Jump to content

Cougtalk

Members
  • Posts

    4,619
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Cougtalk last won the day on August 25 2024

Cougtalk had the most liked content!

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. You just took 3 tries to get 2.5 yards.
  2. It would have still objectively been a bad call and it's a bad call because you took the certain points off the board. Not sure where you come from but where i come from we were always taught a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. If he had originally decided to go for 2 to win it (Like Friendswood did) and lost then that fine, but when you have a tie game you cannot untie the game to try and go for two everything about the decision was nonsense, if he had succeeded we would of course be happy with a second round game, but it would have still been the objectively incorrect decision. I asked a buddy who does some stats work for Northwestern what the data says and his exact words were nothing is more statistically valuable then guaranteed points. So under no old coach model (traditional) or stats model (modern) is this the correct call to make. Also, grandpa knew better and he never coached a day in his life but had more life experience than any of these coaches dreamed of having.
  3. Did they miss the PAT or go for 2?
  4. Three losing seasons, 2 back to back first round exits, non-competitive with the top of the district. This is not Crosby football it feels like I'm watching PAM from 6-7 years ago? All that talent being wasted.
  5. What a joke of a choke job by that play caller you do not take points off the board, so bad.
  6. If we are any better than we were last year and I think offensively we are because we aren't so one dimensional then we have a shot, what worries me is the 7 point 2nd half versus La Porte.
  7. Glad we took care of business and didn't look ahead to next week. looking like we will be playing for 2nd in the district right now .
  8. Beats the heck out of an ugly loss...
  9. Nah Berneathy and that staff are the real threats our adjustment tend to be minor to non-existent.
  10. Heck of a game so far, my angle on that Robinson Run was he was in which hurts that we didn't get points there but big defensive stop to end the 2nd. We need some more big plays but Joe for joes we can matchup with this LP team. But worried about what that extremely good staff at LP is going to cook up in half time but good 1st half.
  11. Is Crosby actually smaller this alignment? Maybe I'm misremembering but weren't we 2091 at last realignment and 2090 now edit nevermind misremembered we were 1904 last realignment.
  12. TBF our offense stats versus Pasadena aren't that crazy we returned multiple kicks, picks and other tunrovers for very short yardage or TD's so I wouldn't be surpised if the offensive numbers looked pedestrian for that one.
  13. Seems Friendswood was tired of the losing after playing the top 3 teams in district to start the year.
  14. Crosby is clearly the underdog in this one. we need all three phases to be in synch to win this one, we don't win a shootout we need to control the ball shrink the game get big plays if we are going to win this one. if we can take the top off the defense it might open up the run in reality that has to happen. one wrinkle is last year the coaching staff installed a ton of RPO versus La Porte last year so is there a wrinkle this year? it did not work last year but history is history right?
×
×
  • Create New...