Jump to content

WOS Mustangs vs Gilmer Buckeyes


tennisbc

Recommended Posts

Ok I'll take a look but they beat some pretty salty teams in the playoffs regardless.

well like I said earlier.....we beat about 15 years worth of state championship tradition between LE, Tatum, Carthage and Dangerfield. I know they were all down, but we didn't schedule down. The teams just didn't live up to the tradition. Personally I think we should drop our long standing game with D'field. Once proud tradition is in a downward spiral and they just don't give us much competition.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's be realistic. Wos beat a crappy liberty team, destroyed a Scarborough team that hasn't won a game in five years does that mean we are any less talented? Of course not. I don't care how good or bad you may think a team is cause you can only cruise through the playoffs for so long then you have to earn it. Gilmer and Wos are not in the championship game because one had an easier road to travel. Both had to play their best to reach this stage. I believe this game can go either way. Depends on who executes their game plan the best. That being said "LETS GO MUSTANGS".
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Technically Gilmer had an easy road. You put wos on a schedule with one team over .500 and see how many points they score too. I spent the last half hour putting records together and gilmer has 1 team that was over .500 to wos' 6 teams. Gilmers overall schedule record was 40W-60L before the playoffs and 77W- 73L after. Wos 60W-40L before playoffs and 92W-58L after.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Technically Gilmer had an easy road. You put wos on a schedule with one team over .500 and see how many points they score too. I spent the last half hour putting records together and gilmer has 1 team that was over .500 to wos' 6 teams. Gilmers overall schedule record was 40W-60L before the playoffs and 77W- 73L after. Wos 60W-40L before playoffs and 92W-58L after.

Wow, that sheds some new light on things. Maybe a little false sense of cockiness??? Maybe they narrowly escaped GW because that was the first decent team they played???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I am missing something on the schedule. Gilmer played:

 

Liberty-Eylau 8-6

Tatum 7-6

Bullard 7-4

Pleasant Grove 6-5

Connally 7-5

Gladewater 11-2

Atlanta 12-2

Celina 13-3

 

If you win more than you lose, does that make you "above .500"? I am counting 8 teams with records "above .500". 3 of them prior to the playoffs. It is also worthy of note that Gilmer ended up with one of the highest scoring totals in the history of Texas High School Football. You can say that WOS played a tougher pre-district schedule but you also have to mention that WOS got beat in two games as well. Getting beat by "good" teams is not impressive or a badge of honor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it's the things that most people don't see. I'm not saying it didn't get strightened out but there were several extracurricular activities that were near the end of the game. That's all. Not saying that Sinton had bad sportmanship at all. Just expressing my opinion. It's the feeling you get when you know you are beat and sometimes emotions get the best of you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I am missing something on the schedule. Gilmer played:

Liberty-Eylau 8-6
Tatum 7-6
Bullard 7-4
Pleasant Grove 6-5
Connally 7-5
Gladewater 11-2
Atlanta 12-2
Celina 13-3

If you win more than you lose, does that make you "above .500"? I am counting 8 teams with records "above .500". 3 of them prior to the playoffs. It is also worthy of note that Gilmer ended up with one of the highest scoring totals in the history of Texas High School Football. You can say that WOS played a tougher pre-district schedule but you also have to mention that WOS got beat in two games as well. Getting beat by "good" teams is not impressive or a badge of honor.


liberty 5-5
pine tree 1-9
Tatum 5-5
danger field 1-9
Carthage 5-5
Melissa 4-6
canton 5-5
BULLARD 7-3 ONLY TEAM ABOVE 500 BEFORE PLAYOFFS!!!
community 3-7
rains 4-6

do I need to post the scores too? Anahuac could have went at least 8-2 with this schedule.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined



  • Posts

    • It’s terrible no matter what happened. I am always concerned with the news media and social media outright lies or incorrect information that is put out, maybe in a rush to be first. Watching the video, it is easy to see that some of the earlier claims are simply nonsense. The officer might be cleared or he might face trial but we should be disgusted with the misinformation. Having been on scene or shortly after an officer involved shooting three times, I can say that some information that comes out is a complete fabrication. This is a horrible situation no matter who was at fault. I wish that the nonsensical false information would stop. That won’t happen…..  
    • Trump walks to the beat of a different drummer so he could very likely pick a person that is on no one’s radar. Going by typical political logic, assuming that a VP pick might bring 0.5%-1% votes, who should it be? A half to one percent is not much but in a potentially razor thin election, a couple of thousand votes in a state could decide the presidency. Biden won AZ by just over 10,000 votes. The most recent Beaumont mayoral election, where almost no one votes, had over 15,000 votes cast. In GA it was 12,000 votes and Biden did not even get 50%. In WI it was 20,000 and again Biden didn’t get to 50%.  There are other states in that area of percent point difference. How important? If any two AZ, GA and WI flip, Trump would have won. So while the VP probably never matters…. can it this time? I think that it could. What then does the VP pick bring to the table? FL and SC were both won by Trump in 2020 so a favored son vote for Rubio or Scott won’t help Trump. Both are in a fairly comfortable position within the conservative community so they will neither hurt nor help with strong conservative voters.  What about the few fence riders that could and likely will determine the election by either sticking with Biden or switching from the last election? What about the people who did not vote in the last election, but may come out to vote in this one just to support the VP candidate? Could Scott sway a percentage point or two from Black support? Could Rubio help draw a percentage point or two of Hispanic support? Possibly on both counts. Like I already mentioned, they won’t help in their own states because Trump already won those in 2020. I personally think that either would actually do a good job as president (although VP picks are about the politics of being elected and not the “best” possible president) and might be the difference in a few votes but a few votes more is all that is needed.  Or…. My outlier, Tulsi Gabbard.  She had some decent support when are ran for the presidency in the Democrat primary. Could some people follow her because they support her and not necessarily the party? I’m sure that’s true for all candidates. Could she bring female support? As a strong mentally and physically person and a member of the military who was deployed into a combat zone into Iraq. Then she went to OCS and became an officer, then deployed to Kuwait. Can that military history, including deployment into a war swing some votes? As of late, she has been on a one person tirade against Biden and the Democrats. Let’s remember that Ronald Reagan was a Democrat and so was Texas governor John Connally. Connally was not only a Democrat governor in Texas but also Secretary of the Navy under JFK. Both ended up switching to the Republican Party so there is a fairly strong history of former Democrats switching parties and being successful, all the way up to the presidency. Gabbard is a pretty fiery campaigner and doesn’t mince her words. She would really be a thorn in the Democrats’ hopes and has the inside knowledge of the party. Could she potentially swing more votes than Scott or Rubio? I think so. But…. I don’t think that Trump would pick her and I’m not sure that she would accept if offered. Her odds of being Trump's pick are at about 1%.  Scott or Rubio at about 10%. Trump being Trump, will choose someone who no one has ever heard of. 
    • So biden's a creepy old pedophile after all...shocker! But that's where the smart votes are landing.
    • 🤣🤣🤣  Right on schedule!!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...