Jump to content

Beaumont Kelly vs. Bridge City Game Thread/BC wins


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

[quote name="WOSgrad" post="1053796" timestamp="1315630661"]
Final, Bridge City 20, Kelly 7
[/quote]

I had Kelly in this one, but I knew it could go either way, I just thought Kelly's running game could keep them in it.
Props to the Cards for the big win......Menard and company are tough to stop no doubt!!!!
Good game Cardinals.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bridge City's defense played very good. There offense was average at best. Give credit to Kelly's defense other than a few plays they kept Bridge City's running game pretty much in check all night. They gave up a few big pass plays but overall they played very tough on defense. Both offenses need work. Bridge City will struggle against the teams they will have to beat to make the playoffs if there offense does not improve a lot. I know the coach is in love with the spread but I would put dishon at QB and menard and clark in the backfield, with the size of their O line menard will not be able to throw from the pocket, they will have to roll him out most every pass play and its my opinion only but I feel menard has trouble throwing on the run.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both teams played great i didnt agree with that fumble call early in the game. Thought it should have been a incomplete pass. And that run by Kenebrew was RIDICULOUS i wish they had it on kfdm tonight.

Two BAD throws by Kelly that ended drives headed towards touchdowns one on bridge citys 20 and one on their 40.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,977
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • We'll see. I don't trust us. 
    • Starting pitching has been shaky the last few weeks due to some injuries outside of Hagen Smith.  He goes tomorrow, so y’all should be fine 
    • Manchin may get it but any mention of the radical left that wanted to get rid of the filibuster and end almost 220 years of history because the Democrats are mad?  The House and Senate are obviously different legislative bodies with entirely different election processes and rules for a reason. The House can vote on laws with a simple majority vote. The Senate put rules in place that it would make it much tougher to pass laws. Laws should be difficult to pass. The Senate is often the holdup of the right and left. It takes 60 votes to break the filibuster so any law will almost certainly require agreement at least in part, from opposing sides of an issue. Because they can’t get laws passed, the radical left is like a baby having a tantrum and wants to change over 200 years of history and make it potentially ridiculously easy to pass laws. I have seen current poll maps and it is possible for the Republicans to sweep into complete power in November but by the tiniest margin. That would possibly mean that a single vote margin in both houses could enact what you might call the radical right laws. There would be nothing that the Democrats could do to stop any legislation whatsoever if the left (they are all radical, minus Manchin) got their filibuster rule changed.  That is where the current filibuster comes into play as any new law would require several Democrats to agree with the majority Republicans and vice versa.  Do you want the potential for your radical right to have free rein as the radical left wants by killing the filibuster or is the radical left just as (if not more) dangerous? Let’s see if we have a history in this area? Oh yeah, the Democrats changed the rules in the Senate to allow federal judges to not have to overcome the filibuster. Obama was not getting his federal judge nominations passed and being angry, they changed the rules instead of nominating more moderate justices. They were warned that it would come back to bite them. They didn’t care and chose the nuclear option to change the rules. Oops! Any guess how Trump got all of his Supreme Court nominees passed against strong Democrat opposition? The Democrats got rid of the filibuster for federal judges after another tantrum   So when you are so worried about the radical right, are you equally concerned in what the radical left is always doing by changing rules and history which were put into place just for situations like we are in? So while Manchin gets it, what about his other 50 colleagues (49 + Harris)?  What concerns you more, Abbott and Paxton or the Democrats who want to make it to where if the Republicans do take over, they can go wild… at least in your mind? 
    • MODS please remove that ISD twitter link! I had no idea it would copy the whole posting. I only highlighted the portion about the venue change. Sorry about that!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...