UT alum Posted yesterday at 05:42 AM Report Posted yesterday at 05:42 AM You know, I like to play a little blackjack from time to time. I’ve studied the game a bit and done my share of observation at the table. There is a limited number of hands that are advantageous to the player on a double down bet. I’ve seen people make it a little ways doubling down on losing hands. I’ve never seen one leave the table a winner. No wonder Trump bankrupted a casino. The Miller double down might leave the whole Republican Party walking away from the table bankrupt. AggiesAreWe and DCT 2 Quote
thetragichippy Posted yesterday at 02:50 PM Report Posted yesterday at 02:50 PM A bold move, I would of made him Press Secretary - lol Trump did him a solid by appointing to chief of staff. He can continue with whatever agenda he wants and Stephen will not have to go before congress if subpoenaed. Quote
UT alum Posted 22 hours ago Author Report Posted 22 hours ago 3 hours ago, thetragichippy said: A bold move, I would of made him Press Secretary - lol Trump did him a solid by appointing to chief of staff. He can continue with whatever agenda he wants and Stephen will not have to go before congress if subpoenaed. You’re looking the wrong way, pal. This was a change election. The people want to see legislative action. One of the Chief of Staff’s primary duties is to coordinate the White House’s legislative agenda to Congress. Stephen Miller will prove incapable of operating in that capacity, driving the Republican Party deeper into the hole. Press Secretary would have been a much ch safer move. Quote
thetragichippy Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago 5 hours ago, UT alum said: You’re looking the wrong way, pal. This was a change election. The people want to see legislative action. One of the Chief of Staff’s primary duties is to coordinate the White House’s legislative agenda to Congress. Stephen Miller will prove incapable of operating in that capacity, driving the Republican Party deeper into the hole. Press Secretary would have been a much ch safer move. Legislative action like impeaching Hegseth that failed today? Quote
DCT Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago 22 minutes ago, thetragichippy said: Legislative action like impeaching Hegseth that failed today? January is approaching fast. That is when change begins not anytime sooner. Today was just dress rehearsal. Quote
thetragichippy Posted 16 hours ago Report Posted 16 hours ago 48 minutes ago, DCT said: January is approaching fast. That is when change begins not anytime sooner. Today was just dress rehearsal. You are correct. A dress rehearsal that they are not going to pass any legislation that brings prices down, they are going to try and remove Hegseth and Trump instead of waiting for the next election to Democratically remove them. I can’t wait, this will help Republicans. Quote
ZacharySmith Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago 2 hours ago, thetragichippy said: Legislative action like impeaching Hegseth that failed today? Alan Dershowitz: "So by the standards that this guy, Thomas Massie, has espoused, he should be impeached because he is violating the Constitution." "He's saying that Hegseth should be impeached for violating the Constitution, but he's calling for impeachment on grounds that were explicitly rejected by the framers of the Constitution." thetragichippy 1 Quote
UT alum Posted 13 hours ago Author Report Posted 13 hours ago 3 hours ago, thetragichippy said: Legislative action like impeaching Hegseth that failed today? No. $13.50 minimum wage. Big income tax increase on incomes over $500,000. Restore MEDICAID and SNAP benefits gutted by the bbb. Forbid sitting members of Congress trading stocks. You know, stuff that got Republicans whacked in this election. Simplest playbook I’ve seen yet. We’ll get Hegseth in January. And Blanche. And RFK Jr. Don’t need to get Trump. He’s done. Quote
UT alum Posted 13 hours ago Author Report Posted 13 hours ago 1 hour ago, ZacharySmith said: Alan Dershowitz: "So by the standards that this guy, Thomas Massie, has espoused, he should be impeached because he is violating the Constitution." "He's saying that Hegseth should be impeached for violating the Constitution, but he's calling for impeachment on grounds that were explicitly rejected by the framers of the Constitution." Alan Dershowitz? Are you serious? There is no bigger shill for the Republican Party. Quote
UT alum Posted 13 hours ago Author Report Posted 13 hours ago 2 hours ago, thetragichippy said: You are correct. A dress rehearsal that they are not going to pass any legislation that brings prices down, they are going to try and remove Hegseth and Trump instead of waiting for the next election to Democratically remove them. I can’t wait, this will help Republicans. What are you talking about? Hegseth is not elected. Trump cannot be re-elected. Hegseth will be removed come January through Constitutionally granted powers, i.e. democratically. Quote
baddog Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 42 minutes ago, UT alum said: No. $13.50 minimum wage. Big income tax increase on incomes over $500,000. Restore MEDICAID and SNAP benefits gutted by the bbb. Forbid sitting members of Congress trading stocks. You know, stuff that got Republicans whacked in this election. Simplest playbook I’ve seen yet. We’ll get Hegseth in January. And Blanche. And RFK Jr. Don’t need to get Trump. He’s done. Quote
UT alum Posted 12 hours ago Author Report Posted 12 hours ago 40 minutes ago, baddog said: Reaganomics is dead. It died November 2, 2026. Quote
UT alum Posted 12 hours ago Author Report Posted 12 hours ago 4 minutes ago, UT alum said: Reaganomics is dead. It died November 2, 2026. November 3, 2026. Quote
UT alum Posted 12 hours ago Author Report Posted 12 hours ago 56 minutes ago, baddog said: This is why it died. The vote on the 3rd was as much anti-billionaire as anything. This wasn’t a Trump mandate. It was a true mandate. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
Porter Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 6 hours ago, UT alum said: This is why it died. The vote on the 3rd was as much anti-billionaire as anything. This wasn’t a Trump mandate. It was a true mandate. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Guess you totally forgot about the plandemic (Covid) where the largest transfer of wealth in history occurred. Remember 4 shots because the first one worked so good. Smh Quote
baddog Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 8 hours ago, UT alum said: This is why it died. The vote on the 3rd was as much anti-billionaire as anything. This wasn’t a Trump mandate. It was a true mandate. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up All part of the communist manifesto. Make the middle class poor and rob the wealth. What part of that are you unable to see? Quote
UT alum Posted 2 hours ago Author Report Posted 2 hours ago 2 hours ago, Porter said: Guess you totally forgot about the plandemic (Covid) where the largest transfer of wealth in history occurred. Remember 4 shots because the first one worked so good. Smh That’s old, fake news, bud. Quote
UT alum Posted 2 hours ago Author Report Posted 2 hours ago 55 minutes ago, baddog said: All part of the communist manifesto. Make the middle class poor and rob the wealth. What part of that are you unable to see? That is the heart of Reaganomics. Rob from the poor, give to the rich. Could you not interpret the graph? Quote
Porter Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 8 minutes ago, UT alum said: That’s old, fake news, bud. Nothing fake about it, do your research BUD. Quote
Porter Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 13 minutes ago, UT alum said: That’s old, fake news, bud. Per Google Bud Yes, many economists, policymakers, and analysts describe the economic policies and market shifts during the COVID-19 pandemic as one of the largest and fastest concentrations or transfers of wealth in modern U.S. history. Quote
thetragichippy Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 11 hours ago, UT alum said: What are you talking about? Hegseth is not elected. Trump cannot be re-elected. Hegseth will be removed come January through Constitutionally granted powers, i.e. democratically. I thought I was pretty clear, in January they will try to impeach Hegseth again, and it will fail in the Senate. Then they will try to impeach Trump if that fails. what they should do is let both of them play out their two years, and hope they get the presidency…. but they won’t, which gives Republicans a much better chance in 2028. Quote
thetragichippy Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 11 hours ago, UT alum said: What are you talking about? Hegseth is not elected. Trump cannot be re-elected. Hegseth will be removed come January through Constitutionally granted powers, i.e. democratically. Pelosi knew it was a bad idea, which is why she didn’t vote. You think they would learn after two impeachments that failed….. Quote
OlDawg Posted 43 minutes ago Report Posted 43 minutes ago 13 hours ago, UT alum said: No. $13.50 minimum wage. Big income tax increase on incomes over $500,000. Restore MEDICAID and SNAP benefits gutted by the bbb. Forbid sitting members of Congress trading stocks. You know, stuff that got Republicans whacked in this election. Simplest playbook I’ve seen yet. We’ll get Hegseth in January. And Blanche. And RFK Jr. Don’t need to get Trump. He’s done. The big tax increase you speak of would be a disaster. It would wipe out small business in America. Innovation would be decimated. We would become Europe at best. Maybe that’s what some want. Foolish people. Over 60% of small businesses are sole proprietors and file personal. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up thetragichippy 1 Quote
5GallonBucket Posted 14 minutes ago Report Posted 14 minutes ago Yall wasting yall s time. to many examples of failures(not just in the states) for all to see(liberals included) today and thru out history some people just refuse….so dust your feet off. our focus needs to be the youth. Teach personal responsibility, work ethic no matter the job, fortitude: stand tall and true thru persecution, respect the law, Christian modeling: men for boys and Women for girls, truth and facts, fishing, hunting, gardening, preserving, difference between helping and handicapping, be independent not dependent….etc etc and all this would come if more people would read the Holy Word for themselves. im so off topic…😁 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.