If a man wonāt take care of the ones heās fathered, why should he be allowed to keep on having them? Naturally, as a close minded male you donāt consider the fact that oftentimes lack of access to abortion will result in the woman no longer being able to bear children, so whatās the difference? Lack of choice is lack of choice. Ā Look, Iām going kind of Johnathan Swift Ā on this one because the whole issue is just that bizarre. It boils down to the woman (or manās) choice. Why would you want the State in the bedroom more than you want it in the boardroom?
Recommended Posts