Here You Go Dimwits

[baddog]

Ari Fleischer: Impeachment stalemate 'the dumbest thing Democrats have ever done'

 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 

Explore the Fox News apps that are right for you at

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[UT alum]

And Ari Fleischer is? Only time will tell what this all will bring.

[baddog]

  On 12/22/2019 at 3:35 PM, UT alum said:

And Ari Fleischer is? Only time will tell what this all will bring.

Expand  

Why hold back these articles of impeachment?

[BS Wildcats]

  On 12/22/2019 at 4:55 PM, baddog said:

Why hold back these articles of impeachment?

Expand  

Pelosi knew that the dims didn't have a leg to stand on with this impeachment.  She was pressured by the idiots Schiff and Nadler to proceed.  Now she doesn't want the real truth to come out about Biden's, Clinton's, and obama's dealings with Ukraine and Russia.  So she will sit on the articles as long as she can.

[UT alum]

  On 12/22/2019 at 4:55 PM, baddog said:

Why hold back these articles of impeachment?

Expand  

To be ensure a fair trial. Fair trials have witnesses and evidence. Impeachment hearings were not a trial.

[BS Wildcats]

  On 12/23/2019 at 9:25 PM, UT alum said:

To be ensure a fair trial. Fair trials have witnesses and evidence. Impeachment hearings were not a trial.

Expand  

She has no control over what happens in the Senate.  I'm guessing you called what happened in the House fair?

[UT alum]

  On 12/23/2019 at 9:39 PM, BS Wildcats said:

She has no control over what happens in the Senate.  I'm guessing you called what happened in the House fair?

Expand  

Not entirely. The White House refused both documents and testimony from relevant witnesses. 

[Reagan]

  On 12/23/2019 at 9:25 PM, UT alum said:

To be ensure a fair trial. Fair trials have witnesses and evidence. Impeachment hearings were not a trial.

Expand  

In American jurisprudence, fairness is for the accused, not the accuser.  So, since when does pelosie want a fair trial for President Trump?  By the way -- what was fair about what schiff and nadler was doing??

[UT alum]

  On 12/23/2019 at 9:51 PM, Reagan said:

In American jurisprudence, fairness is for the accused, not the accuser.  So, since when does pelosie want a fair trial for President Trump?  By the way -- what was fair about what schiff and nadler was doing??

Expand  

In American jurisprudence, if the accused doesn’t comply with subpoenas, they go to jail.

[baddog]

  On 12/23/2019 at 9:25 PM, UT alum said:

To be ensure a fair trial. Fair trials have witnesses and evidence. Impeachment hearings were not a trial.

Expand  

Why weren’t these witnesses called during the hearings? The Republicans didn’t get to call the witnesses they wanted. WTF do you call fair?Actually, I hate the term. In order to be fair to one side, you have to screw the heck out of the other.

 The senate could throw this out because they own the rules now, not shiff. Pelosi is playing games. You supposedly have your charges, bring them to trial. 

[Reagan]

  On 12/23/2019 at 10:02 PM, UT alum said:

In American jurisprudence, if the accused doesn’t comply with subpoenas, they go to jail.

Expand  

Every president since George Washington has exerted executive privilege!

PS -- what did eric holder do here?

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[baddog]

  On 12/23/2019 at 10:31 PM, Reagan said:

Every president since George Washington has exerted executive privilege!

PS -- what did eric holder do here?

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Expand  

He’s black. He gets a pass.

[UT alum]

  On 12/23/2019 at 10:14 PM, baddog said:

Why weren’t these witnesses called during the hearings? The Republicans didn’t get to call the witnesses they wanted. WTF do you call fair?Actually, I hate the term. In order to be fair to one side, you have to screw the heck out of the other.

 The senate could throw this out because they own the rules now, not shiff. Pelosi is playing games. You supposedly have your charges, bring them to trial. 

Expand  

Accused does not have right to present witnesses in a Grand Jury proceeding.

[UT alum]

  On 12/23/2019 at 10:31 PM, Reagan said:

Every president since George Washington has exerted executive privilege!

PS -- what did eric holder do here?

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Expand  

“What about” Holder?

I don’t believe Washington was ever subpoenaed.

[baddog]

  On 12/23/2019 at 11:07 PM, UT alum said:

Accused does not have right to present witnesses in a Grand Jury proceeding.

Expand  

No, the witnesses Schumer says he wants to call. They could have already been called. Quit playing girly games. You know to whom I am referring.

[BS Wildcats]

  On 12/23/2019 at 9:25 PM, UT alum said:

To be ensure a fair trial. Fair trials have witnesses and evidence. Impeachment hearings were not a trial.

Expand  

Trump was never going to get a fair shake from the dims.  They have been concocting some way to impeach him since Crooked Hillary lost the election.  And again, you call their process fair?  Laughable!

[UT alum]

  On 12/23/2019 at 11:37 PM, BS Wildcats said:

Trump was never going to get a fair shake from the dims.  They have been concocting some way to impeach him since Crooked Hillary lost the election.  And again, you call their process fair?  Laughable!

Expand  

He had every chance to provide all the exculpatory evidence and testimony he wanted. He didn’t because he can’t.

[BS Wildcats]

  On 12/24/2019 at 12:19 AM, UT alum said:

He had every chance to provide all the exculpatory evidence and testimony he wanted. He didn’t because he can’t.

Expand  

Didn't you, in almost the same breath, say the accused has no right to present witnesses in a Grand Jury hearing?  So, how can you now say he had a chance present such.

[UT alum]

He will, at trial. I believe the Chief Justice has a say in the witness’ relevance to the case.

[UT alum]

  On 12/24/2019 at 12:29 AM, BS Wildcats said:

Didn't you, in almost the same breath, say the accused has no right to present witnesses in a Grand Jury hearing?  So, how can you now say he had a chance present such.

Expand  

He will,at trial. I believe the Chief Justice will have a say about each witness’ relevance to the case.

[Reagan]

  On 12/23/2019 at 9:25 PM, UT alum said:

To be ensure a fair trial. Fair trials have witnesses and evidence. Impeachment hearings were not a trial.

Expand  

Where in the Constitution does it say that the House has any say-so in how the trial is ran?

[BS Wildcats]

  On 12/24/2019 at 1:40 AM, Reagan said:

Where in the Constitution does it say that the House has any say-so in how the trial is ran?

Expand  

Don't think it does, but the dimwits wanna talk about Trump and the Constitution laws he has broken.  Guess if you're a dimwit, you are allowed to do what you want.

[LumRaiderFan]

  On 12/24/2019 at 1:40 AM, Reagan said:

Where in the Constitution does it say that the House has any say-so in how the trial is ran?

Expand  

Reagan, you’re talking to a Democrat.  Remember, to them the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties.

 

[baddog]

  On 12/23/2019 at 11:07 PM, UT alum said:

Accused does not have right to present witnesses in a Grand Jury proceeding.

Expand  

.....and a true Grand Jury would realize there is not enough evidence to go to trial and the accused would be “no billed”.

[UT alum]

  On 12/24/2019 at 1:40 AM, Reagan said:

Where in the Constitution does it say that the House has any say-so in how the trial is ran?

Expand  

I believe the Constitution says that the Senate shall have the power to try all impeachments. Don’t say jack about how the House has to go about delivering the articles, other than they be physically delivered to the Senate.