Jump to content

Heard In passing: Dems talking about sexual immorality.

5GallonBucket

By 5GallonBucket
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

5GallonBucket

5GallonBucket

Posted
Posted

There was a voting area where I work on May 24th in Jefferson County.  Run off between Democrats Zena Stephens and Joe Stevenson.  In that area there was representatives of both parties along with others (supervising the voting machines).  I overheard there conversation about TV shows/hollywood and how the increase of gay relations on TV has gotten ridiculous.  Basically the gist of it....they were complaining about it and don't understand why/how it has gotten that way.

Now given that most Dems always vote dem and most REP always vote rep.  

I know that politicians don't have much of a say on what is put on the TV screen, but they do have a say in laws and the reason they have that ability is because people vote for them. 

So how can they complain/don't understand when most of them voted for the individuals who have allowed/enabled a societal change?

It is so simple to me I am baffled by it.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gohornets23

gohornets23

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, 5GallonBucket said:

There was a voting area where I work on May 24th in Jefferson County.  Run off between Democrats Zena Stephens and Joe Stevenson.  In that area there was representatives of both parties along with others (supervising the voting machines).  I overheard there conversation about TV shows/hollywood and how the increase of gay relations on TV has gotten ridiculous.  Basically the gist of it....they were complaining about it and don't understand why/how it has gotten that way.

Now given that most Dems always vote dem and most REP always vote rep.  

I know that politicians don't have much of a say on what is put on the TV screen, but they do have a say in laws and the reason they have that ability is because people vote for them. 

So how can they complain/don't understand when most of them voted for the individuals who have allowed/enabled a societal change?

It is so simple to me I am baffled by it.....

I think this guy does a good job explaining it from the side of democratic congressman, there is a musical part and then it shows him talking, right at one minute in..

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tvc184

tvc184

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, 5GallonBucket said:

 

.......So how can they complain/don't understand when most of them voted for the individuals who have allowed/enabled a societal change?

It is so simple to me I am baffled by it.....

How do politician "allow" society changes? Can they stop it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hagar

Hagar

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, tvc184 said:

How do politician "allow" society changes? Can they stop it?

i would think voting yea or nay on a SCOTUS nomination.  And then, only in rare instances.  And Obama's Royal Decree on bathrooms/locker rooms, which I think is illegal.  Once again, I fall back on my disclaimer that Matlock never had a case like that, so I'm not sure :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
5GallonBucket

5GallonBucket

Posted
  • Author
Posted
5 hours ago, tvc184 said:

How do politician "allow" society changes? Can they stop it?

A bit surprised of your questions given your law enforcement background.  Do we not have laws now that deal with gay/transgender issues....  those laws came about by politicians   house, senate, potus, scotus  

changes in laws or the creation of new ones have enabled such movements

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tvc184

tvc184

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, 5GallonBucket said:

A bit surprised of your questions given your law enforcement background.  Do we not have laws now that deal with gay/transgender issues....  those laws came about by politicians   house, senate, potus, scotus  

changes in laws or the creation of new ones have enabled such movements

I do not know any laws that I deal with that has anything to do with those issues. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nappyroots

nappyroots

Posted
Posted
On 5/26/2016 at 2:13 PM, 5GallonBucket said:

A bit surprised of your questions given your law enforcement background.  Do we not have laws now that deal with gay/transgender issues....  those laws came about by politicians   house, senate, potus, scotus  

changes in laws or the creation of new ones have enabled such movements

The equal rights laws started years ago, to allow blacks to use the restroom and other facilities

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • BBfan061
      2024 Countdown to Kickoff

      By BBfan061 · Posted

      Tic tock 
    • Separation Scientist
      Dang "Erectionists"!

      By Separation Scientist · Posted

      To clarify, Dems love wars. They rage daily in the bluest of blue inner citicis. Chicago had 39 shootings over the weekend, 9 dead. Warzone. Baltimore, Memphis, Detroit, etc. I am sure was just as bloody. The blue body count rises daily. I am sure the blue defunding of police and releasing murders without any bail have nothing to do with it. Right?   
    • BS Wildcats
      Fake Pandemic Scam Part 2?!

      By BS Wildcats · Posted

      Will probably be released by the Democrats come September.  Sound familiar?
    • 72 Pinto
      Bridge City is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • bullets13
      Bridge City is open

      By bullets13 · Posted

      I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...