tvc184

Here you go if you want a Youtube video about it. I am sure the black helicopters are circling this guy and he has a bomb shelter…. Bear in mind, I am on his side of the fence. I believe the federal government is corrupt and they have their interest way more than an our interest at heart. What does this directive (by an only assistant secretary) give the president or a governor that doesn’t already exist? So let’s play our favorite game, what if. What if, as the guy implies, the government (Democrats) are preparing to steal the election and they are preparing for a possible armed backlash. Basically, the government knows it will start massive protests and potentially an attempt to overthrow the government. Okay. The guy in the video even agrees that it is to assist the local or state police. If the local or state police need help, the governor already has a 100% authority to send in the National Guard, which is any effect is the United States Army, but who have not been federalized. Remember that many of the troops who fought in the Gulf Wars were National Guard units. So there has almost always been (for over 100 years) the authority to bring in federal troops but under the direction of the governor. In fact the Washington DC police chief testified under oath that he contacted Nancy Pelosi three times to get the DC National Guard in place before January 6, 2021. So they could have had federally trained troops on the ground but did not however that is a different topic. Remember that the Kent State massacre where four students were killed by the National Guard, was the Ohio state governor calling in the military to quell the riots. It wasn’t the federal government. Less than two weeks later the same thing happened at Jackson State College (now University) where two Black students were killed and 12 injured but by the state police (much lesser known than Kent State, almost certainly due to race). Again it was not the federal government but the state which brought in manpower and they again could have had the governor call in the National Guard. So assuming that this is an attempt to justify the use of force by the military, that already exists. This guy and others might be thinking of the Posse Comitatus Act which prohibits the use of the US military as state civilian law enforcement. That is why the National Guard is under state control and they CAN act as civilian state law enforcement. The Posse Comalitatus Act does NOT however prevent the use of the US military in open rebellion. Basically if a civil war or open rebellion starts, the US military has the authority to be used by the president. He/she doesn’t need the permission of a directive by the Assistant Secretary of Defense. That is ludicrous. So if the governor can already call in federal troops under the name of the National Guard and the president already has the authority to use the military to put down an open rebellion… what does this DoD directive by an assistant secretary authorize that doesn’t already exist? Anyway, here is the short video of at least one person who may be referred to as a source.

Good call on the interesting and entertaining game.

Whatever game plan Nederland had to put pressure on their quarterback, it worked.

“The report of my death was an exaggeration.” Mark Twain (Nederland Bulldogs)

!!score:35/43/f

GAME

GAME

Sack for -8 Incomplete

Squib kickoff return to Lake Creek 25 0:39

0:45

!!score:35/43/4

Nederland fg attempt is good

Timeout Nederland at 0:49

4-4 1:10 counting

I think last timeout for Lake Creek at 1:35. 3-8

Timeout Lake Creek at 1:41. 2-8

Nederland at Lake Creek 25 1:45

INTERCEPTED

Kickoff return to Lake Creek 38

2 points no good !!score:35/40/4

2:04 Nederland going for 2, timeout

56 yard Thomas run

Touchdown Nederland

Touchback Nederland ball at 25

!!score:35/34/4