Englebert

The first sentence is an outright lie. You regularly call Trump a liar, but it is apparent you don't even know what a lie is. The health care providers had already risen their rates before Trump ever made the decision to stop bailouts. But your article is trying to say that this is the reason for their increase in rates. How can anybody with at least two functioning brain cells fall for this crap. Your Liberal gods are in full control of your brain, and for some reason you are attempting to spread the disease. No thanks.

Accepting different opinions is fine. Accepting opinions that are contrary to a colossus of evidence is ridiculous. If I said "my opinion is 1+1=3", you don't have to "accept" that ridiculous statement. And would you like to discuss which group will not accept other's opinions? You try to claim that both sides are guilty...which is like saying "well Team A won by a score of 126-7, which is proof that both teams can score". And speaking of facts...do the Liberals even know of that term? Isn't their mantra "everything is relative"?

I've asked you at least three times already to give evidence of your contentious narrative that Trump will get rid of the pre-existing conditions clause. You have ran like a frightened teenager each time. It is now evident to everyone that you are a complete and unadulterated liar...and I don't throw that term around lightly like you do. Many "lies" are misinterpretations or statements that go unfulfilled because of changing circumstances. You are just a liar. And what's worse is you actually try to admonish Trump for lying when you are the poster boy for this despicable behavior...along with your godlike idols Bill "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" Clinton, Hillary "the attack was caused by a video" Clinton and Hussein "you can keep your doctor" Obama. But keep posting your pathetic and nonsensical lies...everyone needs a laugh now and again. It's too bad you can't join in on the laughter, considering we are laughing at you. You might want to find an open mike comedy club...you could probably attain that 1% status by just using the same material you use on here.

Would you like to defend some of these Trump "lies" your Liberal gods have installed in your head. It is a simple and plain fact Obama lied about the IRS corruption...and you have the nerve to try dismiss this FACT with a childish "but he did it too" article...which is in itself full of lies. And if you don't want to debate the points in your linked article (and I'm positive you won't), at least admit your Liberal gods are making you look more foolish with each post. Maybe you should add a simple signature line to your posts that reads "tobie got played".

I didn't even have to open the link to know what you were referring to. One of my all-time favorite movies.

I agree with you...yeah. I don't think all rich people are out to purposely screw the middle class. I think it is more of a case of having to screw somebody to get their money, and screwing the poor creates too much bad publicity. So the middle class is the obvious choice. I'm curious to see if Trump will go after Hillary. He did say "she has been through enough", but she has also still been hammering him publically...and we know how vindictive Trump can be. He will not sit back and let her bash him. If there ever was a time for someone to keep their mouth shut, it is that time for Hillary. I hope she keeps mouthing.

What atrocity are you referring to? And how many accusations have you made in which you have no backing evidence? This fodder is older than your "grab um" strategy. And do you know the informal definition of insanity...trying something over and over while expecting a different outcome. It is clear that not one person on here has fell for your outrageous and defenseless contentions.

Do you think we expected a more logical response? The intelligence level is on full display.

I'll ask you for the third time...can you provide evidence that Trump wants to eliminate the pre-existing conditions clause in any healthcare proposal? Why won't you answer a simple question to the narrative you keep pushing?

I think the searing bile of hate you hold inside has destroyed your last brain cell. And you are the only one blowing crap around here. Keep calling me a racist with no supporting evidence. You willingly (but probably unknowingly) expose your hate and stunted intellectual growth for all the world to see. The third graders have turned from laughter to sorrow. It is shameful and pitiful to see a grown man act more immature than they are.

If you believe in lagging indicators, then you must give full credit to Bush for getting Bin Laden, but we already know what your hypocritical stance will be. Do you realize that the Republicans controlled Congress at the end of Bill and Obama's final terms? So shouldn't you be thanking the Republican controlled Congress for these numbers? If not, please give some policy examples from both presidents that lead you to believe both are responsible for these unemployment numbers. I think I just heard the sonic boom resulting from you running from these questions.

You are going to Liberal prison for referring to a female professor using the male term. I'll be right there with you because I just used the newly outlawed gender terms. We better both keep our mouths shut because anything we say will be interpreted as racist.

I guess we should take down the statues of these men. Can you show me where one is located? And do you really wonder why nobody takes you serious? I'm sure your reasoning is mired in racism.

Did you mean to say "Good thing our founding fathers were wise enough to setup an election process whereby large urban population centers cannot control the rest of the country". I'm sure that's what you meant to say, unless you are totally naive and/or willfully ignorant of our existing election system. Who do you think should be in the World Series, Astros or Yankees? To not be a hypocrite you must say the Yankees because they outscored the Astros 22-20 in the ALCS. It shouldn't matter that the Astros won 4-3 in games. Maybe those folks in New York should be rioting and screaming racism, since the term racism doesn't mean anything anymore due to overuse or misuse.

Bill Clinton should be president king of Fox by your reasoning, and I bet you are admiring your poster of him as you admonish O'Reilly.

If you are curious about who loves you more, your dog or your wife, lock them both in the trunk of your car for two hours. When you open it up, guess which one will be glad to see you. (Can't remember author).

I think Jimmy Carter is the Rudy Ruettiger of presidents. The heart and will was in abundance, but was severely lacking on ability. One of the finest men to grace this Earth, one of the worst presidents to ever occupy the seat.

How about we go to a Dallas Cowboys practice and run this same experiment. Line all of the players up, tell, them to race for money, then ask, "If you went to a football camp when you were 5 years old, take two steps forward. If your dad brought you to see NFL games when you were a kid take two steps forward. If your dad was able to seat you in the skyboxes to witness a pro game, take two steps forward. If your dad paid for private football lessons when you were 10 years old, take two steps forward. If your dad introduced you to legendary coaches and retired NFL players, take two steps forward. If your dad used his influence to secure a starting position on your high school football team, take two steps forward. If your dad made a donation to your "college of (his) choice" to secure a position on the football team, take two steps forward. How would you react to this thought provoking experiment? Would you be surprised by forthcoming comments?

I have absolutely no doubt what-so-ever that this "experiment" was setup to focus entirely on race. I'm pretty flabbergasted that this "setup" was staged to evoke a response that you seem surprised at. I refrained from stating it earlier, but this is just another example of propaganda to elicit White guilt. To say it focuses on anything else is pretty naive in my opinion. This is just one in a long line of an increasingly long list of patronizing setups. :disappointedeyes.

I found it to be devoid of any significance or value. For example, who gets to determine how much a "two parent" family is worth? Is it really worth 2 steps, maybe 6 inches, or maybe 20 steps? Same applies for all of the questions? There is no doubt that socioeconomic status plays a big part, but the amount and significances of each factor is not really known. This example places a fixed and finite measurement to factors that have no measurability...therefore, is just an exercise in propaganda. If I would have submitted this "experiment" in college I would have undoubtedly received an "F". I'm not so sure now. A Liberal college would probably give me an "A" although the exercise is lacking any scientific standards rendering any conclusions worthless.

That's some very selective criteria. Do you think Michael Jordan's kids would have won that race if they were in it? (I'm just using him as an example, I don't even know if he has kids.)

So Trump made the statement "Wouldn't you love to see..." and you interpret that as Trump demanding the owners fire the players? I can see Big Girl regurgitating that Liberal nonsense, but didn't think anybody else could possibly fail that miserably on a simple statement. Hate can be a helluva... Maybe Trump engaged Obama first to make sure Obama wasn't sporting his manhood. Trump was just protecting his wife. And I would much rather have a President that does things that are mis-interpreted as "bad" or egotistical than have a President that lies directly to the face of the American people and the Liberal media says and does nothing. The blatant hypocrisy is on full display.

When did Trump tell/instruct/demand/order the owners to fire the players that kneel? I know the Liberal media has tried to portray that as fact. I assumed they failed miserably in this attempt, but now I'm not so sure.

My post was really a "well, duh" for Big Girl who refuses to accept this simple concept. It is clear to practically everybody but her. Can you give some examples of some of Trump's actions you feel deserves impeachment? And please contrast these behaviors with the "rules of respect" at your current job.

Are you actually posting links glamorizing Bill Maher...you know, the guy that disrespects woman. Remind me again what he called Sarah Palin. I thought you abhor people that disrespects women. Oh I forget, it depends on the political affiliation.