tvc184

It doesn't matter where the plants are built. The workers will come from several counties to work in them.

I think they are a lot of places in SE Texas. People just don't take in what is around them.

There are a lot of different opinions out there but it is hard to go against that statement.

At least they are getting some notice.

This will all likely be dropped from a felony burglary to a misdemeanor trespassing. They will then get deferred probation meaning that they will likely pay a fine, do some community service and if they stay clean for 6 months, the whole deal will be off of their record.

What a way to start your life after high school, with a felony record.

If you can't win, at least you could look good losing.

At least they can be somebody.

I have the same issue but for saltwater. I can be saltwater fishing in 15 minutes. I could be freshwater fishing just as quick if you count the local canals or Taylor's Bayou. A trip to Rayburn or Toldeo is a couple of hours one way.

... and I caught an amberjack at Toledo Bend. I was fishing for sand sharks and don't know how I hooked the jack.

He is a great player but I doubt that he would be ranked in the top 150 in the country. He could be in the top 50 in Texas and not make the list.

Time to break out the heavy fly rods. ;D

I've eaten them. A good eating fish but a lot of work for what is about the size of a big bream. Even the croaker are bigger.... and just as good to eat.

Yep. For an inshore fish, a red can put up a fight. Once you get out in the Gulf, they don't even rank.

I see a remake of Hitchcock's The Birds.... only the remake will be The Fish.

Saltwater is much better to catch a lot of eating size fish but I would have a hard time saying that they are better to eat. Bass, crappie and catfish fillets can be tough to overcome. Not that snapper, flouder, ling and others are not equal to the task but to pronounce them as better is a bit suspect.

It can be. The flounder fishing is good now and will continue to the fall flouder run. The fall run has a tendency to concentrate them when the first good cold fronts hit and it sends them en masse through the fish passes.

Where are the updates?

Anytime a ball is hit faster, it is more dangerous. Maybe that is acceptable to you and you are entitled to your opinion. To say that they are no more dangerous is a joke. I don't care what the bat material is made of. Why not be like other sports that restrict the speed however. It would be easy to make a bat out of a material other than wood but that has the hitting properties of wood. That would satify the claimed argument that aluminum is more durable and thereby more cost effective.

Notice that the incident was not in Mississippi or Alabama but in Pennsylvania. So much for criticism of us southern rednecks.

Great! Another set of morons give gun control nuts and PETA types a reason to hate hunters and so called sportsmen. What a great sporting idea. Tie a bunch of tame birds down by their legs and shoot them for money.

Sounds like a good flyfishing lake.

I don't know if it is right or wrong but I think it is silly and stupid to say that aluminum bats do not hit the ball harder and faster than wood. The reasoning used? There is no scientific proof. Right.... and cigarettes don't cause cancer either. Just because MIT has yet to study baseball bats doesn't negate what is going on. Let's see, a guy buys his 11 year old kid a baseball bat for $250 because it hits the same way as wood. Talk about things that make you go hmmmmmm!!

Not me. I look forward to it every year but now is the time to fish. About the first part of September I will start turning my attention toward the woods.