Supreme Court Paxon Lawsuit

[Big girl]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[BLUEDOVE3]

Big girl, I'm somewhat confused at this time. Why haven't you had any rebuttals from your thread?

[Big girl]

24 minutes ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

Big girl, I'm somewhat confused at this time. Why haven't you had any rebuttals from your thread?

Lol. Because, it is true

[Realville]

When they refuse to listen to the evidence - the fix is in. 

[Realville]

They refuse to hear the case with 18 states backing Texas , that doesn’t mean there wasn’t evidence of fraud. Some of the cowardly justices probably didn’t want their families threatened and canceled like the Democrat Left has done when you don’t agree with them. What a thieving embarrassing election this is becoming. 

[Reagan]

3 hours ago, Big girl said:

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

I trust these conservative justices.  We know there was massive fraud.  They were not going to debate this aspect of it anyway.  Apparently they are saying this is not the way that this needs to be resolved.  I think everybody knew it was a long shot.   Again --  the fraud is still there!

[Reagan]

2 hours ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

Big girl, I'm somewhat confused at this time. Why haven't you had any rebuttals from your thread?

Why no comment from you or BigGirl about this video?!

 

[Realville]

5 minutes ago, Reagan said:

I trust these conservative justices.  We know there was massive fraud.  They were not going to debate this aspect of it anyway.  Apparently they are saying this is not the way that this needs to be resolved.  I think everybody knew it was a long shot.   Again --  the fraud is still there!

Texas’s case wasn’t about fraud but the fact the swing states did not follow their own voting laws put forth in the US Constitution which allowed the fraud which in turn diluted Texas’s electoral votes.

[Reagan]

1 hour ago, Realville said:

Texas’s case wasn’t about fraud but the fact the swing states did not follow their own voting laws put forth in the US Constitution which allowed the fraud which in turn diluted Texas’s electoral votes.

Realville, my friend, don't fret.  The Justices didn't decide on ANY of the 4 state's illegal activities.  Nothing concerning the fraud or the obvious Constitutional violations.  What they said was:  Texas does not have the standing/authority to be concerned about what another state do with their elections.  That's it!  There is no doubt in my mind that law suits that are out there concerning the fraud that we are concerned about will end up before the Supreme Court.  And I'm sure the Justices realize this.  And I feel strongly that when presented with all the fraud evidence that they will rule in Trump's favor.  

As for as the Constitutional violations of the 4 states, once all this has been settled, the GOP within these states are going to have to file the law suits that could eventually be brought before the Supreme Court.  Keep the faith.  The devils will not prevail!

[Big girl]

15 hours ago, Realville said:

They refuse to hear the case with 18 states backing Texas , that doesn’t mean there wasn’t evidence of fraud. Some of the cowardly justices probably didn’t want their families threatened and canceled like the Democrat Left has done when you don’t agree with them. What a thieving embarrassing election this is becoming. 

It's over. The fat lady sang. Lol

[Realville]

Trump was right.

Democrats used the pandemic for their mail-in voting scam. Anyone who can't see this is blinded by their ideology, or an utter fool.
 

Try watching some the eyewitness testimony of people under oath at the hearings in front of the swing state State Legislatures that the National Media covered up. The outright fraud and bullying was ridiculous. Wether your Democrat or Republican it would  piss you off after hearing the eyewitness testimonies at these hearings unless your feelings are always hurt by Trump. 

[Realville]

The Constitution is 4 pages.

We’re furious because Originalists treated a simple matter of federalism as a contentious, even unanswerable, question of “standing.”

No state would have joined the union knowing the other 49 can violate the Electors Clause. Or any clause. The end.

[baddog]

5 hours ago, Big girl said:

It's over. The fat lady sang. Lol

The only fat lady you hear singing is YOU in the shower.

[BS Wildcats]

6 hours ago, Big girl said:

It's over. The fat lady sang. Lol

Can you carry a tune?

[Realville]

These coward judges are dismissing these lawsuits based on standing b/c they know once the evidence is presented they’ll have no choice but to throw out fraudulent votes

[SmashMouth]

46 minutes ago, Realville said:

These coward judges are dismissing these lawsuits based on standing b/c they know once the evidence is presented they’ll have no choice but to throw out fraudulent votes

It’s deeper than that. 

[Realville]

The courts give foreign terrorists captured and held abroad by our military “standing” but not Texas.

 

[Reagan]

2 hours ago, Realville said:

The courts give foreign terrorists captured and held abroad by our military “standing” but not Texas.

 

Good point!

[Realville]

 

 

[baddog]

10 minutes ago, Realville said:

 

 

Only one reason.....they have something to hide. Why would anyone NOT want to know the findings? Communists!

[BS Wildcats]

The sad thing is they are going to get away with it.  It will be a sad thing when these heathens begin their reign in a few weeks.  Kiss America as we have known it by!!

[Realville]

 

 

[BLUEDOVE3]

On 12/11/2020 at 8:13 PM, Realville said:

When they refuse to listen to the evidence - the fix is in. 

December 13. 2a20 - 1 0:46 AM EST 

Chris Christie calls Trump's 
legal team's legal theory an 
'absurdity ' 

[Reagan]

On 12/11/2020 at 5:49 PM, Big girl said:

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

The Supreme Court didn't say anything about it be seditious!  They said it didn't have standing.  There's no doubt Pennsylvania broke Constitutional laws. 

[Reagan]

2 hours ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

December 13. 2a20 - 1 0:46 AM EST 

Chris Christie calls Trump's 
legal team's legal theory an 
'absurdity ' 

The RINO must not be paying attention.  BTW -- I heard a little while ago that Sydney Powell said that the Supreme Court has her lawsuits of fraud by these 4 states.  Getting interesting.   Dove -- I know it looks like you got what you wanted.  But if this election was compromised with fraud -- does this, would this, bother you?