navydawg31 Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago Great win dogs! 2-0 in district play keep it going Reagan 1 Quote
DoggStyle Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago Good wins against two not-so-great teams. So, what kind of strategy is it to leave all your starters in until you're up by 40+ POINTS before mixing in 2nd/3rd stringers? That's a recipe to get a starter hurt, especially when you're in the running for playoffs. You leave your star RBs and starting defensive players in? Is Nederland trying to make a statement or something? All the crowd praises the coach when winning, but if a starter got hurt unnecessarily I'm pretty sure they'd turn. Just idiotic if you ask me. There's plenty of 2nd/rd stringers who could've still done well against that team. Quote
AggiesAreWe Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, DoggStyle said: Good wins against two not-so-great teams. So, what kind of strategy is it to leave all your starters in until you're up by 40+ POINTS before mixing in 2nd/3rd stringers? That's a recipe to get a starter hurt, especially when you're in the running for playoffs. You leave your star RBs and starting defensive players in? Is Nederland trying to make a statement or something? All the crowd praises the coach when winning, but if a starter got hurt unnecessarily I'm pretty sure they'd turn. Just idiotic if you ask me. There's plenty of 2nd/rd stringers who could've still done well against that team. Are you spidersal offspring? Quote
DoggStyle Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 3 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said: Are you spidersal offspring? Wth is spidersal? Quote
AggiesAreWe Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago Just now, DoggStyle said: Wth is spidersal? He's our resident site pessimist. Do a member search here and read his posts and you will understand. Quote
DoggStyle Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago Just now, AggiesAreWe said: He's our resident site pessimist. Do a member search here and read his posts and you will understand. So asking a legit question about coaching tactics is a pessimist? Quote
AggiesAreWe Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, DoggStyle said: So asking a legit question about coaching tactics is a pessimist? Not necessarily. You just have to know about this particular members posts and you will see what I am talking about. Quote
1970 Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 18 minutes ago, DoggStyle said: Good wins against two not-so-great teams. So, what kind of strategy is it to leave all your starters in until you're up by 40+ POINTS before mixing in 2nd/3rd stringers? That's a recipe to get a starter hurt, especially when you're in the running for playoffs. You leave your star RBs and starting defensive players in? Is Nederland trying to make a statement or something? All the crowd praises the coach when winning, but if a starter got hurt unnecessarily I'm pretty sure they'd turn. Just idiotic if you ask me. There's plenty of 2nd/rd stringers who could've still done well against that team. I didn't watch the game. We're starters playing in the 3rd or 4th qtrs? Just for comparison, for the past several years anyway, in runaway games, C.Joseph left starters in the first half regardless of score. But 2nd half most if not all starters sit out, and the bench gets emptied. If the opposition makes too big of a comeback, or perhaps on a critical play, a few appropriate starters may get back on the field. NDNWarrior 1 Quote
DoggStyle Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 7 minutes ago, 1970 said: I didn't watch the game. We're starters playing in the 3rd or 4th qtrs? Just for comparison, for the past several years anyway, in runaway games, C.Joseph left starters in the first half regardless of score. But 2nd half most if not all starters sit out, and the bench gets emptied. If the opposition makes too big of a comeback, or perhaps on a critical play, a few appropriate starters may get back on the field. Starters pretty much stayed in until mid 4th qtr, up by like 40 points. Quote
Bigdog Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago Neumann kept starters in until 1st series of 3rd qtr in blowouts. I guess the coach felt they had something that needed working on. Tougher games are coming up. Reagan 1 Quote
Darth Texas Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago I don’t necessarily want my starters sitting for half of three games in a row before starting a stretch against png, Texas city, and Dayton. Nederland might go as well as 3-0 in that stretch, but just as easily goes 0-3. Can’t afford a slow start just because the last couple weeks were blowouts. Quote
DoggStyle Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 40 minutes ago, Darth Texas said: I don’t necessarily want my starters sitting for half of three games in a row before starting a stretch against png, Texas city, and Dayton. Nederland might go as well as 3-0 in that stretch, but just as easily goes 0-3. Can’t afford a slow start just because the last couple weeks were blowouts. True. Could go either way. Nederland kids are pretty prone to injuries these days, so I personally would take more caution. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.