Englebert

If you believe in science then you necessarily have to reject the tenants of global warming...which is not based in science. If you believe in science, then you would know that. Scientific methodology has been completely abandoned by these "climate scientists". Where are these massive fires, floods, droughts, and record high temperatures you claim? You can find more severe weather during anytime in just the last hundred years. Why do you conveniently leave out the fact that ice has dramatically increased in large areas? Why did you fail to mention that hurricanes were way more severe in the 1880s, 1930s, 1940s, and 1960s than today. Did you conveniently forget because these things negate your theories? Why do you totally discount solar flares, solar cool spots, Sun hibernation, space wind, Earth's fluctuating axis tilt, Earth's fluctuating orbital path, the Moon's fluctuating gravitation pull, volcano effects, weather patterns that are just being discovered, and on and on and on and on? No...we can ignore the more prevalent culprits and just blame Man...with zero backing evidence. Didn't you mention "idiotic thinking"? I find it extremely funny that your job was to backup your statement that our weather is becoming more severe, and you offer up an article debating how many scientists agree with you. Are you having trouble finding those accurate climate modules you claim exist? I bet you are...and I know why!

I'm calling you out for your lack of credentials. Prove your assertions...just so we can laugh at your pathetic "ole college try". It is painfully obvious you did not find a single accurate climate module, considering you did not post any refuting evidence. Your attempts at "shooting the messenger" is just so blase. You claim the "weather" is becoming more extreme. Please, oh please, try to backup this asinine claim with fact. A quick Duck Duck Go (even Google or Bing) search combined with a very minute amount of reading will readily show that Earth is currently in a very calm geological state. But the lazy sheeple that worship the Liberal agenda will swear by their political lords by stupidly parroting the fascist talking points that Earth is in dire peril if we humans do not succumb to their overarching attempts to gain total power. So in essence...let's see your evidence that proves your statement. How's that for credentials...like that is necessary to laugh at someone that is a climate poser. Yes...old school...POSER. If the shoe fits... (you might have to learn that one considering how gullible you have shown yourself to be.) Everyone who subscribes to the Gateway Pundit is laughing at your attempt to lord over them by displaying your complete stupidity on the topic. I've learned that when dealing with climate nazis, you not only have to call them out by questioning their theories, but you have to play their own game of insults to get a response. So consider yourself called out and insulted. Now get to work on that evidence so we can add a comedy routine to this forum. But I will predict, like always, you will be found in a fetal position in a corner of the room peeing on yourself when you realize you can't fulfill your basic obligations of proving your own assertions. (Wow, the climate just might start fluctuating wildly after all that hot air. But I did offset it by choosing not to fly around the world on a private jet to attend any of the seven or eight climate summits.) Now, we can move this conversation to a civil fact-based discussion in which you will be thoroughly humiliated by your position. Or we can continue with a factless, childish diatribe of insults. I bet I know which you will have to choose.

That is about a big of a lie that is humanly possible. First of all, every single climate model that has been construed in the last 30 years has been wildly wrong. Every single one. Not most. All have been wrong...by a long shot! Second, the climate is not swinging wildly both ways. That is "idiotic thinking" based on feelings...not science. And to add more insult to your post, not one single climate module even predicted what you claim. All have the Earth's temperature warming, not swinging both ways. Maybe you need to do more research instead of throwing out insults about matters of which you are clueless.

Cuero 44 HF 33 Final

HF has 9 unsportsmanlike penalties in the last 2 minutes.

Cuero 44-27 3:29 4th

Cuero 37-27 11:48 4th

Cuero 37 HF 21 End of 3rd

Cuero 37-21 3:56 3rd

Cuero 34 HF 21 Halftime

Cuero 34-21 0:21 2nd

Cuero 34-14 6:46 2nd

Cuero 34-7 7:04 2nd

Cuero 27-7 9:13 2nd

Cuero 20-7 End of 1st

Cuero 20-7 1:25 1st

Cuero 14-7 1:58 1st

Tied 7-7 9:52 1st

HF 7-0 10:04 1st

HF 57 Royal 7 Final

HF 57 BR 7 End of 3rd

HF 57-7 3:26 3rd

HF 49-7 9:17 3rd

Still halftime. 2 minutes to kickoff.

Hamshire-Fannett 42 Brookshire Royal 7 Halftime