Jump to content

obama?

smitty

By smitty
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Mr. Buddy Garrity
Mr. Buddy Garrity

Haters will hate unless their guy (or woman) is in office, nature of the beast, works on both sides the same way, its been that way since before I was born and will probably be that way after I pass.

usedtobe
usedtobe

Is your passport in order?

PAMFAM10
PAMFAM10

I watch all 3 I'm not a one sided person watch all 3 and form my own opinion because that's all that matters

Big girl

Big girl

Posted
Posted

Just curious...what are your trusted news outlets?

news channels that are not biased. Real . Stations. Fox news is not really news. When a station only gives one side of the story and makes up things, such as, the President initiating martial law (2012), and sending drones to steal our guns then I don't take that outlet seriously. I also don't like outlets that go to court to invoke their first amendment right to lie.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted

news channels that are not biased. Real . Stations. Fox news is not really news. When a station only gives one side of the story and makes up things, such as, the President initiating martial law (2012), and sending drones to steal our guns then I don't take that outlet seriously. I also don't like outlets that go to court to invoke their first amendment right to lie.


I'll try again for...what are the news outlets you trust.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted

You can't trust a news channel where the whole staff is Republicans/democrats...Fox/msnbc out off the 3 CNN has to be considered the most fair.


Fox has lots of liberal regulars such as Jaun Williams, Bob Beckel and Kirsten Powers to name a few.

None of the liberal outlets feature nearly as many (if any) conservatives.

Liberals hate Fox because they are #1 ...if you hate it simply change the channel...or actually watch it and draw your own conclusion rather than go on the talking points you hear by other outlets Fox is killing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PAMFAM10

PAMFAM10

Posted
Posted
Haha but cnn have Republicans and Democrats and juan and beckel only co host the five cnn even msnbc have Republican and dems who host msnbc only one. So again how can a show who Clearly favors one side can be fair and balance fox and msnbc slogan should be "the side you Wanna hear"
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted

Haha but cnn have Republicans and Democrats and juan and beckel only co host the five cnn even msnbc have Republican and dems who host msnbc only one. So again how can a show who Clearly favors one side can be fair and balance fox and msnbc slogan should be "the side you Wanna hear"


So don't watch it...problem solved!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
new tobie

new tobie

Posted
Posted

Haha but cnn have Republicans and Democrats and juan and beckel only co host the five cnn even msnbc have Republican and dems who host msnbc only one. So again how can a show who Clearly favors one side can be fair and balance fox and msnbc slogan should be "the side you Wanna hear"

preach on preacher.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted

None of that will explain the FACT that this economic recovery is the weakest since WW2.  If one suggests that it is because the decline was so deep, the deeper the decline, the bigger the recovery.  It hasn't happened.  GDP over the last 5 years has run at about 1/2 of what the average recovery has done.

 

To your point:

 

http://blog.heritage.org/2014/05/04/5-years-obama-real-story/?utm_source=heritagefoundation&utm_medium=email&utm_content=DD140505&utm_campaign=dailydigest

 

From the article:

 

When compared with those in the past, the Obama recovery has been the slowest and weakest since the Great Depression. As The Wall Street Journal notes, the average quarterly GDP growth for all post-1960 recoveries was 4.1 percent, with total growth of 21.1 percent. Compare that to the anemic Obama recovery, which posted an average of 2.2 percent quarterly growth and a total of just 11.1 percent—about half the historic average.

 

Even more marked is the difference between the Obama recovery and the 1982–1983 Reagan recovery, which resulted in GDP growth of 23.1 percent over 17 quarters (25.6 percent for the entire recovery). According the Joint Economic Committee, this translates to a growth deficit of $2 trillion between Obama’s recovery and that under President Reagan. That is $2 trillion more that would be in the hands of U.S. businesses and workers today, when—despite the Obama supporters’ cheery sentiment—many American families are still aching financially.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,967
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...