Englebert

Everyone on this board has seen your interpretation skills (or lack of). Everyone on this board has seen you get caught in lie after lie. And now you accuse me of lying (with zero proof). You are a very funny little man. How come your fellow Trump haters turned their back on you and your flawed interpretation? Is it because even they can't stoop to that level of stupidity? Normally, you would be a waste of time. But I kinda enjoy pushing you to see how low you will go. It's getting really boring since you can't come up with anything original, but I'm going to keep pushing you to do better.

You are the one that can't interpret Trump's obvious statements. It's no wonder you have trouble with UT alum's 5th grade reading level sentence. This is fun. Bring on some more one liners that only a simpleton could enjoy. I know I'm embarrassed. How about you?

Please explain your definition of "groomer". I want to know if you are actually accusing people of pedophilia, or if you are using the traditional definition of grooming horses or dogs (which would make no sense in this context),

Your comedy routine is getting better, but you have a long way to go before you even walk behind CardinalBacker.

Well there you go. You say "my idol". Fabulous lie number one. Well, not one, there are too many to count. Please explain those lies you accuse Trump of spinning. You fell for "your idol" CardinalBacker telling you to believe Trump said he would end elections if you vote for him. You chalk that up as a lie by Trump, when it was really a lie by CardinalBacker. He is making you look foolish.

That is a lot of explaining for a sentence that didn't even come close to your explanation. I can see now why you had a whole lot of trouble interpreting what Trump said. Thanks for clarifying what was not said. I only answered this post so I can get attention. Why did you answer my post? This is comical.

1. I don't think too many people are trying to be productive when dealing with CardinalBacker. I know I'm not. That would be a futile endeavor. 2. Thank you for your answer.

What does that even mean? Please explain.

Do you think he is "doing his best to convince other sane Rs" by telling fabulous lies, calling Rs, Trump supporters, Magas, and anybody else who doesn't agree with him all kinds of hateful names, etc. Is this the rationale you can respect?

When you know that is what some people are doing, then sometimes it's fun to join in on the nonsensical rhetoric don't you think? Back to the topic. Do you think Trump was saying he would actually get rid of the election process if elected?

Is is clear now why I don't take any of CardinalBacker's post serious enough to actually answer? The lies are so numerous I just don't feel like wasting time reading them.

Let's get you on record also. I'll pose the same question to you as I did to UT alum. Please answer yes or no, then you can optionally add commentary. Do you think Trump was saying he would get rid of the election process if elected?

Who are you talking to? And what does "in your feelings" mean?

Can you please come up with some new material. This reeks of desperation...and you know it.

You are a funny little man. And a childish one. Does that make you a funny little boy? You are so smart...you tell me. Edit: I just realized who I'm talking to. I have a feeling you will interpret my "you are so smart" statement as literal. You are very bad at interpreting statements...as this whole thread has shown.

Tell us again how Trump is a threat to democracy? You have witnessed in plain site a political party that created a hoax with the help of government agencies and the media in an effort to damage their political rival. You have witnessed a party that went after a political rival's administration personnel, jailing and bankrupting them. You have witnessed a party that went directly after their political rival, trying to jail and bankrupt him. You have witnessed top level government agents target social media to suppress information about their political rival. And you say Trump is a threat to democracy? How sad.

You can't even get your fellow Trump hater to believe your garbage. A person with severe TDS is asked to have your back, and even he won't go so far as to agree with you. You think your charade is working, but you can't even convince your base. How funny. It appears that your fellow haters don't worship you like you thought.

I'm now starting to think I will sit out this election. After carefully listening to your hate-filled tirades full of lies, I'm now thinking, "yes, I would like to follow that man's advice. As unhinged as it is, I'll suppress my common sense (and laughter) and bow to his greatness. By not voting, I will contribute to the reality of a horrible candidate being elected. But now I don't care. I will follow the little man full of hate." You actually tried to convince UT alum that your "process" was working. The absurdity knows no bounds. Keep trying. You almost had us. LOL.

Thanks for admitting you are not capable of interpreting Trumps statement. It was easy to decipher for anyone not ate up with TDS. Why do you feel the need to jump into a conversation in which you admit you are not capable of contributing? That's the burning question now. Just joking. Your rationale for embarrassing yourself is of no concern.

How to argue with a person that shamelessly lies. Nobody can be this stupid. Let's get you on record. Do you sincerely believe all of the garbage you spew about Trump, or is this some kind of ruse that you will evidently admit to? State your intentions now, so you can't come back later and try to claim you were "joking".

Do you think your fellow Trump hater will admit for all the world to see that he agrees with your outlandish premise that Trump is wanting to get rid of the election process? He has a decision to make. How embarrassing for him if he agrees with you. How embarrassing for you if you can't even convince your fellow comrade to have your back.

How are you not totally embarrassed with yourself for making such a childish statement? Are you desperate for attention like CardinalBacker?

If you don't know what he was saying, why did you say it wasn't out of context? One of the requirements of making that judgmental statement is that you must understand the statement to judge the context. So basically you just contradicted yourself, akin to what you accused CardinalBacker of doing. Let's see if we can get you on record here. Please give a yes or no answer. You can then follow with commentary if you like. Do you think Trump was saying he would get rid of the election process if elected?

His remarks have been misinterpreted many times by people who are not qualified to attempt the endeavor, and many times purposely by people who have an agenda. This thread is the perfect example. It is amazing how many people fall for the lies. Just to be clear, do you actually think Trump was saying that he would get rid of the election process? Do you actually believe that? You can admit it if you believe it.

He has no sense of shame, so he won't care. How someone can embarrass themselves so much is beyond comprehension.