Jump to content

Hudson 4 Huffman 0 Final In Game 1

BigRed88
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest etbu

Guest etbu

Posted
Posted

This Belt kid is a very good pitcher and hitter. However with that said with once Bagley stated throwing change ups and curves no more hits hardly. You cannot have four errors and five past balls and beat a team like Hudson. Two of the runs were earned but Hudson beat us fair and square and we will give it a try tomorrow. Listi is a very good pitcher and we have to cut down on the errors.

After thinking about it after the leadoff hitter started the game with a double I thought oh man this is not good. We gave up four runs in the first and after that nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MIF04

MIF04

Posted
Posted

Hudson gave up 13 runs to HJ in game 2 (just scored 18 to beat 'em). With Listi pitching, I don't think Hudson scores 18 so I look for this series to go to 3 games. At that point, it'll be a toss up and probably a high scoring game. Good luck Huffman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest etbu

Guest etbu

Posted
Posted

Hudson gave up 13 runs to HJ in game 2 (just scored 18 to beat 'em). With Listi pitching' date=' I don't think Hudson scores 18 so I look for this series to go to 3 games. At that point, it'll be a toss up and probably a high scoring game. Good luck Huffman.[/quote']

Bro I hope you are right and there is a third game. I look for both he Bc vs Bh and our games to put up some serious runs tomorrow. Do you think that Hudson will bring Belt back after pitching seven innings tonight?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
perfectshot

perfectshot

Posted
Posted

Huffman in driver's seat still. Hudson does not have the pitching to withstand 2 games. Listi throws game 2....which of course, we have to win to get to game 3.

Game 3: Arnold for Huffman. Bagley only threw 60 pitches. He can relieve.

Belt threw 116 pitches. No matter how much ice they packed on his arm; he will not be as strong coming back today in game 3.

If we make Belt throw strikes last night....he walks a ton of kids. He threw very well....no question. But our selection on pitches to swing at was horrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MIF04

MIF04

Posted
Posted

Close call on them bringing back Belt but I am sure they will (they have to for some period of the game). On the other hand, that kid is probably a round 2 draft choice (if he doesn't go to UT first) and that L arm is awful valuable. I just don't know what the situation is with him and his coaches. Fingers crossed for 2 games tomorrow for Huffman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest etbu

Guest etbu

Posted
Posted

http://www.lufkindailynews.com/sports/content/sports/stories/2006/05/18/5/hudson_hh_game_1.html

Leaving ten runners on base is never good. I hear this morning that they were putting ice Mr. Belt's arm and may throw him in game three. WOW If I was his father I may have something to say about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • 72 Pinto
      Bridge City is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • bullets13
      Bridge City is open

      By bullets13 · Posted

      I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • Eagles12
      Bridge City is open

      By Eagles12 · Posted

      He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • 72 Pinto
      LC-M is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
    • 72 Pinto
      Bridge City is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      Classic Bridge City.  Always someone else's fault, refs/umpires cheated, AD with an agenda, yada, yada, yada.  As far as I can tell it's damn near impossible to get fired at these schools so when someone does get fired, it's usually something.  Drama at Bridge City is a constant.  The guy did a good job coaching basketball and I'm sure he'll continue that somewhere else.  Time to move on.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...