOT do with their body?

Maga isn't wrong, though. The vast majority of the people I know who are strongly pro-life are the same ones that are strongly against providing financial support for those babies after they're born.

To me it’s kinda like the gun buyback programs. Nobody is turning in a gun for a little bit of money if they want the gun, and nobody is getting the shot for $100 that wasn’t already ready to get the shot. It’s unrealistic to offer a cash incentive large enough to convince someone who doesn’t want to get the shot. If you offered $1500, and someone could pay their house and car notes for a month, I could see someone changing their mind and getting the shot. But $100? That’s not going to make anybody take a shot that they already felt was so risky that they wouldn’t get it for free.

Also a reasonable response.