Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Looking at scores from across the state but even just our coverage area, there were way too many blowouts in these first rounds. 

Of our 9 coverage area games last night, only one was competitive. (#3 seed Palestine Westwood beat #2 Anahuac 41-27).

All the other games were complete blowouts. (well maybe not SA/UG as it was 33-7 but SA led the whole game and UG only scored with a minute left in game)

6 of the 9 games teams scored 60+. 4 scored 70+. The average margin of victory in the 9 games was 50 points. Take out the Anahuac/WW game and it's 54 points.

Six of the nine games last night were #1 vs. #4. (technically the DP/NS game wasn't but NS is the #1 DI seed). All of those games were not competitive. Those scores: 62-14, 70-0, 70-0, 33-7, 75-14, 68-19. 

My point (and one that I have had all along) is the playoffs are too watered down. I never liked a 4th team being added to playoffs. Particularly when that 4th team comes from a district with just 4, 5, or 6 teams. I just don't think as a whole, you get a quality team going that far down in a district. 

Yes I know there are outliers. (have been some 4 seeds make it deep in playoffs) But the vast majority get their butt whipped (like last night) in the 1st round.

Call me old school, but I liked it when it was just 2 teams.

Rant over.

Posted

I was just thinking the same thing.  Brock won 77 - 7.  This was not a run up the score game.  Brock had 8 possessions on offense. 6 of the 8 were one play drives for TD. One 5 play drive td  in first half and 7 play drive for td in second half.  Returned two punts and one interception for TDs. Clock only stopped in second half for the change of quarter. 63 points on 10 offensive plays in the first half.  

Posted
1 minute ago, AHUDDLESTON said:

I was just thinking the same thing.  Brock won 77 - 7.  This was not a run up the score game.  Brock had 8 possessions on offense. 6 of the 8 were one play drives for TD. One 5 play drive td  in first half and 7 play drive for td in second half.  Returned two punts and one interception for TDs. Clock only stopped in second half for the change of quarter. 63 points on 10 offensive plays in the first half.  

That game got comical, I stopped watching after the 4th TD in the 1st quarter. 

Posted
43 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Looking at scores from across the state but even just our coverage area, there were way too many blowouts in these first rounds. 

Of our 9 coverage area games last night, only one was competitive. (#3 seed Palestine Westwood beat #2 Anahuac 41-27).

All the other games were complete blowouts. (well maybe not SA/UG as it was 33-7 but SA led the whole game and UG only scored with a minute left in game)

6 of the 9 games teams scored 60+. 4 scored 70+. The average margin of victory in the 9 games was 50 points. Take out the Anahuac/WW game and it's 54 points.

Six of the nine games last night were #1 vs. #4. (technically the DP/NS game wasn't but NS is the #1 DI seed). All of those games were not competitive. Those scores: 62-14, 70-0, 70-0, 33-7, 75-14, 68-19. 

My point (and one that I have had all along) is the playoffs are too watered down. I never liked a 4th team being added to playoffs. Particularly when that 4th team comes from a district with just 4, 5, or 6 teams. I just don't think as a whole, you get a quality team going that far down in a district. 

Yes I know there are outliers. (have been some 4 seeds make it deep in playoffs) But the vast majority get their butt whipped (like last night) in the 1st round.

Call me old school, but I liked it when it was just 2 teams.

Rant over.

I was thinking the same thing last night while looking at the scores.  The top-4 teams making playoffs is too much.  Maybe 3 is too many as well.  I was trying to stream six man games last night, fortunately the effort was mostly unsuccessful, based on what I saw.  

Posted
Just now, BBfan061 said:

3 teams making playoffs seems fair enough and not watered down… only 2 teams IMO will hurt some better teams chances due to some districts being way stronger than others. Just my opinion… 

I'm ok with 3 teams. It gives the district champion a well deserved bye.

Posted
Just now, AggiesAreWe said:

I'm ok with 3 teams. It gives the district champion a well deserved bye.

Unfortunately I don’t see a world where they go back to that… Trust me I’m all for more football but I honestly didn’t even watch the second half of Bellville vs Worthing because the writing was on the wall…

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    47,050
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Helen Wheels
    Newest Member
    Helen Wheels
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...