Jump to content

pngfan97

Members
  • Posts

    109
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by pngfan97

  1. [quote name="forthelove" post="1092384" timestamp="1319418404"]
    [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=90267.msg1092320#msg1092320 date=1319414995]
    [quote author=CH96 link=topic=90267.msg1092068#msg1092068 date=1319395741]
    Let's face it.  Lum W is not that good.  Should be an easy road for however has to play them.
    [/quote]

    I don't know if you are being sarcastic or you just have your head up your butt!  LUM W is 9-0 and beat an awesome BMT G team.  If you're not just trying to stir the pot a little bit then you are a ra-tard!
    [/quote]
    My thoughts exactly Smash! :o
    [/quote]

    Well, if you look at his response to my post, (his response in the middle of the quote) I think it's obvious he is just stirring the pot.  I don't think any level headed PeeWee football fan can say that LUM W is not a solid team.  We will find out who is the best soon enough!
  2. [quote name="CH96" post="1091777" timestamp="1319357246"]
    [quote author=sharkstooth link=topic=90267.msg1091149#msg1091149 date=1319315574]
    Soooo...now its for sure!  PNG GREY IS  the team to beat in the playoffs!  Beat PA; WOS and Lumberton!  I was hoping Beaumont Gold would hold their own...going into the playoffs!  But regardless PNG G has to much talent on both sides of the ball....
    [/quote]


    You beat average teams at best. Good luck.
    [/quote]

    Thats pretty funny.  Keep underestimating us.

    PF/PA
    png g----281-12
    lum w----265-73

    opponents above .500 through week 8
    png g----4 with combined record of 23-9 (PA,WOS,LUM R,BMT B)
    lum w----3 with combined record of 18-6 (PNG W,NED B,BMT G)

    I fail to see how your level of competition has been any higher than ours.  If nothing else (and I think most anyone not from png or lum will agree)  your level of competition has been lower.  I have no problem with someone thinking their team is the best.  I hope we all feel that way about our respective teams.  But at least be intelligent with your arguments.
  3. Just wanted to say congratulations to PNG G and LUM W for outstanding performances today.  I have to admit I was wrong about the LUM W outcome but completely on point about what they needed to do to win.  They controlled the line of scrimmage, contained #23, and tackled #11 when they needed it most.  Valiant effort from the youngsters from BMT G.  They will still make some noise in the playoffs and they will be a force next season.  I was impressed to see the kids from LUM R in person.  #9 is a beast on both sides of the ball, and #8 also played very well.  Those kids hit every bit as hard as everyone has talked about all year.  The Playoffs should be alot of fun.  Good Luck to all teams still in the hunt for the Super Bowl Championship.
  4. [quote name="LHSALLZONE" post="1086282" timestamp="1318884826"]
    jlh, good posts, some same kids i have thought of, plus# 3,11,23 of bmt -g they are awesome
    dont forget about those off. line # 70 from lum peewee red i know theres a few more on png-g ,quiet a few
    just didnt get all there #s i know # 22 or # 25 there qb is really good, he ran well against the pa game i saw
    [/quote]

    Our QB, #22, our RBs #20 & #8, and any of our starting OL or DL.  Plus all the other kids that were mentioned.  Several on WOS and PA.....Looking forward to seeing LUM R, LUM W, and BMT G in person on Saturday.  Been really impressed with the level of talent on the PeeWee side thus far.  We have many years of great SETX football ahead of us!
  5. It doesn't matter what kinda contest, we want to win.  Especially if we are going against Nederland.  If they had a competition to see who could throw the most rocks in a trash can from 25 feet away we would be out cheering our team to victory.  We want to be the best. At everything.  But if we can't be the best, we will usually settle for beating Nederland.
  6. [quote name="SmashMouth" post="1085941" timestamp="1318864894"]
    [quote author=demons95 link=topic=89960.msg1085922#msg1085922 date=1318864005]
    Nope not turning against Ocho but rest assure if it looks like a Red Raider and smells like a Red Raider its not a White Raider.
    [/quote]

    Bad thing is, Ocho looks like a White Raider, talks like a White Raider AND gets his feelings hurt like a White Raider...LOL.  The way he talks up Lum W, he may not be a coach, but he is definitely the President of the Olexa fan club...
    [/quote]

    ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

    Too funny!
  7. [quote name="WeedBegone" post="1085622" timestamp="1318816739"]
    PNG posters see a poll with PNG in it., They vote automatically for themselves regardless of content.  Winning a poll is even a big victory for them. 

    Best uniforms  ---PNG
    Best rest rooms---PNG
    Wildest women----PNG
    They cant help it.
    [/quote]


    Hahahahahahahahaha........ ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

    I do think it's crap that we aren't winning this poll by a bigger margin....
  8. [quote name="SmashMouth" post="1085708" timestamp="1318822276"]
    [quote author=Ochocinco link=topic=89960.msg1085677#msg1085677 date=1318819625]
    [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=89960.msg1085662#msg1085662 date=1318819047]
    [quote author=Ochocinco link=topic=89960.msg1085644#msg1085644 date=1318818185]
    [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=89960.msg1085624#msg1085624 date=1318816869]
    [quote author=Ochocinco link=topic=89960.msg1085582#msg1085582 date=1318814119]
    #3 up the middle isn't gonna work. So plan B is #23. Fast but small. I hope he can take a pounding. Far as #11, the qb, Its gonna Be a long day for him as well.
    [/quote]

    They will beat you outside.  Their #9 is good too.  By your own admission, LUM R has two outstanding players #8 and #9.  They beat them up the middle [u]and[/u] outside (mostly big plays outside).  I truly wish y'all the best, but in your division, they are the team to beat!  No disrespect to LUM W...they are really awesome.

    Bring your "A" game LUM W.  Y'all can definitely win, but don't take ANYTHING for granted.  BMT G is the favorite for a reason.
    [/quote]So why play the game? What would you do? Matter of fact, who so we need to stop and how would you stop them?
    [/quote]

    You play the game for 3 reasons:

    1. You owe it to your kids
    2. They are on the schedule...duh.
    3. Nothing is absolute...LUM W can win, they are just not the favorite.

    To answer your other question:

    If it were me coaching Lum White, I would do everything in my power to contain the outside.  Don't worry about punishing them...worry about catching them.  2 good corners is a necessity.  At least 1 if not 2 good LB's is too.  Put your fastest guys that can fundamentally pursue and tackle on the outside...they don't have to be your bruisers, they have to be your speed demons.  Your offense will be able to score on them...y'all have an excellent scheme with lots of misdirection (2 different offenses even).  Any weakness their offense has is compensated by sheer speed.  They will throw the ball some too, but (like every other Pee Wee team) they will run 80% of the time.  I am sure you have seen film on them, but you don't grasp their speed until they have burnt your best kids and are running into the endzone.
    [/quote]That does require alot of Tools. Tools that we may not have. We all know #3 is their Best player on both sides of the ball, and the others are all speed. Speed vs Discipline and Power. I don't think catching them will be a problem. Doing it for all 4 qtrs will be our biggest concern. We know how to win, Do they is the question
    [/quote]

    If you don't think catching them will be a problem, then you have already lost the ball game.  It is basically the ONLY problem.

    I think they DO know how to win...they've had a lot of practice at it this year and in FLAG.
    [/quote]

    Great point, SmashMouth......Oh, and Ocho, their success in FLAG was without #3........
  9. Ok, got a question of the playoff brackets.....It's my understanding that the matchups are:

    (Div 1) 1 vs (Div 2) 4
    (1) 2 vs (2) 3
    (1) 3 vs (2) 2
    (1) 4 vs (2) 1

    Now my question concerns the second round.....Is the playoff bracket set up like this:

    (1) 1 vs (2) 4
    (1) 3 vs (2) 2    winners of those games play

    (1) 2 vs (2) 3
    (1) 4 vs (2) 1  winners of those games play

    or

    (1) 1 vs (2) 4
    (1) 2 vs (2) 3  winners of those games play

    (1) 3 vs (2) 2
    (1) 4 vs (2) 1  winners of those games play

    Or are second round matchups determined after the first round games are completed?
  10. [quote name="Gusher" post="1074913" timestamp="1317926783"]
    [quote author=pngfan97 link=topic=89311.msg1074632#msg1074632 date=1317906788]
    BREAKING NEWS....Just talked to my buddy who's son plays for BMT-G and he says #3, 11, 23, and 7 are all out for the rest of the year do to emotional distress from all the hard hits they took last week.
    [/quote]
    I had heard from a buddy who heard it from his wife's hair dresser so you know it is true. That each of the players are reporting they are suffering from writters cramps and eye strains having to post and read how big and bad they are. JK I don't think kids at that age act as bad as us adults.
    [/quote]

    I KNOW kids at that age don't act as bad as adults!!!
  11. [quote name="Ochocinco" post="1074613" timestamp="1317905183"]
    [quote author=LHSALLZONE link=topic=89140.msg1074346#msg1074346 date=1317856406]
    actually, # 23 scored 2 off. & 1 def int. td & xtpt, #  11 scored  2 off. & 1 def. td & xtpt, # 3 scored 1 off td ( 2 extpt )
    bmt : offense  7 plays -  230 yds  ( 5 -td )  32 yds per carry  lol
          : 1 - fumble rec &  returned for td  - 85 yds  ( #  11 ) lum red drove 50 yds to 15 when fumbled )
            : 1-  int return for td 60  yds ( # 23 )

    total  yds - 375

    lumberton red # 9  19  carries -  127 yds ( 2 -tds -one for 38 yds )
                                5  rec.  -      45  yds
                                  2 ko retuns  42  ds
     
                          # 8  20 carries  -  113  yds ( 1 - td )
                                    5-7 passing -  45  yds
                                  1- xtrapt

    lumberton  red  39  carries -    240 yds ( 
                          5-7 passing        45 yds
                            3-ko returns      47 yds
                            first downs 10

    total yds                                332  yds

    bmt stopped 2 of our poss. on 4 downs, 2 on turnovers, we scored on the other 3 poss.
    oh - we did not stop them on off. lol :'(

    this is what we got off of the dvd
    by the way bmt -g can & does  play aggressive & they hit hard ,my son # 8  # his best buddy # 9 have the bruises to proove it.  again bmt great game & good luck. all those teams being mentioned both lum teams bmt -g wos, ned-b and png -g all are really good teams all can play, png-g is one of those impressive teams along with bmt-g, so im waiting to see who will
    topple one of those teams. not to leave lum-w out of the picture those guys are still undefeated to, i really like those guys. they are not as big along the line as in the past, maybe not as fast as last years sb team, but chris will always put up a good fight. good luck this weekend guys .
    [/quote]Those are nice numbers you put up against Bmt. Two backs over 100 yards rushing. 40 total carries between the two, I would've bet my bottom dollar that you won the game if I didn't already know the score. I don't understand how can you run the ball 40 X's successfully, and still managed to get blew out. If you controlled the game, how in the heck did you allow them to score 46 points
    [/quote]


    Well, when the other team runs somewhere in the neighborhood of 7 or 8 offensive plays and scores 5 times, plus adds 2 def touchdowns, it's kinda hard to win the game.
  12. [quote name="dogfather" post="1074588" timestamp="1317901971"]
    [quote author=pngfan97 link=topic=89311.msg1074581#msg1074581 date=1317900696]
    [quote author=dogfather link=topic=89311.msg1074511#msg1074511 date=1317871850]
    [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=89311.msg1074304#msg1074304 date=1317851235]
    [quote author=DawgsOfGold link=topic=89311.msg1074298#msg1074298 date=1317850983]
    [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=89311.msg1074251#msg1074251 date=1317848055]
    [quote author=dogfather link=topic=89311.msg1074243#msg1074243 date=1317847276]
    [quote author=DawgsOfGold link=topic=89311.msg1074114#msg1074114 date=1317837992]
    [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=89311.msg1073940#msg1073940 date=1317825807]
    [quote author=DawgsOfGold link=topic=89311.msg1073931#msg1073931 date=1317825143]
    Potential 1st Rnd Matchups:

    GAME 1: #1BMT G vs #4 Bmt B
    Game 2. #2 Lum W vs #3 Lum R
    Game 3. #1 Png G vs #4 Png W
    Game 4. #2 Wos vs #3 Ned B
    [/quote]Yall will not be picking Lum-R over white after PN-g Rolls threw lumbreton (plays all their kids for 2 full quarters) Sorry red ! No ofense .......They will roll -Here's the deal every time I have seen BMT play someone I have not really seen them pull off their dogs. Do to them not having a winning season in past yrs. They are ready for redemption! Understandable! But here is the Kicker PN-G is running it up not even trying. I know some of those kids over there. They are running away with it - with kids that will never touch the ball again Linemen 3rd&4th stringers. THEY ARE DEEP THEY WILL WIN SUPER BOWL !!!!The Dogfather said it first remember that. PEEWEE FANS and FANS OF ALL!

    Good work, now keep going.

    Bmt G beats Bmt G
    Lum W vs Lum R (give me your pick)
    Png G beats Png W
    WOS vs Ned B (give me your pick)
    [/quote]I'll take Lum R because u said they hit harder.
    [/quote]
    [/quote]
    I can see PNG G taking it all...what I was asking was the 1st round projected matchup of Lum R and Lum W.  White would appear to be the favorite...
    [/quote]This dude has jokes. We never call the dogs off. PLZ, we have Mercy Ruled every team we've played. Including the teams that are currently in the Top 5 power rankings
    Some by half-time, others a lil later. Can PNG G say that. Y'all put up 15 against P.A, OF did that. And every other team y'all played gives up 40 to everybody. I bet those 3rd & 4th stringers wont be touching the ball vs Wos and Lum R. And I guarantee you they wont be against us ;)
    [/quote]


    PA is a tough team.  We did what we needed to do to beat them.  No other game has been close, including our scrimmage of Ned B.  Had it been a full game it would have been ugly.  The test for us will be the next two weeks.  After that, we will know if our 3 pt win vs PA was the real deal.
    [/quote]When u scrimmage Ned B pngfan We had practice and at that point only really had one offense play down. I have been on here speaking out for yall and u go and say something like that.
    "COME ON MAN" Keep thinking if it came down to it yall would run threw Ned B!!! :-[
    [/quote]

    U think we had our full offensive playbook going at that point as well?  No disrespect to you guys, yall have a tough group.  I merely stated the fact that when we scrimmaged it wasn't close. 
  13. [quote name="dogfather" post="1074511" timestamp="1317871850"]
    [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=89311.msg1074304#msg1074304 date=1317851235]
    [quote author=DawgsOfGold link=topic=89311.msg1074298#msg1074298 date=1317850983]
    [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=89311.msg1074251#msg1074251 date=1317848055]
    [quote author=dogfather link=topic=89311.msg1074243#msg1074243 date=1317847276]
    [quote author=DawgsOfGold link=topic=89311.msg1074114#msg1074114 date=1317837992]
    [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=89311.msg1073940#msg1073940 date=1317825807]
    [quote author=DawgsOfGold link=topic=89311.msg1073931#msg1073931 date=1317825143]
    Potential 1st Rnd Matchups:

    GAME 1: #1BMT G vs #4 Bmt B
    Game 2. #2 Lum W vs #3 Lum R
    Game 3. #1 Png G vs #4 Png W
    Game 4. #2 Wos vs #3 Ned B
    [/quote]Yall will not be picking Lum-R over white after PN-g Rolls threw lumbreton (plays all their kids for 2 full quarters) Sorry red ! No ofense .......They will roll -Here's the deal every time I have seen BMT play someone I have not really seen them pull off their dogs. Do to them not having a winning season in past yrs. They are ready for redemption! Understandable! But here is the Kicker PN-G is running it up not even trying. I know some of those kids over there. They are running away with it - with kids that will never touch the ball again Linemen 3rd&4th stringers. THEY ARE DEEP THEY WILL WIN SUPER BOWL !!!!The Dogfather said it first remember that. PEEWEE FANS and FANS OF ALL!

    Good work, now keep going.

    Bmt G beats Bmt G
    Lum W vs Lum R (give me your pick)
    Png G beats Png W
    WOS vs Ned B (give me your pick)
    [/quote]I'll take Lum R because u said they hit harder.
    [/quote]
    [/quote]
    I can see PNG G taking it all...what I was asking was the 1st round projected matchup of Lum R and Lum W.  White would appear to be the favorite...
    [/quote]This dude has jokes. We never call the dogs off. PLZ, we have Mercy Ruled every team we've played. Including the teams that are currently in the Top 5 power rankings
    Some by half-time, others a lil later. Can PNG G say that. Y'all put up 15 against P.A, OF did that. And every other team y'all played gives up 40 to everybody. I bet those 3rd & 4th stringers wont be touching the ball vs Wos and Lum R. And I guarantee you they wont be against us ;)
    [/quote]


    PA is a tough team.  We did what we needed to do to beat them.  No other game has been close, including our scrimmage of Ned B.  Had it been a full game it would have been ugly.  The test for us will be the next two weeks.  After that, we will know if our 3 pt win vs PA was the real deal.
  14. [quote name="SmashMouth" post="1074169" timestamp="1317842179"]
    [quote author=pngfan97 link=topic=89311.msg1074165#msg1074165 date=1317841943]
    [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=89311.msg1074159#msg1074159 date=1317841374]
    [quote author=DawgsOfGold link=topic=89311.msg1074114#msg1074114 date=1317837992]
    [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=89311.msg1073940#msg1073940 date=1317825807]
    [quote author=DawgsOfGold link=topic=89311.msg1073931#msg1073931 date=1317825143]
    Potential 1st Rnd Matchups:

    GAME 1: #1BMT G vs #4 Bmt B
    Game 2. #2 Lum W vs #3 Lum R
    Game 3. #1 Png G vs #4 Png W
    Game 4. #2 Wos vs #3 Ned B
    [/quote]

    Good work, now keep going.

    Bmt G beats Bmt G
    Lum W vs Lum R (give me your pick)
    Png G beats Png W
    WOS vs Ned B (give me your pick)
    [/quote]I'll take Lum R because u said they hit harder.
    [/quote]

    LOL...good one.  What about WOS vs Ned B
    [/quote]

    WOS
    [/quote]

    I agree 100%...don't know about the 2 Lum teams though.  Both are good...but 1 is 4-2 and 1 is 6-0...should be the answer righ there.  Whatcha think?
    [/quote]

    IMO, I think this is a toss up.  Lum W barely got by Ned B, and other than that their schedule has been pretty easy.  Lum R lost to two very good teams in Bmt G and WOS.  Bmt G handled Ned B like they did Lum R, and it may come down to who has had more tests in the regular season.  If that is the case, I'm going with Lum R.  Plus they hit harder.
  15. [quote name="SmashMouth" post="1074159" timestamp="1317841374"]
    [quote author=DawgsOfGold link=topic=89311.msg1074114#msg1074114 date=1317837992]
    [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=89311.msg1073940#msg1073940 date=1317825807]
    [quote author=DawgsOfGold link=topic=89311.msg1073931#msg1073931 date=1317825143]
    Potential 1st Rnd Matchups:

    GAME 1: #1BMT G vs #4 Bmt B
    Game 2. #2 Lum W vs #3 Lum R
    Game 3. #1 Png G vs #4 Png W
    Game 4. #2 Wos vs #3 Ned B
    [/quote]

    Good work, now keep going.

    Bmt G beats Bmt G
    Lum W vs Lum R (give me your pick)
    Png G beats Png W
    WOS vs Ned B (give me your pick)
    [/quote]I'll take Lum R because u said they hit harder.
    [/quote]

    LOL...good one.  What about WOS vs Ned B
    [/quote]

    WOS
  16. [quote name="DawgsOfGold" post="1074114" timestamp="1317837992"]
    [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=89311.msg1073940#msg1073940 date=1317825807]
    [quote author=DawgsOfGold link=topic=89311.msg1073931#msg1073931 date=1317825143]
    Potential 1st Rnd Matchups:

    GAME 1: #1BMT G vs #4 Bmt B
    Game 2. #2 Lum W vs #3 Lum R
    Game 3. #1 Png G vs #4 Png W
    Game 4. #2 Wos vs #3 Ned B
    [/quote]

    Good work, now keep going.

    Bmt G beats Bmt G
    Lum W vs Lum R (give me your pick)
    Png G beats Png W
    WOS vs Ned B (give me your pick)
    [/quote]I'll take Lum R because u said they hit harder.
    [/quote]

    ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
×
×
  • Create New...