LumRaiderFan Posted November 16, 2019 Report Posted November 16, 2019 On 11/16/2019 at 7:08 PM, UT alum said: As long as they suppress free elections in their country, and have a foreign policy that seeks to promote the same in other countries, yeah, that makes up my kind Expand That’s what the Democrats do... you don’t approve? Quote
baddog Posted November 16, 2019 Report Posted November 16, 2019 On 11/16/2019 at 7:05 PM, UT alum said: Did you choke on those words as you tapped them in? Expand Great comeback......typical Quote
Big girl Posted November 17, 2019 Report Posted November 17, 2019 On 11/16/2019 at 12:31 AM, UT alum said: “What about...” is the only argument you guys got. Sad. Expand It is extremely sad. Quote
BS Wildcats Posted November 17, 2019 Report Posted November 17, 2019 On 11/17/2019 at 4:55 AM, Big girl said: It is extremely sad. Expand What? How the Biden's are skating free in their corrupt dealings with Ukraine? Quote
Big girl Posted November 17, 2019 Report Posted November 17, 2019 On 11/17/2019 at 5:33 AM, BS Wildcats said: What? How the Biden's are skating free in their corrupt dealings with Ukraine? Expand The Biden's were cleared of any wrongdoing. This occurred before Trump asked for an investigation. Quote
BS Wildcats Posted November 17, 2019 Report Posted November 17, 2019 On 11/17/2019 at 7:40 PM, Big girl said: The Biden's were cleared of any wrongdoing. This occurred before Trump asked for an investigation. Expand Cleared by who, Shifty Schiff. The Biden's are dirty, and everybody knows it. More on their deals will come to light. Democrats are digging for any charge they think will stick to get Trump out of office. He has done so much better for the country than your previous golden boy did, and not one Dimocrat can handle that fact. Trump in 2020, don't you love it? Quote
Reagan Posted November 17, 2019 Report Posted November 17, 2019 On 11/17/2019 at 7:40 PM, Big girl said: The Biden's were cleared of any wrongdoing. This occurred before Trump asked for an investigation. Expand This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up From the Youtube clip: "And I had gotten a commitment from Poroshenko and from Yatsenyuk that they would take action against the state prosecutor. And they didn’t. So they said they had—they were walking out to a press conference. I said, nah, I’m not going to—or, we’re not going to give you the billion dollars. They said, you have no authority. You’re not the president. The president said—I said, call him. (Laughter.) I (Biden) said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion. I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money. Well, son of a b-tch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time." If I'm not mistaken, this prosecutor was looking into his crooked son's dealings in the Ukraine concerning Burisma! Looks like "Quid Pro Quo" to me! Quote
BS Wildcats Posted November 18, 2019 Report Posted November 18, 2019 On 11/17/2019 at 9:08 PM, Reagan said: This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up From the Youtube clip: "And I had gotten a commitment from Poroshenko and from Yatsenyuk that they would take action against the state prosecutor. And they didn’t. So they said they had—they were walking out to a press conference. I said, nah, I’m not going to—or, we’re not going to give you the billion dollars. They said, you have no authority. You’re not the president. The president said—I said, call him. (Laughter.) I (Biden) said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion. I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money. Well, son of a b-tch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time." If I'm not mistaken, this prosecutor was looking into his crooked son's dealings in the Ukraine concerning Burisma! Looks like "Quid Pro Quo" to me! Expand Dimocrats are blind to facts. You can tell that by the sound of crickets. Quote
baddog Posted November 18, 2019 Report Posted November 18, 2019 On 11/17/2019 at 4:55 AM, Big girl said: It is extremely sad. Expand All we heard from you and your cronies during the Obama years, was how V.P. Dick Cheney had shady dealings with his Halliburton connection. You are a two-faced demoncrat. Some may think an idoit. BS Wildcats 1 Quote
UT alum Posted November 18, 2019 Author Report Posted November 18, 2019 On 11/16/2019 at 8:18 PM, LumRaiderFan said: That’s what the Democrats do... you don’t approve? Expand What are you even talking about? Quote
UT alum Posted November 18, 2019 Author Report Posted November 18, 2019 On 11/16/2019 at 1:52 AM, BS Wildcats said: The problem is the Dims say nothing about Biden and Hussein Obama strong arming Ukraine, but get all beside themselves if they think Trump did the same. Free pass from the Demoncrats. It all boils down to them knowing they can't beat him at the polls, plain and simple. Expand The problem is, if Vice President Biden and President Obama did any strong arming, it was done trying to support official US foreign policy of seeking to reduce corruption in Ukraine. Trump’s strong arming was to support his own personal agenda, not stated US foreign policy. jdns 1 Quote
UT alum Posted November 18, 2019 Author Report Posted November 18, 2019 On 11/18/2019 at 12:31 AM, BS Wildcats said: Dimocrats are blind to facts. You can tell that by the sound of crickets. Expand You are mistaken. Prosecutor was supposedly doing these things, but really wasn’t. US wanted to see someone in the position who would really stand up to the oligarchs. Again, trying to further US policy, not their own. Quote
baddog Posted November 18, 2019 Report Posted November 18, 2019 On 11/18/2019 at 12:55 PM, UT alum said: The problem is, if Vice President Biden and President Obama did any strong arming, it was done trying to support official US foreign policy of seeking to reduce corruption in Ukraine. Trump’s strong arming was to support his own personal agenda, not stated US foreign policy. Expand Hunter Biden’s company was being investigated for corruption. Daddy Biden called and told them he was withholding $ billions unless they fired the investigator. Daddy Biden even admitted he did just that. Was that for US foreign policy or Daddy protecting his crooked son? How does anyone get that confused? Quote
UT alum Posted November 18, 2019 Author Report Posted November 18, 2019 On 11/18/2019 at 1:58 PM, baddog said: Hunter Biden’s company was being investigated for corruption. Daddy Biden called and told them he was withholding $ billions unless they fired the investigator. Daddy Biden even admitted he did just that. Was that for US foreign policy or Daddy protecting his crooked son? How does anyone get that confused? Expand What is your source for that? Alex Jones? Quote
stevenash Posted November 18, 2019 Report Posted November 18, 2019 Hmmm Looks like whenever someone offers a point of contention that might incriminate a lefty, you simply discredit the source. Pretty convenient. Quote
UT alum Posted November 18, 2019 Author Report Posted November 18, 2019 On 11/18/2019 at 2:54 PM, stevenash said: Hmmm Looks like whenever someone offers a point of contention that might incriminate a lefty, you simply discredit the source. Pretty convenient. Expand Jeez, dude, the right’s whole agenda rests on the premise that every source that does not follow its narrative is fake news. That discredits many sources. How can you make a point that is at odds with itself? jdns and Boyz N Da Hood 2 Quote
BS Wildcats Posted November 18, 2019 Report Posted November 18, 2019 On 11/18/2019 at 12:55 PM, UT alum said: The problem is, if Vice President Biden and President Obama did any strong arming, it was done trying to support official US foreign policy of seeking to reduce corruption in Ukraine. Trump’s strong arming was to support his own personal agenda, not stated US foreign policy. Expand Crazy Joe trying to help his son is not a personal agenda? Wake up Quote
UT alum Posted November 18, 2019 Author Report Posted November 18, 2019 On 11/18/2019 at 4:27 PM, BS Wildcats said: Crazy Joe trying to help his son is not a personal agenda? Wake up Expand Then why is dept. of justice department not on it? That’s where the investigation of that allegation belongs. Go back to sleep. Quote
UT alum Posted November 18, 2019 Author Report Posted November 18, 2019 On 11/15/2019 at 2:35 PM, stevenash said: According to you, this is not credible because it is not under oath. Expand That is so weak. My statement about under oath was whether a statement of fact is more believable made by someone under oath, or someone not. When no one is under oath, I judge for myself what I believe to be credible. The way you twist logic, man, you should open a pretzel shop. Quote
stevenash Posted November 18, 2019 Report Posted November 18, 2019 I guess that would mean that you honestly believe that the circumstances, as presented by the vast majority of the media, are presented without bias? Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted November 18, 2019 Report Posted November 18, 2019 On 11/18/2019 at 1:44 AM, UT alum said: What are you even talking about? Expand Come on now...you have never seen the voting issues that always happen in close races in heavily Democrat areas? Democrats hate a fair playing field. Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted November 18, 2019 Report Posted November 18, 2019 On 11/18/2019 at 2:00 PM, UT alum said: What is your source for that? Alex Jones? Expand Have you not seen the video of Joe himself bragging about doing exactly this? Quote
UT alum Posted November 18, 2019 Author Report Posted November 18, 2019 On 11/18/2019 at 5:07 PM, stevenash said: I guess that would mean that you honestly believe that the circumstances, as presented by the vast majority of the media, are presented without bias? Expand No, both sides manipulate it to keep us at odds to sell advertising. I believe good reporting exists, one just must be vigilant of one’s sources. Quote
UT alum Posted November 18, 2019 Author Report Posted November 18, 2019 On 11/18/2019 at 6:37 PM, LumRaiderFan said: Have you not seen the video of Joe himself bragging about doing exactly this? Expand Did you not see my post discerning the difference between that and what Trump has done? Quote
baddog Posted November 18, 2019 Report Posted November 18, 2019 On 11/18/2019 at 2:00 PM, UT alum said: What is your source for that? Alex Jones? Expand I guess this clip would not be shown on cnn. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.