Gabe Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 On 2/18/2016 at 10:11 PM, RaiderRed30 said: Key word is only for football. No decision has been made for basketball and other sports. Expand This would be for all sports. It is a move up in classifications from 4A to 5A Quote
RaiderRed30 Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 Very surpised that Central did not win, Amarillo must have a lot of pull within UIL. Hays and Lehman not moving means passing through Austin ISD's district to travel to North Austin, while San Marcos travels through both schools to Austin ISD. Just all around confusing. West Brook was probably the best outcome they could get. Alice and Calallen is the most shocking thing. I understand travel distance, but UIL swore off 11 team districts after the Fort Worth disaster. Now one team in their district is only going to have 9 games with a bye at the end of the season. Quote
RaiderRed30 Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 On 2/18/2016 at 10:13 PM, Gabe said: This would be for all sports. It is a move up in classifications from 4A to 5A Expand I thought I read somewhere that no decision has been made for other sports. Only football was decided today. Quote
Gabe Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 On 2/18/2016 at 10:16 PM, RaiderRed30 said: I thought I read somewhere that no decision has been made for other sports. Only football was decided today. Expand I am pretty certain this would mean all sports in Llvingston's case going up in a classification. You can't play 4A all other sports and football 5A. Quote
AshlyHasBeen Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 No decision has been made for all sports in regards to Livingston. West Brook will be playing in a different district for football than the rest of sports. Keep that in mind. Quote
CRUSHCOACH Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 But you're talking classifications with Livingston. They won't be allowed to play in 5A for football and 4A for other sports. Quote
Gabe Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 On 2/18/2016 at 10:20 PM, ShlyKBMT said: No decision has been made for all sports in regards to Livingston. West Brook will be playing in a different district for football than the rest of sports. Keep that in mind. Expand My mistake then. I guess they could stick them in another 5A district for other sports. I wasn't think of that. My mistake Quote
AshlyHasBeen Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 On 2/18/2016 at 10:22 PM, CRUSHCOACH said: But you're talking classifications with Livingston. They won't be allowed to play in 5A for football and 4A for other sports. Expand Yes, but they could be assigned to a different district for other sports just like West Brook. Quote
AshlyHasBeen Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 Flanigan was unaware that Livingston was added until I just messaged him. I'm sure BISD will be getting involved. I would think they would force Central and WB to play week 1. Gabe 1 Quote
wo-76 Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 what district in 4a did Livingston.. move from.they will be searching for a non district game.what are the teams in that district? Quote
Gabe Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 District 10-4A DI with BC Cleveland Huffman Navasota LCM and Silsbee Quote
Alpha Wolf Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 On 2/18/2016 at 10:25 PM, ShlyKBMT said: Flanigan was unaware that Livingston was added until I just messaged him. I'm sure BISD will be getting involved. I would think they would force Central and WB to play week 1. Expand Yea, more than I want... Quote
RaiderGirl2010 Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 Ugh hate the drive to Livingston CAL2TEX 1 Quote
wo-76 Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 This may open door for WOS.Huffman Navasota and Cleveland will need a non distict game.Also teams in 5A that lost a non district game. Quote
WOSgrad Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 On 2/18/2016 at 11:05 PM, wo-76 said: This may open door for WOS.Huffman Navasota and Cleveland will need a non distict game.Also teams in 5A that lost a non district game. Expand WO-S is looking for Week 5, so Huffman, Navasota and Cleveland are possible ones. Quote
WOSgrad Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 Will there, aside from Livingston being moved back up to 5A, be any sanctions against Livingston for turning in the wrong snap shot numbers? Quote
ST413 Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 Good question was wondering that myself. Quote
BMTSoulja1 Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 On 2/18/2016 at 11:03 PM, RaiderGirl2010 said: Ugh hate the drive to Livingston Expand This! I hate it! CAL2TEX, outanup and RaiderGirl2010 3 Quote
RaiderRed30 Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 On 2/18/2016 at 11:08 PM, WOSgrad said: WO-S is looking for Week 5, so Huffman, Navasota and Cleveland are possible ones. Expand Navasota WO-S, yes please. On 2/18/2016 at 11:12 PM, WOSgrad said: Will there, aside from Livingston being moved back up to 5A, be any sanctions against Livingston for turning in the wrong snap shot numbers? Expand I was wondering about TEA. I thought the numbers UIL used were what the districts turned into TEA for money. If they falsified records, then TEA could go after them for money they received that they should not have necessarily received. Quote
ST413 Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 And one of th views of one student is that the superintendent "lied". Quote
Guest Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 On 2/18/2016 at 11:47 PM, ST413 said: And one of th views of one student is that the superintendent "lied". Expand I have heard of this happening a time or two before around these parts. May come back and bite them in the butt. Quote
WOSgrad Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 On 2/18/2016 at 11:40 PM, RaiderRed30 said: I was wondering about TEA. I thought the numbers UIL used were what the districts turned into TEA for money. If they falsified records, then TEA could go after them for money they received that they should not have necessarily received. Expand That is my understanding as well. But it is also that my understanding that their funding would have been less under the numbers that they turned in as opposed to the real numbers. Sounds like somebody just cut off their nose despite their face. CardinalBacker 1 Quote
coachhooker01 Posted February 19, 2016 Report Posted February 19, 2016 On 2/18/2016 at 10:10 PM, RaiderRed30 said: Tried to say travel, even through the district they wanted was actually further. Their new district has Lampasas, Liberty Hill, Burnet, Salado, and Taylor. Expand Yes I looked it but and scratched my head on that doesn't matter the bus doesn't go very fast goof up the hills anyways and either way you go you have a good chance to hit a deer Quote
oldschool2 Posted February 19, 2016 Report Posted February 19, 2016 On 2/18/2016 at 11:12 PM, WOSgrad said: Will there, aside from Livingston being moved back up to 5A, be any sanctions against Livingston for turning in the wrong snap shot numbers? Expand If nothing happens to Livingston...I would turn in 10% less on every snapshot from now on. Might as well chance it if nothing happens.. AthleticSupporter - Jock 1 Quote
Pepper Brooks Posted February 19, 2016 Report Posted February 19, 2016 Livingston just went from a chance to making the playoffs in 4A to virtually no shot in 5A Alpha Wolf, CAL2TEX and CardinalBacker 3 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.