AggiesAreWe Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago Looking at scores from across the state but even just our coverage area, there were way too many blowouts in these first rounds. Of our 9 coverage area games last night, only one was competitive. (#3 seed Palestine Westwood beat #2 Anahuac 41-27). All the other games were complete blowouts. (well maybe not SA/UG as it was 33-7 but SA led the whole game and UG only scored with a minute left in game) 6 of the 9 games teams scored 60+. 4 scored 70+. The average margin of victory in the 9 games was 50 points. Take out the Anahuac/WW game and it's 54 points. Six of the nine games last night were #1 vs. #4. (technically the DP/NS game wasn't but NS is the #1 DI seed). All of those games were not competitive. Those scores: 62-14, 70-0, 70-0, 33-7, 75-14, 68-19. My point (and one that I have had all along) is the playoffs are too watered down. I never liked a 4th team being added to playoffs. Particularly when that 4th team comes from a district with just 4, 5, or 6 teams. I just don't think as a whole, you get a quality team going that far down in a district. Yes I know there are outliers. (have been some 4 seeds make it deep in playoffs) But the vast majority get their butt whipped (like last night) in the 1st round. Call me old school, but I liked it when it was just 2 teams. Rant over. 1970 and KF89 2 Quote
Mr. Buddy Garrity Posted 57 minutes ago Report Posted 57 minutes ago Glad I watched EP Pebble Hills vs Midland Lee. 😁 Quote
AHUDDLESTON Posted 34 minutes ago Report Posted 34 minutes ago I was just thinking the same thing. Brock won 77 - 7. This was not a run up the score game. Brock had 8 possessions on offense. 6 of the 8 were one play drives for TD. One 5 play drive td in first half and 7 play drive for td in second half. Returned two punts and one interception for TDs. Clock only stopped in second half for the change of quarter. 63 points on 10 offensive plays in the first half. Mr. Buddy Garrity and AggiesAreWe 2 Quote
Mr. Buddy Garrity Posted 33 minutes ago Report Posted 33 minutes ago 1 minute ago, AHUDDLESTON said: I was just thinking the same thing. Brock won 77 - 7. This was not a run up the score game. Brock had 8 possessions on offense. 6 of the 8 were one play drives for TD. One 5 play drive td in first half and 7 play drive for td in second half. Returned two punts and one interception for TDs. Clock only stopped in second half for the change of quarter. 63 points on 10 offensive plays in the first half. That game got comical, I stopped watching after the 4th TD in the 1st quarter. Quote
Mr. Buddy Garrity Posted 31 minutes ago Report Posted 31 minutes ago That Canadian vs Muleshoe game was fun in the 1st half for one team 😂 I know you got bored @Matthew328 Quote
1970 Posted 17 minutes ago Report Posted 17 minutes ago 43 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said: Looking at scores from across the state but even just our coverage area, there were way too many blowouts in these first rounds. Of our 9 coverage area games last night, only one was competitive. (#3 seed Palestine Westwood beat #2 Anahuac 41-27). All the other games were complete blowouts. (well maybe not SA/UG as it was 33-7 but SA led the whole game and UG only scored with a minute left in game) 6 of the 9 games teams scored 60+. 4 scored 70+. The average margin of victory in the 9 games was 50 points. Take out the Anahuac/WW game and it's 54 points. Six of the nine games last night were #1 vs. #4. (technically the DP/NS game wasn't but NS is the #1 DI seed). All of those games were not competitive. Those scores: 62-14, 70-0, 70-0, 33-7, 75-14, 68-19. My point (and one that I have had all along) is the playoffs are too watered down. I never liked a 4th team being added to playoffs. Particularly when that 4th team comes from a district with just 4, 5, or 6 teams. I just don't think as a whole, you get a quality team going that far down in a district. Yes I know there are outliers. (have been some 4 seeds make it deep in playoffs) But the vast majority get their butt whipped (like last night) in the 1st round. Call me old school, but I liked it when it was just 2 teams. Rant over. I was thinking the same thing last night while looking at the scores. The top-4 teams making playoffs is too much. Maybe 3 is too many as well. I was trying to stream six man games last night, fortunately the effort was mostly unsuccessful, based on what I saw. Quote
BBfan061 Posted 17 minutes ago Report Posted 17 minutes ago 3 teams making playoffs seems fair enough and not watered down… only 2 teams IMO will hurt some better teams chances due to some districts being way stronger than others. Just my opinion… bullets13 and AggiesAreWe 2 Quote
AggiesAreWe Posted 16 minutes ago Author Report Posted 16 minutes ago Just now, BBfan061 said: 3 teams making playoffs seems fair enough and not watered down… only 2 teams IMO will hurt some better teams chances due to some districts being way stronger than others. Just my opinion… I'm ok with 3 teams. It gives the district champion a well deserved bye. BBfan061 1 Quote
1970 Posted 15 minutes ago Report Posted 15 minutes ago Hopefully we'll jinx Montgomery tonight with these rants. Quote
BBfan061 Posted 14 minutes ago Report Posted 14 minutes ago Just now, AggiesAreWe said: I'm ok with 3 teams. It gives the district champion a well deserved bye. Unfortunately I don’t see a world where they go back to that… Trust me I’m all for more football but I honestly didn’t even watch the second half of Bellville vs Worthing because the writing was on the wall… Quote
oldeagle Posted 4 minutes ago Report Posted 4 minutes ago A 24 team college playoff was just created. We are not going back. Quote
BBfan061 Posted 3 minutes ago Report Posted 3 minutes ago Just now, oldeagle said: A 24 team college playoff was just created. We are not going back. Thats terrible to Quote
Porter Posted 1 minute ago Report Posted 1 minute ago I believe only top 2 teams in each district should make the playoffs. 1st round scores last night were ridiculous. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.