Jump to content

Baytown Lee (21) @ Crosby (41) - FINAL


jdawg03

Recommended Posts

Game Info:


Start: Friday, September 9, 2022 at 7:00:00 PM
Home Team Name/Class/District/Division: Crosby - 5A-8-1
Record: District Wins: 0, Overall Wins: 0, District Losses: 0, Overall Losses: 1

Visiting Team Name/Class/District/Division: Baytown Lee- 5A-8-1
Record: District Wins: 0, Overall Wins: 0, District Losses: 0, Overall Losses: 1

District Matchup: Yes

*Standings do not include this game.

 

INSTRUCTIONS TO LIVE UPDATE THIS GAME ON THE SCOREBOARD: 
Type !!score:Visitor's Score/Home Score/Quarter/Minutes Left/Seconds Left
or !!final:Visitor's Score/Home Score


Example: !!score:10/14/4/6/10 would be 10 to 14 in the 4th quarter with 6:10 left. 
or !!final:10/14 would be 10 to 14 as the final score. 

You may also use - , or | in place of /

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crosby only has three plays. Luckily they work a bit due to their athleticism. Throw right laterally, throw left laterally and chuck it up for grabs down field. Lee has completely shut down any running game.

One of the chucks went for a TD after the defender missed the sure INT.

Lee is one missed 4th down conversion on 4th and short deep in Crosby's territory away from being up at the half.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, panamamyers said:

Crosby only has three plays. Luckily they work a bit due to their athleticism. Throw right laterally, throw left laterally and chuck it up for grabs down field. Lee has completely shut down any running game.

One of the chucks went for a TD after the defender missed the sure INT.

Lee is one missed 4th down conversion on 4th and short deep in Crosby's territory away from being up at the half.

All of that and you neglected to say Crosby fumbled a punt and another offensive snap for turnovers to give Lee short field for touchdowns. SMH. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

3 minutes ago, CCRed said:

All of that and you neglected to say Crosby fumbled a punt and another offensive snap for turnovers to give Lee short field for touchdowns. SMH. 

Lee has no business being in this game. They have a much better coach that has been able to keep things close.

We will see how it goes in the second half.

I expect Crosby to come out and be a lot fresher and impose their will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, panamamyers said:

Crosby 20-7 towards end of 1st quarter. 

Crosby is big and has good athletes for this level but not very well coached.

Imagine saying the team that's been the State Championship and State Semifinals the last two years is not well coached. The shear amount of cognitive dissonance needed to derive that opinion is stunning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
    • Classic Bridge City.  Always someone else's fault, refs/umpires cheated, AD with an agenda, yada, yada, yada.  As far as I can tell it's damn near impossible to get fired at these schools so when someone does get fired, it's usually something.  Drama at Bridge City is a constant.  The guy did a good job coaching basketball and I'm sure he'll continue that somewhere else.  Time to move on.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...