Not everyone that’s willing to make a little easy money selling weed to their peers is willing to deal with the hassle of selling cocaine to hardcore drug users. Although I haven’t yet looked at the numbers I’m willing to bet the crime rate went down at least a little after alcohol was legalized up until the cocaine era of the 80s. And yes the Mob still exist but they’re legit now.
I guess technically you do have to label the young “unidentified” boy a criminal and a muderer too I guess but I don’t think it’s fair to define him by his tragic mistake. The kid did not intentionally set out to kill the victim. The victim attempted to run to avoid paying the “unidentified” kid for the drug exchange.. The “unidentified criminal”, then chased him down and attempted to tussle with him. I’m guessing this was probably an attempt to wrestle the money from him or something. The victim, who is said to have been on the wrestling team at the school, is said to have won the wrestling match and may have slammed the “unidentified criminal’s” head on the ground a few times. The “unidentified” kid then grabbed a sharp object and stabbed him. This case would probably be self defense in most people’s eyes as well as the court of law if an illegal substance were not involved. The judge might have realized this fact and also the fact that weed is legal in half the states and felt a little sympathy for the “unidentified” criminal. I’ve heard many stories like this and it normally doesn’t go well for the person in the “unidentified” criminals shoes? I wonder why the kid remains unidentified?