westend1

Not trying to change your mind. Just showing you that your arguments are flawed.. Your mind is certainly made up. I agree with you there.

Sure, over hundreds of millions of years. think about how long that is. Whole mountains dissolve and cover foliage hundreds, if not thousands of feet deep over 100 million years. Surely you are not comparing that to something that is happening over a 50 year period.

So I gather that you believe that accumulation on top of the plane necessarily means that the ice pack is deeper.(or higher) Do you know if 18 ft of ice over 75 yrs is enough to offset glaciation? The pics of major glaciers seem to tell a different story.

That's it? No pics, no comparison to the rest of the world? How old is that stuff?

I am interested in seeing your source for glacial growth. Every pic I have seen shows glaciers are shrinking.

LOL! Every post you make is an interpretation of an old document. If you want to see it as "he revealed it" you better learn to speak another language.

Who burned it?

I don't think God even spoke English. Those are not his words.

[Hidden Content] I don't know but here is what I found in about 2 seconds.

The two Republicans are correct that military forces were reduced significantly under Clinton. The active-duty military totaled 1.8-million at the start of his presidency in 1993 and declined to 1.4-million in 2000. They are also correct that the naval fleet shrank dramatically. The Navy had 454 ships in 1993, but as vessels were retired and not replaced, the fleet was down to 341 by 2000. But they are selectively choosing numbers that make it appear that the military cuts were Clinton's alone. In fact, the cuts were prompted by the end of the Cold War during the presidency of President George H.W. Bush, a Republican. During Bush's presidency, he and Congress agreed to a sharp drop in military personnel. Active-duty military declined from 2.2-million to 1.8-million. Total defense forces also shrank, from 3.3-million to 2.9-million. The Republicans are trying to portray Clinton and the Democrats as weak on defense and to make the peace dividend look like a partisan effort. But contrary to the Republicans' claims, the post-Cold War shrinkage of the U.S. military was very much a bipartisan effort. It began under a Republican president and a Democratic Congress and continued under a Democratic president and a Republican Congress.

So, who did you vote for? ObamnaCare or Romneycare?

Not really. He said savings could be "up to" $2500, which is different from the quote. That aside, he had an economic adviser who provided the numbers. That adviser says that the $2500 was not a savings on insurance premiums, it was total cost, which includes out of pocket and savings from preventative care. Now, I don't think anybody ever believed that premiums would go down with the additional coverage provided by ObamaCare, but his opponent thought it was a good idea. And, he was supposedly a good businessman.

Is this satire? There have been enough baseless allegations against those two to choke a horse. I can show you Enquirer examples if you like.

We already leave the social part to the states, unless they try and take away some constitutionally protected right. We might disagree on what is protected, but the Supreme Court resolves those issues.

Nah. We need to move right fiscally and left socially. Not sure why this is so hard to understand..

No need to apologize. This board hasn't been on an "intellectual level" for several years.

LOL. You are right about Trump! No winning that mud wrestling match.

Now this is a beaten man. He is willing to fight it harder than you are. I am not saying you are right or wrong, just beaten.

Englebert, what are you? Some kind of expert witness?

What is going on here? actual discussion? This hasn't happened in about 7 years.

Holy crap, Bamatex! You put some effort into that.

Tell us what you read. All I have ever seen is that he voted for an en banc review of a gun ban case out of DC. Do you even know what that is or how he voted in the case?

Why doesn't someone post a link to a reputable source? Breitbart and hotair is the best you have? Talk about LIV! Jeez

YOU MISSED OUT!

But yet, you would vote for Trump. Do you know how easy it would be to post 10 crazy things he has said?