thetragichippy Posted Friday at 01:46 PM Report Posted Friday at 01:46 PM I doubt there is anything that can be done - but for him to say he knew it was political but didn't understand the meaning or possible meaning is ridiculous....OR proves he was a horrible FBI director.... This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
baddog Posted Friday at 02:28 PM Report Posted Friday at 02:28 PM 37 minutes ago, thetragichippy said: I doubt there is anything that can be done - but for him to say he knew it was political but didn't understand the meaning or possible meaning is ridiculous....OR proves he was a horrible FBI director.... This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Yeah, he didn’t know what those numbers meant. He was just casually walking down the beach and saw these shells arranged in this pattern, thought they were so beautifully arranged, snapped a pic, and posted it on the internet. He’s well known for posting nature scenes. Give me a break. Does anyone really believe him? If he didn’t know they were bad, why did he take them down? Comey is a criminal and should already be in jail for lying to congress. Quote
baddog Posted Friday at 11:49 PM Report Posted Friday at 11:49 PM House resolution This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
Reagan Posted Saturday at 04:44 PM Report Posted Saturday at 04:44 PM From the article: "A formal letter has just been sent to Secret Service Director Sean Curran and FBI Director Kash Patel, calling for an immediate joint investigation into James Comey after he posted a disturbing message on social media using the phrase “86” in reference to President Trump. That term is widely understood to mean kill or eliminate. The letter demands a full probe into potential violations of federal law, including 18 U.S.C. § 871 (threats against the President) and 18 U.S.C. § 875 (interstate threats). It also presses for answers on whether Comey still holds a security clearance or has access to classified material. The same Left that spent years crying about “stochastic terrorism” is silent now. But silence isn’t justice. If Comey broke the law, he doesn’t get to hide behind his badge or his politics—he belongs in handcuffs." No one is above the law!! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
tvc184 Posted Saturday at 08:52 PM Report Posted Saturday at 08:52 PM I think that it’s all nonsense but in this supercharged political climate, I wouldn’t doubt anything. Quote
CardinalBacker Posted Sunday at 02:02 AM Report Posted Sunday at 02:02 AM 5 hours ago, tvc184 said: I think that it’s all nonsense but in this supercharged political climate, I wouldn’t doubt anything. It’s laughable that the same people who pardoned the J6 rioters for violent actions at the Capitol are now calling this a threat. It would be a funny if they weren’t serious. I dont see how Americans don’t end up at war between the right and left. There just aren’t that many more ways to escalate the attacks without lives being lost. Quote
baddog Posted Sunday at 10:48 AM Report Posted Sunday at 10:48 AM Did the 1/6 protesters get due process? Of course not, but criminal illegal invaders should. Everything depends on which battle you want to pick. Quote
SmashMouth Posted 22 hours ago Report Posted 22 hours ago If I'm being honest, I think it's trivial at best. To me, the term to "86" something or someone means simply to get rid of or replace it - not necessarily through death or violence. I can't stand Comey, but this is a ridiculous non-event that shouldn't be wasting valuable time or resources. Move on, nothing to see here... tvc184 1 Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted 22 hours ago Report Posted 22 hours ago 3 minutes ago, SmashMouth said: If I'm being honest, I think it's trivial at best. To me, the term to "86" something or someone means simply to get rid of or replace it - not necessarily through death or violence. I can't stand Comey, but this is a ridiculous non-event that shouldn't be wasting valuable time or resources. Move on, nothing to see here... Agree, the main takeaway here is more proof that Comey is a partisan hack that was unfit for the job. SmashMouth and baddog 2 Quote
SmashMouth Posted 22 hours ago Report Posted 22 hours ago 23 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said: Agree, the main takeaway here is more proof that Comey is a partisan hack that was unfit for the job. Agreed Quote
baddog Posted 21 hours ago Report Posted 21 hours ago 47 minutes ago, SmashMouth said: If I'm being honest, I think it's trivial at best. To me, the term to "86" something or someone means simply to get rid of or replace it - not necessarily through death or violence. I can't stand Comey, but this is a ridiculous non-event that shouldn't be wasting valuable time or resources. Move on, nothing to see here... I can see the absurdity of it all, especially the part about Comey being a nature photographer, which there is no shame in that, except that these shells weren’t really photogenic, in my humble opinion, so why post them to the internet and delete? SmashMouth 1 Quote
tvc184 Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago 15 hours ago, SmashMouth said: If I'm being honest, I think it's trivial at best. To me, the term to "86" something or someone means simply to get rid of or replace it - not necessarily through death or violence. I can't stand Comey, but this is a ridiculous non-event that shouldn't be wasting valuable time or resources. Move on, nothing to see here... Yep, that’s why I said it was all nonsense. Of course he could get the Martha Stewart prosecution. Stewart was accused of insider trading and they couldn’t prove it but she stupidly did not remain silent and lied to the FBI. So she is now a convicted felon for obstruction of justice or whatever they call it. thetragichippy and SmashMouth 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.