Englebert

Grid? Seriously? Man are you a Liberal sheeple. Would you prefer we spend trillions of dollars on a grid that that might not go down once in 25 years? Yes, you are a sheeple so we know the answer. Please give your intelligent resolution to your delusional "problems". States education? What complaints do you have with Abbot on this? (Hint: the Liberal sheeple answers will only draw laughter...so that leaves you with nothing...but let's see what you come up with.) States Healthcare? Again, see above. What do you propose? Please, please answer so we can laugh at your Liberal response.

I take your blatant omission of answering the pertinent question as a "guilty as charged" verdict. Don't worry, it was predictable. What "right" did anyone take? Is contraception a right? Should we have a debate or just turn a blind eye so the low information voter will not be offended? Is gay marriage a right? See above. Can you answer the question on whether or not you described the "D's" as low information voters? Is it too hard for you to admit because you feel a "brotherhood" with your own kind?

This is an accurate but very, very sad evaluation of the "D's". How can a person switch their vote based on a Supreme Court decision that puts power back into the hands of the people and is grounded in Constitutional law. Low information voter is the only logical conclusion. Agree?

There is a fine line that distinguishes who gets to make law by legislative process or by executive fiat. The ultimate problem is that nobody can define and establish that line. TVC gave some great examples of legal fiat. Examples of overreach would be the something like the Beaumont mayor decreeing that (s)he doesn't want 14 and 15 year old kids in high school, so all Beaumont schools must keep these students in Junior High. Or maybe the Parks and Wildlife Department decreeing that JetSkis are no longer allowed on any Texas waterways. Or that the police chief decrees motorcycles are too dangerous and therefore outlawed in Beaumont. There is a line, but who gets to decide? This issue will never be settled. A case by case ruling with very limited precedence is all we should be able to hope for. I frankly don't see this case as blockbuster. Very important, but not enduring precedence.

Smart move. Just like InMagaWeTrust would have done. See you on the next topic.

I take that as "I'm a clown that can't debate without exposing myself as the clown I wish to be, so I just call others clowns". Did that accurately describe your position? It's funny you would run from such a simple task. How hard is it to list your preferred positions that a president should espouse? I guess you can hear that gutter calling you. It might be wise for you to run instead of embarrassing yourself again. And just like InMagaWeTrust, you will run then show up on another topic spewing your same garbage. I will call you out, and you will run again. On the off chance you try to debate, you will immediately go straight to the gutter, which I will begrudgingly follow...embarrassing both of us. The exact same thing as InMagaWeTrust. If you are not him, you definitely could be his twin brother. Ooops, I should have broken this into multiple posts. You previously admitted in our last "debate" (LOL) that you didn't have the ability to follow a post with multiple sentences. You whined about how the "big" words and the length was just too much for you. (It was hard to believe your sudden revelation of honesty after all of the lies.)

What above response? The Liberal lies you listed? You can't be serious. List the characteristics and policy positions you would have wanted Trump to espouse instead of the actions he engaged in that you find repulsive. It's very simple. You seem to fancy yourself as superior to him (and everyone on this board), so this should be a simple task. Keep is classy and I will reciprocate. You go in the gutter and I will follow you...just like last time. What are you scared of? (LOL, that was rhetorical, everyone knows what you are scared of.) Even you know you don't have the ability to debate and must resort to derogatory gutter-snipe in a lame attempt to deflect from having to defend your indefensible positions. Let's see how far you get before your immaturity leaks out.

Now that you have regurgitated the Liberal lies (ones you were conned into believing), see if you can list real reasons to hate Trump? (I find it comical that you don't realize how childish you sound trying to make fun of people's names. "Conald"? Are you really stooping to that? Direct evidence you have nothing but childish antics. You are a hero to 3rd graders, while 5th graders just put the "L" handsign on their forehead. 6th graders just ignore such immaturity. Thanks for again showing your level of debating skills.) Since you have proven over and over you can't come up with anything to back your allegations, let's switch to a much simpler task...one even you should be able to complete. Please list the characteristics and policy positions you want to see in a president. Since you can't say what Trump did wrong, let's see what you think he should have done (according to you). This should be amusing.

Yes it does. That's why I posted this. I wasn't counting, but I passed around 20 police vehicles that were in pursuit. They were somewhat spread out over a few miles. I just saw this on 12newsnow.com: 2 arrested after car chase ends in Jefferson County | 12newsnow.com

I passed a truck with a shredded tire going east on Hwy 365 at around 4:00pm. The truck had just passed over the new bridge under construction over Hillebrandt Bayou...headed towards Port Acres/Nederland/Port Neches. The truck had 6 police vehicles right on his tail. All had their lights flashing. After passing the truck and police, I passed 10 to 15 more cop cars/trucks (all with lights flashing) speeding towards the truck. Does anybody know any details about this police chase? I'm sure the media will release some information shortly, just curious if anybody already has information.

I was the first person to respond to your topic. I simply asked a simple question that even the most simplest of mindsets could answer in simple fashion. Simple right? We are now on page 9, and you have yet to answer the first simple question. I know why you have not attempted to answer. Everyone on this board knows why you haven't attempted an answer. My question now is just as simple as the first simple question. Are you intentionally trying to embarrass yourself? Are you parading as a simpleton? If so, why? If not, explain your rationale for this post. If you refuse to answer, should we mock you unmercifully until you do? Or should we allow you to hide in shame? I guess the pertinent question is...how much abuse and obfuscation should sane people have to endure from people that insult other's intelligence...then run and hide? Is it fair to rationale people to have to endure your ridicule with zero accountability? Do you feel any obligation to explain yourself? Can I make similar accusations without a compelling societal obligation of evidence and debate? So again, why do you feel you have a right to insult every rational person on this board without repercussions? I'm just having fun. Nine pages ago we knew the crux of this topic. Everyone knows the future of this topic. I will never understand the rationale for some to act out in this fashion. I'm confident a few on here know this response was not aimed strictly at Badsanta. Hopefully Badsanta and the others will come clean with the admission that they were just playing devil's advocate, or playing the fool, or stirring the pot to elicit rationale responses. My hope is backed with no confidence.

I have a few questions for you. How many White people said that you will not own other people in my state? How many White people came together in unity to pass legislation to end the practice? Answer this question before you preach from your high hobby horse. How many White people have given the ultimate sacrifice to free slaves? How many White people have fought to their last breath to end the oppression? We actually have a name for that battle. Do you know what it is? Name that war before you preach from your high hobby horse. How many White people have sacrificed their own advancement and that of their children to end inequality? We have a name for it. Martin Luther King was prominent, but how much success would he have had without the prominence of White people? Name that movement before you preach from your high hobby horse. How many laws have been passed by the majority (White people) to give the oppressed trillions of dollars? Answer this before you preach from your high hobby horse. How many rulings by courts, including the Supreme Court of the United States, have permitted/stayed the practice of blatant discriminatory practices to benefit the Black man? Answer this question before you preach from your high hobby horse. How many trillions of hard earned tax dollars has the Government (Fed, State, Local) confiscated from mostly the majority (White taxpayers) to be unfairly redistributed to the Black man in the name of equality? Answer this before you preach from your high hobby horse. How many White owned corporations have taken their profits to contribute to "urban" (you know the translation) causes in the name of equality? Answer this before you preach from your high hobby horse. I purposely worded some of these questions in the form of (perceived) anger to watch you attempt to formulate a personal attack in deflection to the criticism. I would love to see how someone espousing this pathetic mindset can defend himself when faced with reality, but you will not respond. You can't respond. You actually tried to use your parents name to take a cheap shot at me in a different thread. I thought that was as pathetic as it gets...until this post.

Yeah, whatever. Me saying I'm the King of England doesn't make it true. Now, I'm done (until you respond again).

You are now back in the lead for the most illogical reading of a situation. I mean, this one was just golden. I find it practically impossible for anyone with at least three functioning brain cells to come up with that analysis. Good job. And you get awarded bonus points for attempting a mundane swipe at screen names. And you get awarded more bonus points for attempting this ploy over and over after it has failed to garner any attention. That is true Liberal logic at it's lowest. When hardcore Liberals say your post is weak, you know you've got a winner in your quest for the championship. Congratulations. 45thSucks has his work cut out for him now. Glad to see y'all are both back on here. You two seem to feed off each other. That means more entertainment for the board.

Now you're cooking. Incessant whining about your ability to succeed followed by a personal attack that is unsubstantiated and basically pulled out of thin air. That is as stupid as it gets. Good job. The natural Liberal in you is back, although your brethren might not be happy with your admission that you actually work for a living. Your fellow Liberals would also be furious at you for saying you don't rely on government, but lucky for you they recognized the fact that you pulled that out of the same place you pulled your other contentions. You have redeemed yourself and leapt back into a tie with InMagaMan (who seems to have left the board right before you reappeared). Way to give the people what they want.

You still have a long way to go to catch InMagaMan. Your tenacity coupled with a lack of originality is commendable, but this is just too contrived. You need to rely on your natural ability to humiliate yourself in order to get the big points.

Nice try, but you will have to do better than this. InMagaTrust still has a big lead. I have faith in you coming back though.

Wow. Doubling down on the stupidity after taking the lead. You know you are gambling doing this. You might have said something that contained a slight bit of intelligence. But being the consummate professional you are, I guess you knew you could rely on your natural ability to refrain from any sensible nuggets from infiltrating your post. You have now moved further in the lead for "Dumbest Poster on the Board". 45thMan better respond with a very, very stupid post because your lead is now almost insurmountable.

You are now back in the lead. Just like a good little Liberal, you take personal humiliation and convert it to an unfounded and hilarious form of superiority. Your faux empathy ploy far surpasses UTAlum's fake contrition. You do realize everyone is laughing at your lame attempt of compassion. This post is so hideously stupid that you have zoomed past 45thMan. Don't get complacent though, I have a feeling he is plotting something even more stupid than this post.

Again, so much vigor spent on getting that trophy. Y'all both sound desperate but are highly energetic. The level of stupidity has increased exponentially. InMagaWeTrust, you will be docked for the use of conspiracy theories. Liberal ideology, as flawed as it is, only allows for Conservatives to espouse these. Huge mistake. But basing a theory on complete nonsense is brilliantly stupid, which should lessen the amount of rescinded points. So the mistake is not as bad as it seems. 45thSucks, you get bonus points for conforming to Liberal ideology in declaring more than two genders. Of course, the Gay community might be upset with your demeaning use of "or something", but they will forgive you because...well, you know. As it stands now, 45thSucks has taken a slight lead. The crown is in sight, but InMagaWeTrust won't go down without a fight. Let's continue.

Uh-oh. Gay jokes. Really. That is not very Liberal of you. You will have to be docked major points for this. But since you were wearing your obedience chin diaper when posting, the punishment will be waived. You should get bonus points for incomprehensibility, but just feel lucky you don't get completely ostracized for debasing the Gay community. I'm guessing the Gay community will give you a pass due to the readily identifiability of your intelligence level. (That means they will feel sorry for you and give you a pass.) Thanks to Liberal ideology, as flawed as it is, you are still tied. I know y'all will keep trying.

Both great attempts of showing ignorance. We might have to call in an expert judge to evaluate which one is now in the lead. You both are excelling at childishness, lameness, and downright toilet humor. I love it. You are both trying so hard for that coveted crown. Visions of "Rudy" are dancing in my head. The fervor and tenacity of which you two compete to fail is just astonishing. I'm going to call a tie. Let's see which of you can next embarrass himself more for that cherished lead. On your mark! Get set! Go!

Are you going to post the articles on the shootings or just whine about someone else not posting the articles? It's a very, very simple task, but it seems you don't have the ability to pull it off. Don't worry, I'm guessing if you cry loud and long enough, someone will do the simple task of posting these readily accessible articles just for you.

Wow. That was a fair attempt to get back in the lead. But you are gonna have to do better. 4thSucks is still nudging you into second place. But I know you will keep trying. Maybe if you try to explain why you busted out laughing, then that attempt will probably propel you back into the lead. Let's see. Sorry I took so long to respond to your post. I have a slight cold so my nose is not as sensitive to garbage right now.

Don't you think you deserve it. I like and respect that you took ownership of your mistake, and gave a half-hearted (almost faux) apology. But I feel your overall perspective, that is hatred for some, hasn't change. That deserves zero respect. In fact, I believe that calls for ridicule. You haven't learned from you mistake. You got caught then offered false contrition in an attempt to save face. I could be wrong, but I doubt it. And you hate me because I can and will call you out on your garbage. That almost warms my heart.