WOSgrad

Carthage wins Gm 1, 11-0

Matt Faye‏ @mattGfaye 3m3 minutes ago FINAL: Livingston 10, Silsbee softball 3 #BEScores Game 2 tomorrow night in Livingston at 6pm.

Cecil‏ @wstiger69 32s33 seconds ago @WOSgrad @etsnfm @kfdmsports @KLTVSports @Beaumont_Sports @JeremyOBThomas The West Sabine Lady Tigers take game 2 of their bi-district series with Colmesneil 10-0 in five innings to move on to the next round...

Final, Orangefield 6, Corrigan-Camden 3

Going to the Bottom of the 7th, Lady Bobcats lead 6-3

4A Bi District Softball Game 1: Huntington 12, Fairfield 0 Huntington leads best of 3, 1-0

Speaking of which, I now notice that you now need team admin permission to view the BC JV info, LOL!

Lady Bobcats lead 6-3 after 6

You're right. Forgive me, the correct term is libel as it is written word Just because the folks are too goodnatured to be bothered with the litigation doesn't mean that your beloved Mr. Klein has not committed the offense. I confirmed the report about Ozen was liberlous as I directly contacted then-AD at Barbers Hill Ronnie Gage who assured me had no damage to their visitor locker room, as your beloved Mr. Klein had alleged in an article that I believe you posted here. In fact, I recall posting Coach Gage's email response in its entirety. Thus your beloved Mr. Klein published an allegation that was false, which is actionable defamation under tort law. I confirmed the report was slander with the UIL who new of no investigation as to any athletic program in this area. So his allegations there are equal libel. And then we now come to your beloved Mr. Klein's latest foray into the world of libel with regard to these communications, as well as his allegations last week that signs which described what the It is covered in Texas Election Code, Section 255.003 which states: Section 255.003. UNLAWFUL USE OF PUBLIC FUNDS FOR POLITICAL ADVERTISING (a) An officer or employee of a political subdivision may not knowingly spend or authorize the spending of public funds for political advertising. (b) Subsection (a) does not apply to a communication that factually describes the purposes of a measure if the communication does not advocate passage or defeat of the measure. So, as to Superintendent Perez: How exactly do her e-mails violate the above Section? They merely provide encouragement to vote on the measure, they certainly do not advocate passage or defeat of the measure. So for Mr. Klein to allege that either the signs he show in his "Top Story" last week or the emails of Ms. Perez were the commission of a felony (which in itself is libel as violation of this provision is a Class A misdemeanor as stated in Sec. 255.003 (c)) does indeed meet the standards of actionable libel. As to Ms. Bell, I think the story at least acknowledges that she is not an employee of a political subdivision. For her to use her private e-mail account to send e-mails to teachers of Nederland ISD whose email addresses are available to the viewing public, is not use of government computers and of government databases. You do not need a JD (which, yes, I do happen to have) to find this information. In fact, the Texas Ethics Commission has quite a handy pamphlet in circulation which was rather easy to find: [Hidden Content] So, in summary, your correct.....it isn't slander (spoken defamation)....it is libel (written defamation). I have shown examples of his commission of such transgressions, both in the past and in the present. As I stated earlier, due to his constant aversion to the truth, no links to Mr Klein's paper shall be used in this forum. You have been reminded of that and I will take any posting of links to his paper as you willful intent to ignore the prohibition.

I've heard that kind of talk since I attended there in the mid 80's. This is despite the fact all of those kids who were supposedly recruited are sons, brothers, cousins or nephews of folks I attended WO-S with. They want to say that to somehow dismiss WO-S' success or to explain their school's failure.

The report was for using player that was ineligible due to an incomplete on his report card.

That's fine, LC-M has managed 1 win on the gridiron against WO-S since then. BTW, the forfeitures in 1992 were not due to "recruiting violations."

Well, whoever did report showed the 22-4A DEC evidence that warranted that BC forfeit 3 games. That is really the only thing that counts. If he did (and again, my source did say it was)........SO WHAT? As I said last night, it could be argued that he had a duty under UIL rules to report it on finding out. There was no finding that whoever reported the violations withheld the information after finding out. Whoever reported it certainly, according to the vote of the 22-4A DEC, did not report false allegations. So all of the talk of who reported it is really neither here nor there. In fact, the talk being entirely in that direction would normally cause me to close a thread like this. However, as I was reminded last night, this is the most activity that has been in the forum all freaking season!

Well, I figured since the $2.99 gives you everything that the premium does, I'd prefer to use the $5 to go toward a burger over at Ricky's.

It is playoff time for the Orangefield Lady Bobcats as they take on the Corrigan-Camden Lady Bulldogs in this Class 3A Bi-District One Game Playoff! Rebekah Ragdale's Lady Bobcats were runner ups in District 22-3A while the Lady Bulldogs were the #3 seed out of District 21-3A. The winner of this series will face the winner of the Van Vleck/New Waverly series. Join Gary Stelly for all of the action from Jasper High School by tuning your radio to AM 1600 KOGT or by clicking on the following link: [Hidden Content]

Nope, all it takes is a $2.99/month subscription to Game Changer

LOL! This was not a self report.

First of all, I am QUITE sure that I had barred any posting of idiot Klein's paper here due to his slanderous articles in the past about local athletic programs (Ozen messing up the locker room after a bi-district game with Barbers Hill and, most recently, the allegations that 3 different athletic programs in the area were being investigated on recruiting allegations). Second, what laws were broken here? Superintendent Perez sending voting information for early voting. Sorry pal, that's legal. No advocacy for or against the bond so it is allowed under election laws. As for Ms. Bell, there is no showing that the emails originated from government computer. That is like saying that the email questionnaire that I will be sending to Coach Barrow (you know, the coach you love to hate) in a couple of weeks is use of a government computer. And I found his email address on the Nederland ISD, that is not illegal use of a government database. It is again Philip Klein doing what he does best, posting slanderous nonsense, half truths and outright lies......much like you have done on this thread.

Game 2 of a Class 5A b-district best of 3 series from Barbers Hill High School in Mont Belvieu at 5:30 pm. Barbers Hill leads this series 1-0 The winner of this series will face the winner of the Richmond Foster/Houston Northside series.

Class 5A bi-district game from Friendswood High School at 6:30 pm The winner of this game will face the winner of the Houston Milby/Manvel winner.

Game 1 of a Class 5A bi-district best of 3 series from Nederland High School in Nederland at 6:30 pm The winner of this series will face the winner of the Angleton/Houston Waltrip winner.

Game 1 of a Class 4A Bi-District best of 3 series from Grand Saline High School at 6 The winner of this series will face the winner of the Venus/Gatesville series.

Game 1 of a Class 4A bi-district best of 3 series from Hudson High School in Lufkin at 6 The winner of this series will face the winner of the Alvarado/China Spring series.

ttt

Game 1 of a Class 4A bi-district best of 3 series from Silsbee High School at 6 The winner of this series will face the winner of the Houston Scarborough/Brazosport series.