Westbrook Eligibility

[Football52]

I saw the minutes from the UIL executive meeting, and noticed that two different WB eligibility questions were raised. One denied, one upheld. Anyone know if either of these applied to the kid from HJ?

[AggiesAreWe]

  On 11/10/2016 at 2:21 PM, Football52 said:

I saw the minutes from the UIL executive meeting, and noticed that two different WB eligibility questions were raised. One denied, one upheld. Anyone know if either of these applied to the kid from HJ?

Expand  

 

  On 11/10/2016 at 2:21 PM, Football52 said:

I saw the minutes from the UIL executive meeting, and noticed that two different WB eligibility questions were raised. One denied, one upheld. Anyone know if either of these applied to the kid from HJ?

Expand  

 

It' my understanding the Carpenter kid was ruled eligible, the Parquet kid ruled ineligible.

[BLUEDOVE3]

  On 11/10/2016 at 2:36 PM, AggiesAreWe said:

 

 

It' my understanding the Carpenter kid was ruled eligible, the Parquet kid ruled ineligible.

Expand  

I can't remember but the Carpenter leave WB to HJ or vice versa? I brought him up on the forum some weeks ago.

[AggiesAreWe]

  On 11/10/2016 at 3:20 PM, BLUEDOVE3 said:

I can't remember but the Carpenter leave WB to HJ or vice versa? I brought him up on the forum some weeks ago.

Expand  

Was in the BISD middle schools, then went to HJ for his freshman year (last year). He is now back at West Brook.

[winwin]

  On 11/10/2016 at 3:28 PM, AggiesAreWe said:

Was in the BISD middle schools, then went to HJ for his freshman year (last year). He is now back at West Brook.

Expand  

And has always lived in the West Brook zone. HJ has open enrollment. 

[AggiesAreWe]

  On 11/10/2016 at 3:38 PM, winwin said:

And has always lived in the West Brook zone. HJ has open enrollment. 

Expand  

Correct

[kingjames]

  On 11/10/2016 at 2:36 PM, AggiesAreWe said:

 

 

It' my understanding the Carpenter kid was ruled eligible, the Parquet kid ruled ineligible.

Expand  

Unfortunate for the kid that was ruled ineligible. Parents should educate themselves on the rules better so that the kids want have to lose a year of varsity sports no one lose her but the kid.

[Guest]

He shouldn't have left HJ

[Mamba]

Sometimes just keeping your mouth shut isnt so bad 

[BADSANTA]

Parquet can't play this year? That isn't cool at all. 

[kingjames]

  On 11/10/2016 at 4:44 PM, aTmfan06 said:

He shouldn't have left HJ

Expand  

 

  On 11/10/2016 at 4:46 PM, BlkMamba24 said:

Sometimes just keeping your mouth shut isnt so bad 

Expand  

First off who am I to say where the kids should've stayed I was just making a point if you gonna move kid make sure you know the rules. Apparently it was an issue at HJ for the parents to move the kid and that's the right of the parents and kid just know the rules.

Secondly Mamba you're correct but sometimes people can't do that for the better of the kid. I figured it would be a losing battle you have to pick your fights and have ducks in a row.

[Football52]

  On 11/10/2016 at 4:53 PM, BADSANTA said:

Parquet can't play this year? That isn't cool at all. 

Expand  

Look for him to suit up for Kelly.

[AggiesAreWe]

  On 11/10/2016 at 6:01 PM, Football52 said:

Look for him to suit up for Kelly.

Expand  

Doubt it.

[kingjames]

  On 11/10/2016 at 6:08 PM, AggiesAreWe said:

Doubt it.

Expand  

 

  On 11/10/2016 at 6:01 PM, Football52 said:

Look for him to suit up for Kelly.

Expand  

Probably passed the open enrollment time private school is very different

[winwin]

  On 11/10/2016 at 6:01 PM, Football52 said:

Look for him to suit up for Kelly.

Expand  

Too late for this season. Not to mention, any move they make now to any school would be an obvious basketball reason after the UIL decision. 

[Football52]

  On 11/10/2016 at 6:24 PM, winwin said:

Too late for this season. Not to mention, any move they make now to any school would be an obvious basketball reason after the UIL decision. 

Expand  

I was more thinking of a move to a private like we saw with Mayfield in football. I can't imagine a situation where the kid will just eat a year sitting out doing nothing.

[TxHoops]

I can't speak for his family but I don't think many who understand the process are surprised with the ruling on Parquet.  Most expected him to be on JV this year.  I applaud the decision on Carpenter though.  That move had zero to do with basketball. 

[winwin]

  On 11/10/2016 at 6:43 PM, Football52 said:

I was more thinking of a move to a private like we saw with Mayfield in football. I can't imagine a situation where the kid will just eat a year sitting out doing nothing.

Expand  

Even the private schools have restrictions about kids coming over for athletic purposes. The UIL decision is a red flag

[Football52]

  On 11/10/2016 at 6:51 PM, winwin said:

Even the private schools have restrictions about kids coming over for athletic purposes. The UIL decision is a red flag

Expand  

This must be a joke. Kelly has made a living off of kids "coming over for athletic purposes". It's so common that it's openly joked about on these boards. So you're telling me that if he tried to enroll today, he would be denied?

[ST413]

Those previous kids didnt have the earmark of being deemed ineligible by the UiL, did they.  Remember Mayfield was never a uil eligibility issue just a team rules issue.

[Mamba]

  On 11/10/2016 at 2:36 PM, AggiesAreWe said:

 

 

It' my understanding the Carpenter kid was ruled eligible, the Parquet kid ruled ineligible.

Expand  

Couldve it have been for both brothers players A&B ?

[winwin]

  On 11/10/2016 at 6:52 PM, Football52 said:

This must be a joke. Kelly has made a living off of kids "coming over for athletic purposes". It's so common that it's openly joked about on these boards. So you're telling me that if he tried to enroll today, he would be denied?

Expand  

Every kid that has transferred to Kelly has had to have the previous participation form signed by the previous school stating that the move was not for athletic purposes. If he enrolled at Kelly today he would be accepted into the school. Being eligible to play Varsity sports would be up to TAPPS and you can bet the other schools in that District would be definitely protesting that

[Mamba]

  On 11/10/2016 at 6:52 PM, Football52 said:

This must be a joke. Kelly has made a living off of kids "coming over for athletic purposes". It's so common that it's openly joked about on these boards. So you're telling me that if he tried to enroll today, he would be denied?

Expand  

He has passed the deadline for certification i think thats what its called. Kids could leave low performing schools such as Ozen or Central and enroll in Kelly. In most cases most coaches wont check the boxes on the PAPF form unless the kid or parents are being well u know

[kingjames]

  On 11/10/2016 at 7:05 PM, winwin said:

Every kid that has transferred to Kelly has had to have the previous participation form signed by the previous school stating that the move was not for athletic purposes. If he enrolled at Kelly today he would be accepted into the school. Being eligible to play Varsity sports would be up to TAPPS and you can bet the other schools in that District would be definitely protesting that

Expand  

I agree with that. From my understanding its more kids going thru the same process.

[AggiesAreWe]

  On 11/10/2016 at 7:03 PM, BlkMamba24 said:

Couldve it have been for both brothers players A&B ?

Expand  

That's a possibility. But the post stated one was ruled eligible, the other ineligible. Can't see the older Parquet being ruled eligible and the younger ruled ineligible.