Jump to content

*Kountze vs. Warren Updates* Warren Wins/Comments


Recommended Posts

The guys were right to walk off the field,if the coach does not have the Balls to stand up and do whats right, the three players did. I know their parents are proud of them


Wrong. the players were not right to walk off the field. If a playere wants to quit the team then they should, but they should never have packed thier gear and walked out of the dugout in front of the stands and back to the locker room. They should have stayed in the dug out and not taken the field. The players made a commitment to their teammates. Just because the disagreed with something the coach did they should have NEVER walked like they did. By the way there were four players that walked off and a 5'th who walked out but went back.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="Justafan1" post="789101" timestamp="1271074125"]
The guys were right to walk off the field,if the coach does not have the Balls to stand up and do whats right, the three players did. I know their parents are proud of them


Wrong. the players were not right to walk off the field. If a playere wants to quit the team then they should, but they should never have packed thier gear and walked out of the dugout in front of the stands and back to the locker room. They should have stayed in the dug out and not taken the field. The players made a commitment to their teammates. Just because the disagreed with something the coach did they should have NEVER walked like they did. By the way there were four players that walked off and a 5'th who walked out but went back.
[/quote]

Well said!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The players that walked off in the middle of the game against Wareen should never be allowed to ever play sports again.  That's not the way to embarrass yourselves and their school.  if they had a problem with the coach and his decisions, they should have finished the game and then spoke with the coach in private about their issues.  Walking off the field not only embarassed them but their school as well.  Has the day come when parents are encouraging their children that if something happens that you don't agree with you should just quit?  Well all that I can say is they will have a lengthy employment record because they are going to have bosses that are going to make them mad and they will just walk off the job.  These students have to learn.  There will be people they will encounter the rest of their lives that will make them mad and disapoint them. They have to learn to deal with them.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

kids want to win....if the kids didnt talk to the coach then yes it was a bad move on their part.  on the other hand if the kids have already talked to coach and nothing happened, then yeah they have the right to walk off the field.  lets not blame the kids so fast for walking off the field there had to be something more that we arent getting to this story for that to happen.  
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="im on fire" post="789210" timestamp="1271094738"]
kids want to win....if the kids didnt talk to the coach then yes it was a bad move on their part.  on the other hand if the kids have already talked to coach and nothing happened, then yeah they have the right to walk off the field.  lets not blame the kids so fast for walking off the field there had to be something more that we arent getting to this story for that to happen.  
[/quote] I respectfully disagree.....to walk off the field in the middle of a competition because you or your teammates disagree with the coach is not right.  It should have been handled after the game or even before if this is a problem that has been building up.  Trying to show the coach up to prove a point is disrespectful to the school, teammates, the opposing team, fans and coaches....But unfortunately these are the times we now live in.....sad...I hope it works out for all parties involved...Good Luck Lions...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have a dog in this hunt but from what I have heard those young men took a stand the coach should have taken. It's sad when the kids have to be the moral barometer in a situation instead of the adult. If I were their parents I would be very proud that they had the courage to do the right thing. I think the coach's decision should be the topic of discussion not what a few brave young men had the courage to do. You guys stood up for what you believe in and sometimes when you do you are questioned by those who would never have the courage to take a stand.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • High Point walks it off.  Vandy Whistler headed home!
    • Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  
    • Wake is about to go from Preseason #1 to the 1st team eliminated 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...