Breaking News - TRUMP to release EPSTEIN files and client list!

[TheMissingBand]

2 minutes ago, UT alum said:

I’m with you. I’ve raised hell with him about his support for the “party of austerity” for years. The really rich folks know they’ll get to keep theirs (even if they have to convert to gold) and don’t really care about anyone else’s financial ruin.

It blows my mind how they get poor/middle class people to vote in rich peoples’ best interest.  “We’re going to give tax breaks to the rich… they’ll spend more money, and you will probably make more money.”

 

It’s like the people in Texas wanting to abolish property taxes. My dad is 77 and pays $800/ year.  A 7% consumption tax on all of the goods and services that he purchases annually will cost him roughly $2500 year… a net increase of $1700/year-and he’s all for it. And if he has a crash like most old people and needs to replace his $50k truck? That’s another $3500 he’d have to pay that year. And he’s like “BRING IT ON!!!”

[baddog]

14 minutes ago, Porter said:

I was being facetious myself but the Epstein Child Sex Trafficking is not a joke or a hoax imo.

Well of course not. What a spin. The joke is there are people waiting for a Rolodex of names and there isn’t one, kinda like the list.

[baddog]

Joy Behar, defending co-host Whoopi Goldberg’s name appearing in the Epstein files said, “Anybody can be on the list”. Funny how that works.

[TheMissingBand]

2 hours ago, baddog said:

Well of course not. What a spin. The joke is there are people waiting for a Rolodex of names and there isn’t one, kinda like the list.

There are tons and tons of half truths and whole lies. On one hand you have people looking at the worst accusations as gospel, and the other half dismissing everything in the files as rubbish when some of it is undoubtedly true. And both sides are wrong for their points of view. 
 

I have no doubt that Trump was involved in the nastiness. I mean, what should you expect from a guy that cheated on his nude model wife with a hardcore pornstar? But since MAGA didn’t hold him to a moral standard then, they won’t hold him to a moral standard if is proven that he sexually assaulted a minor. Y’all preemptively forgave him for sexually assaulting grown women… it’s not that big of a stretch to forgive him for sexually assaulting a slightly younger one.  I mean… maybe he didn’t know she was underage when he grabbed her by the ……. 

[baddog]

Yes, and people who watch porn shouldn’t lecture on having a moral compass. When Trump enters the Oval Office, he still has it sprayed with 409 cleaner. The “grab ‘em” comment is old.

Lots of names have been released. Some have resigned (even a woman) with no charges. No one has mentioned anyone else but Trump. Please correct me if I’m wrong. If so, I haven’t seen the post. This is nothing more than another witch hunt to get Trump. Look at Clinton’s record of sexual encounters, especially Bobbie Ann Williams, a prostitute. As soon as you denounce Clinton because of past activities, then you can spout off to the Trump fans. In either case, everything is circumstantial no matter how hard you keep emphasizing. 

[UT alum]

11 hours ago, TheMissingBand said:

Steadily promising DOGE checks, Tariff checks, and no income tax on anything we can think of (that will get a vote). 

Borrowing $43.5 billion  a week since start of the fiscal year. Trump hallmark. Borrow the money, ditch the bill. Don’t need no stinking taxes. Just keep printing money. 

[LumRaiderFan]

16 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Borrowing $43.5 billion  a week since start of the fiscal year. Trump hallmark. Borrow the money, ditch the bill. Don’t need no stinking taxes. Just keep printing money. 

With Biden being right there with him.  But I never once saw you complain about his spending.  Some folks know it’s both sides, you do not.

Also, Trump had to spend a lot of money fixing problems biden ignored, like the border.

[TheMissingBand]

1 hour ago, baddog said:

Yes, and people who watch porn shouldn’t lecture on having a moral compass. When Trump enters the Oval Office, he still has it sprayed with 409 cleaner. The “grab ‘em” comment is old.

Lots of names have been released. Some have resigned (even a woman) with no charges. No one has mentioned anyone else but Trump. Please correct me if I’m wrong. If so, I haven’t seen the post. This is nothing more than another witch hunt to get Trump. Look at Clinton’s record of sexual encounters, especially Bobbie Ann Williams, a prostitute. As soon as you denounce Clinton because of past activities, then you can spout off to the Trump fans. In either case, everything is circumstantial no matter how hard you keep emphasizing. 

Clinton got with an intern in the Oval Office, then lied about it to Congress-for which he was impeached. I denounce Clinton’s immoral and unethical behavior. But I don’t remember Dems re-electing Bill Clinton after he was impeached, unlike when the Rs re-elected Trump after being impeached TWICE.  Dems are obviously more moral.  

So now I have your permission to spout off to the Trump fans, right?

[LumRaiderFan]

8 minutes ago, TheMissingBand said:

Clinton got with an intern in the Oval Office, then lied about it to Congress-for which he was impeached. I denounce Clinton’s immoral and unethical behavior. But I don’t remember Dems re-electing Bill Clinton after he was impeached, unlike when the Rs re-elected Trump after being impeached TWICE.  Dems are obviously more moral.  

So now I have your permission to spout off to the Trump fans, right?

lol, the reason you don’t remember them re-electing is because they couldn’t, but democrats would have elected him for another term if possible.

Clinton was impeached for lying to a grand jury (which he did), the impeachments of Trump were bogus charges.  Like the guy or not, anyone with a little sense knows the charges were nonsense.

And I recall you speaking highly of Clinton in past posts.

[baddog]

9 minutes ago, TheMissingBand said:

Clinton got with an intern in the Oval Office, then lied about it to Congress-for which he was impeached. I denounce Clinton’s immoral and unethical behavior. But I don’t remember Dems re-electing Bill Clinton after he was impeached, unlike when the Rs re-elected Trump after being impeached TWICE.  Dems are obviously more moral.  

So now I have your permission to spout off to the Trump fans, right?

No.

[TheMissingBand]

24 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

lol, the reason you don’t remember them re-electing is because they couldn’t, but democrats would have elected him for another term if possible.

Clinton was impeached for lying to a grand jury (which he did), the impeachments of Trump were bogus charges.  Like the guy or not, anyone with a little sense knows the charges were nonsense.

And I recall you speaking highly of Clinton in past posts.

Not me… I’m fairly certain that I’ve never mentioned President Clinton in any of my posts. 
 

But you do realize that Rs were HORRIFIED at Bill having consensual relations with “that woman, Ms Lewinsk, but don’t mind the fact that Trump definitely sexually assaulted women (in his own bragging words to a reporter), as well as proven to have done the same to E Jean Kelly to a jury of his peers.  The man is a serial assaulter of women, and philanderer, and quite possibly a pedophile, “but, but, but…. Clinton had an affair!”

 

And for what it’s worth, that second impeachmet was legit. He not only should have been kept off of the ballot in ‘24, he should be sitting in Epstein’s old cell. The good news is that the be DOJ will be able to pick up right where they left off when he leaves office, assuming he’s not senile. 
 

Please, please, get out and vote Paxton for Senator between now and March 3rd. It’s the reason that Trump’s FCC is trying to keep Talarico off of late night TV, if you haven’t been watching that story. 
 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[Reagan]

41 minutes ago, TheMissingBand said:

Clinton got with an intern in the Oval Office, then lied about it to Congress-for which he was impeached. I denounce Clinton’s immoral and unethical behavior. But I don’t remember Dems re-electing Bill Clinton after he was impeached, unlike when the Rs re-elected Trump after being impeached TWICE.  Dems are obviously more moral.  

So now I have your permission to spout off to the Trump fans, right?

Again — what was he impeached for??