Jump to content

Good One...


baddog

Recommended Posts


Brilliant and Just response!

 
This policeman was being cross-examined by a defense attorney during a felony trial. 

The lawyer was trying to undermine the police officer's credibility... 

Q:  'Officer, did you see my client fleeing the scene?' 
A:  'No sir.  But I subsequently observed a person matching the description of the offender, running several blocks away.'

Q:  'Officer -- who provided this description?' 
A:  'The officer who responded to the scene.' 

Q:  'A fellow officer provided the description of this so-called offender.  Do you trust your fellow officers?' 
A:  'Yes sir.  With my life.'

Q:  'With your life?  Let me ask you this then, Officer.  Do you have a room where you change your clothes in preparation for your daily duties?'
A:  'Yes sir, we do!'

Q:  'And do you have a locker in the room?' 
A:  'Yes sir, I do.'

Q:  'And do you have a lock on your locker?'
A:  'Yes sir.'

Q:  'Now why is it, officer, if you trust your fellow officers with your life, you find it necessary to lock your locker in a room you share with these same officers?' 
A:  'You see, sir -- we share the building with the court complex, and sometimes lawyers have been known to walk through that room.'

The courtroom EXPLODED with laughter, and a prompt recess was called. 
The officer on the stand has been nominated for this year's 'Best Comeback' line.








Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...

A man with a gun goes into a bank and demands their
money. Once he is given the money, he turns to a
customer and asks, "Did you see me rob this bank?"

The man replied, "Yes sir, I did."

The robber then shot him, killing him instantly.

He then turned to a couple standing next in line and
asks,

"Did you see me rob this bank?"

The woman replied, "No sir, I didn't, but my husband did."
Link to comment
Share on other sites


A man goes to his doctor for a complete check-up. He hasn't been feeling well and wants to find out if he's ill. After the check-up the doctor comes out with the results of the examination. "I'm afraid I have some bad news. You're dying and you don't have much time," the doctor says. "Oh no, that's terrible. How long have I got?" the man asks. "Ten..." says the doctor. "Ten? Ten what? Months? Weeks? What?!" says the man. The doctor says, "Ten, nine, eight, seven..."
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,977
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • We'll see. I don't trust us. 
    • Starting pitching has been shaky the last few weeks due to some injuries outside of Hagen Smith.  He goes tomorrow, so y’all should be fine 
    • Manchin may get it but any mention of the radical left that wanted to get rid of the filibuster and end almost 220 years of history because the Democrats are mad?  The House and Senate are obviously different legislative bodies with entirely different election processes and rules for a reason. The House can vote on laws with a simple majority vote. The Senate put rules in place that it would make it much tougher to pass laws. Laws should be difficult to pass. The Senate is often the holdup of the right and left. It takes 60 votes to break the filibuster so any law will almost certainly require agreement at least in part, from opposing sides of an issue. Because they can’t get laws passed, the radical left is like a baby having a tantrum and wants to change over 200 years of history and make it potentially ridiculously easy to pass laws. I have seen current poll maps and it is possible for the Republicans to sweep into complete power in November but by the tiniest margin. That would possibly mean that a single vote margin in both houses could enact what you might call the radical right laws. There would be nothing that the Democrats could do to stop any legislation whatsoever if the left (they are all radical, minus Manchin) got their filibuster rule changed.  That is where the current filibuster comes into play as any new law would require several Democrats to agree with the majority Republicans and vice versa.  Do you want the potential for your radical right to have free rein as the radical left wants by killing the filibuster or is the radical left just as (if not more) dangerous? Let’s see if we have a history in this area? Oh yeah, the Democrats changed the rules in the Senate to allow federal judges to not have to overcome the filibuster. Obama was not getting his federal judge nominations passed and being angry, they changed the rules instead of nominating more moderate justices. They were warned that it would come back to bite them. They didn’t care and chose the nuclear option to change the rules. Oops! Any guess how Trump got all of his Supreme Court nominees passed against strong Democrat opposition? The Democrats got rid of the filibuster for federal judges after another tantrum   So when you are so worried about the radical right, are you equally concerned in what the radical left is always doing by changing rules and history which were put into place just for situations like we are in? So while Manchin gets it, what about his other 50 colleagues (49 + Harris)?  What concerns you more, Abbott and Paxton or the Democrats who want to make it to where if the Republicans do take over, they can go wild… at least in your mind? 
    • MODS please remove that ISD twitter link! I had no idea it would copy the whole posting. I only highlighted the portion about the venue change. Sorry about that!
    • See why I don't trust my Hogs?
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...