Jump to content

LETS TALK ABOUT YOUR JV


skipper

Recommended Posts

Baytown Lee's jv is pretty decent I think. They are 3-2 the best I can remember. Lee rarely has anyone on JV though that will ever do much on varsity. Any good underclassmen are already on varsity. The freshman team is the place to look for Lee's future. Lee's freshman A is 4-1, and they have quite a few good athletes that should be contributors, some as early as next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Judging JV teams can be tricky. If the JV is successful, but are made up of predominantly Juniors then that doesn't necessarily translate into a succesful varsity. If they are predominantly Sophomores, then they could translate into success. I agree with someone earlier who posted that it's best to keep an eye on the freshman teams, if they are all kept together, which most schools do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HF jv is made up about 1/2 soph and juniors. They all are ok players but most are undersized for their positions. Our better players (sophs) who would have been on this team are on varsity because of their speed and are starting. Probably the best three jv players are on Offense. The QB was a starting WR on varsity. Made plays when he got touches but we haven't thrown the ball well on varsity. He was sent down and allowed to play QB. He is very fast and athletic. He did real well against HJs jv. We also had a soph RB that was sent down to get reps. Hes undersized but fast and instinctive. The running ability of the QB has opened lanes for him to run up the middle. We have a junior WR who should have played varsity but was overlooked by the coaches because of his short stature. He is very fast, athletic, and catches everything thrown his way. I'm unsure of the win lost record. But just as the others have said in the other posts its hard to gauge good play on jv because if the players were real good they probably would be on varsity playing or backups. That all depends on the depth ahead of them. I anticipate a few of these guys getting called up to varsity if we continue to lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wos jv is 5-0 and 1-0 in district coming off an impressive win against newtons jv last week and newton had about 8 or 9 varsity players with them since they were off last week this week jv will play in hardin jefferson

The WOS and Dayton JV game was a good one.

WOS 14 - Dayton 6

Lots of speed on the field, low scoring, excellent game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hj's jv is not horrible.....

7-0 vs bridge city

20-6 vs hamshire fannett

beat ec

lost two other close ones to cleveland and anahuac

What has hurt have been fumbles. The D has played pretty good and the offense has moved the ball in every game... A little in experience in a few sports, but they will be ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
Guest Bucman08

hj's jv is not horrible.....

7-0 vs bridge city

20-6 vs hamshire fannett

beat ec

lost two other close ones to cleveland and anahuac

What has hurt have been fumbles.  The D has played pretty good and the offense has moved the ball in every game...  A little in experience in a few sports, but they will be ok.

          NO THEY LOST TO EC 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
    • Classic Bridge City.  Always someone else's fault, refs/umpires cheated, AD with an agenda, yada, yada, yada.  As far as I can tell it's damn near impossible to get fired at these schools so when someone does get fired, it's usually something.  Drama at Bridge City is a constant.  The guy did a good job coaching basketball and I'm sure he'll continue that somewhere else.  Time to move on.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...