maniacalum2036
-
Posts
50 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by maniacalum2036
-
-
Yeah you could but you gotta take into account that Celina would've been scoring as well(like they were about to do on the first drive of the game) & their defense wouldn't of been on the field all game either.
Thanks! Will do.
1. Jack and KJ missing on a deep ball on the first drive.
2. Celina holding on a wide open receiver (forget who) in the 3rd Qtr.
3. Bogus turnover on downs in the 4th.
4. Clock ran out to end the game.
Hope their QB was worth about 40 pts.
-
Oh, so if we get to play "what if" with Celina, can I play what if with the 4 TDs that WO-S left on the field?
-
That's why you dont have starters padding stats in blowouts like Celina apparently did.
WO-S survived against PN-G last year with Will Johnson at QB.
-
Lol but you ftailed to mention he rushed for 153 along with 2 TD's point is with him being out it allowed WOS to key on the only other major offensive threat because the back up QB wasn't a threat to run or throw.
Youre the one who said not hard to key on the RB when they cant pass the ball.
He can have those 153 yards and 2 TDs, they still lose on friday.
-
Pingleton threw for like 70 yards in a shootout against Gilmer lol.
Alexander was the worry for me. That kid is huge, running behind a huge line. He had 220 yards and 3 TDs against Argyle in the regular season and 150 yards against Gilmer.
Anybody thinking their QB was gonna stand back there like Aaron Rodgers doesn't know what they're talking about.
-
Lol truthrlayed no-one during it's path to the state tourney and gotta gift in the state championship game cause the QB landed on his arm wrong first drive of the game which the WOS defense had nothing to do with BTW. However WOS fans have a hard time of seeing it this way for obvious reasons. Not saying you guys wouldn't of won if the QB didn't get hurt cause as I stated before the game I thought it would've been close however WOS fans seem to believe it wouldn't of been a close game and for that reason I can't respect you guys football knowledge. Celina beat Argyle earlier in the season, so according to WOS fans logic you guys would've ran through both teams on the opposite side of the bracket then correct? Smh delusional a$$ fans
Yeah i remember before the game you talking about Celina's QB being the difference maker.
Oh wait, nothing you said before the game actually happened.
-
Apparently, their entire defense got hurt in the first quarter as well?
Celina's size, physicality and equal (or better) athleticism was supposed to be too much for WO-S, but Jack Dallas and company ran up and down the field on them all day.
WO-S also dominated them at the line of scrimmage on both sides of the ball. The last sack of the game happened because Celina's huge RT got pushed back into the QB with a three-man rush.
Also, WO-S didn't even really use the vertical passing attack, which was supposedly "the only thing we could do".
- Mr. Buddy Garrity and kicker
-
2
-
It always happens? Just last year LaGrange and LaMarque were ranked higher than WO-S in the final poll and lost by a combined score of 76-7.
-
Look back at WO-S semi-final round history. None of these games really were for the weak of heart. 1986 New Braunfels, down 12-0 at the half with their running back Brad Grant, WO-S pulled it out in the 2nd half 28-12. Then '87 & '88 with Tivy, WO-S wins 21-7 and 28-14 I think. 2000 was Calallen, only last minute defensive stand and unbelievable go ahead TD. Forget that final score. Wimberly in '05 got out of hand in the 2nd half. Sinton hung tough last year till late. If you got some meds in the cabinet, line em up.
Final score of WO-S vs Calallen was 27-21.
Also, in the first half of that game, WO-S had a fumble recovery for a TD wiped out because of an inadvertent whistle. WO-S was given possession but missed a FG on the ensuing drive.
I don't know what would have happened if the 'Stangs had lost the game like that lol
-
Start getting those excuses ready.
-
WOS is monster, they're even more of a beast now because they'll never have to play teams like Navasota, Argyle, Graham, Carthage or Stephenville in the playoffs anymore. WOS is one of about 10 schools in the state that will always compete at a high level simply due to the level of talent they produce comparable to their classification.
Again... this was the original post referencing not facing teams because of the split. Not my argument.
The teams that WO-S lost to were just better. Lost to the eventual state champion 4 years in a row.
I also never said anything about enrollments. I don't have the numbers memorized off the top of my head, but the enrollments that I pulled up for last year had Crosby at 1500 and CP in the 1800s. Is that incorrect? Either way, last years champions Aledo and Ennis have enrollments comparable to Crosby.
-
playoff success or pre-district success? If we talking playoff success the same thing could be said about Wos "avoiding" playing Navasota or Henderson or El Campo due to the split to even get to a state title game using that supreme logic. UIL cant tell you who to play in the playoffs week by week to help you "avoid" teams. Some of you guys got yall lil pride stuck so far up yall arses that yall starting to say things on here that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
That point about not having to play certain teams due to the realignment was originally made by Crosby fan.
"WO-S is even more a beast because of talent produced by their size and not having to face Navasota, etc." or something like that. Which is true, I'm not disputing that.
I also understand the points about WO-S are just part of a larger argument to talk crap about the 5A schools in SETX.
I'm just saying the same is true about Crosby. Except they haven't really cashed in on that either.
Sounds like people are getting sensitive about Crosby. Which is strange for a school that's never won anything.
-
I got the point. It's the same in every post. Talent elsewhere is better than SETX, blah, blah, blah.
Because you're closer to Houston, you keep trying to align Crosby with Houston teams and other various current/former 5A teams that you've lost to over the years.
And until very recently you couldn't even beat the teams around here.
Everything you say about WO-S (or any other SETX school) is also true about Crosby. You produce a large amount of talent relative to your size, it doesn't translate beyond that. Crosby's success last year is also directly attributable to avoiding teams that were routinely beating you by 30 before.
And Crosby still lost big to a team that didn't even win the state championship. Probably gonna happen again this year.
But suddenly Crosby fans want to explain to everyone how football works. Lol.
- Pepper Brooks, griff, One4All and 2 others
-
5
-
-
I haven't seen anybody from WO-S bragging about "lining it up" against Navasota the way you're tossing around Ennis like it's an honor just to have Crosby mentioned in the same sentence with them.
Navasota was a 16-0 machine that won the state championship 39-3 over Gilmer.
Ennis was a 5-5 non-playoff team when they crushed y'all.
-
-
I'm not sure that 62-16 is considered "lining it up", but, ok
-
I think my reasoning was consistent. I said they loved the ball more effectively this year, the defense isn't as good but WOS only scored 7 offensive points on them last year. I think they'll manage more this year but so will Foster. Maybe the coach did say that, statistically it looks like Foster won too though. Not sure what other places he was talking about?
You keep saying "dominate WOS". I said Foster would be dominant at the line of scrimmage which would be expected playing a solid 5A team with 2000 kids.
You kind of proved my point though. If it's "giving them all they could handle" they're worried about then why did schedule Brenham, who they beat the year Brenham was a finalist? You don't play the game anymore because it doesn't benefit both teams equally, even at a neutral site.
You're right, I wouldn't mind seeing a WOS vs Crosby matchup. That's a big game for SETX fans though, there are probably 15 games we could play in the Houston area alone that would be bigger on a statewide scale. Not to mention a school like John Tyler or Ennis who we've already played in preseason before.
Oh yeah, I remember all of the statewide pundits couldn't stop talking about Ennis opening the season with a 62-16 win against a 6-5 Crosby team.
-
"You may have won this game, but you're not a state power!!... Also, you play in a weak district and won't beat Navasota, even though they're not in your division!!"
Oh. Ok then.
-
WO-S won two games last year with a WR (4th string QB?) taking snaps.
-
No problem, you should still be excited. It was Crosby only bi-district loss to y'all the last 7 years and y'all's only bi-district win the last 47 years I believe. You did something nobody else in your district has in nearly a decade.
Go Crosby!
Who is 'ya'll'?
Go Crosby
-
Ah, that's my bad.
Go Crosby^^?!
-
Hey now, I'm pretty sure that team was 7-3. No shame in bragging about that. I mean, Crosby beat a bunch of 3-loss and 4-loss teams in the playoffs last year before losing to one and it gets brought up in every thread.
-
First of all I didn't spell it like "playa" simply because PNG has idiot fans like Fox, who I'm sure uses all sorts of epithets when unfiltered, will go to his usual Barrett Station comments.
I'm saying that in nearly a decade what my initial post states is the case. It's been a good while since teams they played up and beat won a playoff game. That's not a shot at WOS at all, it's a logical sequence of events as you play up with a declining enrollment.
You're making my point as to why Crosby wouldn't play up. If we're getting tuned up by 21 by the top 5A teams around here why would we even need to step up, and trust me those are nothing compared to when we played Ennis.
WOS is monster, they're even more of a beast now because they'll never have to play teams like Navasota, Argyle, Graham, Carthage or Stephenville in the playoffs anymore. WOS is one of about 10 schools in the state that will always compete at a high level simply due to the level of talent they produce comparable to their classification.
Regardless of the opponent, if you've been beaten by them lately while playing up it hasn't turned out well that second weekend in November when you're likely to play a deeper team.
I understand the original post. You were saying that PN-G's season may not go well because of an early season loss to a lower team with new players.
Crosby has also been a direct beneficiary of realignment and talent relative to teams they won't have to face in the playoffs anymore. (WO-S has never played Argyle, Graham or Stephenville).
Like I said, don't really care about Crosby.
Anyway, to the game... the WO-S/PN-G series has produced two of the best HS games I've seen, in '89 and '98. (The last two were pretty good as well). If PN-G moves the ball like they did in the first half of last years game, could be big trouble for WO-S.
Celina Loss
in High School Football 2015
Posted · Edited by maniacalum2036
Haters and side chicks be mad about the same thing... no rings.