Jump to content

Lamar ESPN Bracket Buster Game


Lazeek

Recommended Posts

SATURDAY FEBRUARY 18TH
1 PM CT ESPN or ESPN2
Akron (14-7, MAC 6-1, RPI 58) at
Oral Roberts (20-4, Summit 12-0, RPI 49)

2 PM CT
Toledo (RPI 284) at
Sam Houston St. (RPI 291)

3 PM CT ESPN3
Lamar (13-8, SLC 4-3, RPI 119) at
George Mason (18-5, CAA 10-1, RPI 102)

3 PM CT
SE Missouri St. (RPI 271) at
McNeese St. (RPI 239)

3:30 PM CT
Central Arkansas (RPI 285) at
Louisiana Tech (RPI 190)

4 PM CT
Campbell (RPI 176) at
Northwestern St. (RPI 177)

6 PM CT
UT-San Antonio (RPI 182) at
Georgia St. (RPI 160)

6 PM CT
A&M-Corpus Christi (RPI 310) at
Central Michigan (RPI 255)

6 PM CT
Tennessee-Martin (RPI 314) at
Southeastern Louisiana (RPI 319)

6 PM CT
High Point (RPI 289) at
SFA (RPI 276)

7 PM CT ESPN3
UT-Arlington (15-5, SLC 7-0, RPI 136) at
Weber State (15-5, Big Sky 8-1, RPI 91)

7 PM CT
Texas St. (RPI 318) at
South Dakota (RPI 273)

TBA
IUPUI (RPI 274) at
Nicholls (RPI 309)

ESPN3 is a web based broadcast
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="AggiesWeAreNot" post="1168622" timestamp="1328032858"]
[quote author=LAZEEK link=topic=95130.msg1168242#msg1168242 date=1327955630]
Lamar will play George Mason on February 18th in the ESPN Bracket Buster Challenge.
[/quote]

This is b.s.  Why didn't we get a home game and some of the crappy slc teams did?
[/quote]
I think they randomly picked home/away teams earlier this year.  Next year George Mason will  be coming to Beaumont.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="AggiesWeAreNot" post="1168622" timestamp="1328032858"]
[quote author=LAZEEK link=topic=95130.msg1168242#msg1168242 date=1327955630]
Lamar will play George Mason on February 18th in the ESPN Bracket Buster Challenge.
[/quote]

This is b.s.  Why didn't we get a home game and some of the crappy slc teams did?
[/quote]


::)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would have been nice to get a home game, but I am happy with the outcome.  GM is a quality program and will becoming to Beaumont next year I believe (it might be another year or two).  If our attendance numbers were higher then I think we could get a home game easier and possibly a tv game in a few years assuming this bracket busters format continues.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="geezer" post="1168715" timestamp="1328040908"]
It would have been nice to get a home game, but I am happy with the outcome.  GM is a quality program and will becoming to Beaumont next year I believe (it might be another year or two).  If our attendance numbers were higher then I think we could get a home game easier and possibly a tv game in a few years assuming this bracket busters format continues.
[/quote]

With Lamar going on the road this year, LU gets to host a BracketBuster game next season.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="geezer" post="1168715" timestamp="1328040908"]
It would have been nice to get a home game, but I am happy with the outcome.  GM is a quality program and will becoming to Beaumont next year I believe (it might be another year or two).  If our attendance numbers were higher then I think we could get a home game easier and possibly a tv game in a few years assuming this bracket busters format continues.
[/quote]

ok.  that makes sense.  but, we aren't going to be any good next year.

I am glad we got George Mason as well.  They have an excellent basketball program so it will be a very tough matchup.  Plus, this is not a school we'd normally have a home and home series with.  Someone mentioned wanting La Tech.  I didn't want that.  I wouldn't mind playing them but they are a regional team that we can schedule any time.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="AggiesAreWe" post="1168250" timestamp="1327956085"]
[quote author=LAZEEK link=topic=95130.msg1168242#msg1168242 date=1327955630]
Lamar will play George Mason on February 18th in the ESPN Bracket Buster Challenge.
[/quote]

Will it be televised?
[/quote]It can be found on www.espn3.com, no other news yet.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am an optimist about what Coach Knight has accomplished with the MBB so far.  While we may be much less experienced next year I think saying we won't be any good next year is giving to much credit to this years senior class and not enough to the coaching.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • High Point walks it off.  Vandy Whistler headed home!
    • Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  
    • Wake is about to go from Preseason #1 to the 1st team eliminated 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...