Jump to content

Bryan Rudder 78 Barbers Hill 77/Final

MHSBulldogs

By MHSBulldogs
in High School Girls Basketball

 Share

Recommended Posts

Hoopster-007

Hoopster-007

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, Bronco/Cat Fan said:

Rudder shot lights out and played a good overall game. Congratulations to them. The six point turnaround at the end of the third hurt Barbers Hill, but they were in the game all the way. Congratulations to the Eagles on a great season. 

Bronco/Cat Fan, I agree "Rudder shot lights out and played a good overall game."  There were a couple of scoring "turnarounds" that really hurt Barbers Hill, particularly when BH's post player (Charli) was substituted out the game.  Personally, I thought the Rudder game was one of Charli's best games, along with several other BH players who stepped up and made big shots.  

This young team had an awesome season and I am really proud of them. As a fan/parent, I would probably be content with our play against Rudder; however, as someone who knows better, our defensive play over the last several years continues to hurt us in big games. Rudder is a very good team, played good overall basketball; and once again defeated a BH team that I personally believe should not have lost.

Great season Lady Eagles. You guys had an awesome season!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bronco/Cat Fan

Bronco/Cat Fan

Posted
Posted

The difference between last year and this year was very evident. The emergence of the young players and their confident play was a pleasure to watch. Of course, Charli's growth as a player was evident also. The next two years for them should be very exciting. There is always room for improvement and I hope to see fewer turnovers and more contested three point attempts,but again congratulations on a great season to all involved with the Barbers Hill Lady Eagles..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hoopster-007

Hoopster-007

Posted
Posted

Personally, I do not believe "turnovers" were the primary cause for the loss; however, the turnovers that occurred during the two "turnarounds" were damaging.  Often, turnovers can be minimized by knowing one's personnel and knowing who to have on the floor at given times and situations.

Yes, there is always room for improvement, but if the main issue is "defense," that, in my opinion, is unacceptable for a team who is to be among the elite.  There's significantly more to defense than pointing out who to guard or simply standing in one's spot while in a zone defense.  You mentioned one aspect of defense, i.e., "contesting three point attempts." Well, on the surface, that seems simple and easy; however, it involves several defensive drills in order to perfect.  It makes no sense for an elite team to have to get out of man defense because its ineffective and into a zone defense that looks almost as badly.  Of course, one's zone defense is only going to be as effective as one's man defense because the zone defense is based on man principles.  A good zone looks like a man....and a good man looks like a zone.  Example, the 1st quarter of Crosby against Rudder, Crosby applied very good half-court man defense against Rudder and was up 18-2 at the end of the 1st quarter. Be that as it may be, great season for the young team, but their youth is not the reason they are not going to San Antonio.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bronco/Cat Fan

Bronco/Cat Fan

Posted
Posted

I do not think nor did I state turnovers were the primary reason BH lost to Rudder. There a numerous things you could point to including who comes into the game off the bench at particular times and others you have pointed out.I would think that those issues will be worked on. I am just a fan who enjoys watching the game, not a coach. I have attended a lot of the Lady Eagles games since around '96 and followed them in the paper some before that. I hope they have even greater success in the future, as I'm sure you do too..

On 3/1/2016 at 6:03 PM, Hoopster-007 said:

Personally, I do not believe "turnovers" were the primary cause for the loss; however, the turnovers that occurred during the two "turnarounds" were damaging.  Often, turnovers can be minimized by knowing one's personnel and knowing who to have on the floor at given times and situations.

Yes, there is always room for improvement, but if the main issue is "defense," that, in my opinion, is unacceptable for a team who is to be among the elite.  There's significantly more to defense than pointing out who to guard or simply standing in one's spot while in a zone defense.  You mentioned one aspect of defense, i.e., "contesting three point attempts." Well, on the surface, that seems simple and easy; however, it involves several defensive drills in order to perfect.  It makes no sense for an elite team to have to get out of man defense because its ineffective and into a zone defense that looks almost as badly.  Of course, one's zone defense is only going to be as effective as one's man defense because the zone defense is based on man principles.  A good zone looks like a man....and a good man looks like a zone.  Example, the 1st quarter of Crosby against Rudder, Crosby applied very good half-court man defense against Rudder and was up 18-2 at the end of the 1st quarter. Be that as it may be, great season for the young team, but their youth is not the reason they are not going to San Antonio.

 

. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • BS Wildcats
      Fake Pandemic Scam Part 2?!

      By BS Wildcats · Posted

      Will probably be released by the Democrats come September.  Sound familiar?
    • 72 Pinto
      Bridge City is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • bullets13
      Bridge City is open

      By bullets13 · Posted

      I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • Eagles12
      Bridge City is open

      By Eagles12 · Posted

      He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • 72 Pinto
      LC-M is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...