Reagan

This is how you take care of frivolous lawsuits! [Hidden Content]

Gonna be bad for ol' Beto! [Hidden Content]

[Hidden Content]

Go Beto, Go Beto! [Hidden Content] And then you have this! [Hidden Content]

WHY??!! If this was a dramatic experience for her and she is 1,000% sure it was Kavanaugh, then it is her duty to make sure this serial rapist and sexual assaulter is brought to justice! If he was 1,000% guilty before his confirmation, he's 1,000% guilty after. What about the other two women that accused him?? Got quite all of a sudden. If Kavanaugh was/is a sexual predator, there should be more women coming out and accusing him. Because, really, if he was a predator, then I'm sure he would have been involved with more than 3 women. And, even back then, since he was a conservatuive, I guess he felt sorry for the conservative women. He left them alone. Because like I've stated before -- it was only radical liberal women that he supposedly assaulted. Sneaky little rascal! [Hidden Content]

[Hidden Content]

[Hidden Content] On a side note: Did Christine Balsey Ford play Garth on Wayne's World?

True! People keep taking about abortion being law. Can anyone tell me when this law was created by the legislature?

Paid outrage! [Hidden Content]

I told you!! [Hidden Content]

We won't here any more about the these 3 women! Let's watch and see.

Hummm!! [Hidden Content]

Again -- what's in the envelope? [Hidden Content]

This is what the political left has come to. This is the face of the left! [Hidden Content]

I saw a montage of the various left-wing news organizations and all basically said the same thing: He threw ice in a bar. I wonder if they even read their talking points before they spew their venom?

Thanks!

[Hidden Content]

From the article: "Ford’s lawyers tell Grassley that they will provide her therapy notes, polygraph data to the FBI once she is interviewed (that hasn’t happened as of now). Worth remembering that for all the talk of the FBI’s supplemental background check, the Constitution confers authority to advise and consent on the Senate and only the Senate. Refusal to provide info to the committee is striking. She had over two weeks to provide them to the Senate which, in this case, has more investigative jurisdiction than the FBI does. She could have presented them during open testimony as corroborating evidence. She didn’t. Grassley response: “It’s disappointing that Dr. Ford’s attorneys were willing to share evidence with The Washington Post many weeks ago but to this day refuse to share the same evidence, which Dr. Ford relied on in her testimony, with the Senate.” This is a game. It’s time to end it." In other words, SHE PUT CONDITIONS on providing evidence that Ford herself claimed would help prove her own case. What possible reason could there be for that, UNLESS the therapy notes contradicted her story or were in fact helpful to prove Kavanaugh’s innocence? [Hidden Content]