Jump to content

Will Nederland Ever Go Deep In The Playoffs Again?

Guest Nederland Bulldogs

By Guest Nederland Bulldogs
in SETXsports Archived Threads

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Guest Penny

Guest Penny

Posted
Posted

Seems like you have an agenda when the first post you make on the site is... we gotta fire this DC and then everything will be fine.  Sounds like an agenda, plus it's against the site rules, plus it's idiotic, plus this is the same DC that spearheaded some of the most dominant Nederland defenses to take the field in the not too distant past.  I could plus you to death, but I agree with Brubaker, nice first post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pngfan1

pngfan1

Posted
Posted

Seems like you have an agenda when the first post you make on the site is... we gotta fire this DC and then everything will be fine.  Sounds like an agenda, plus it's against the site rules, plus it's idiotic, plus this is the same DC that spearheaded some of the most dominant Nederland defenses to take the field in the not too distant past.  I could plus you to death, but I agree with Brubaker, nice first post.

I agree, your coaches(notice its plural) have built a first class program. Changing anything would be crazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
smitty

smitty

Posted
Posted

Sorry to disappoint, but there is no agenda here.  The question was will Ned go deep into the playoffs.  Again, defense wins championships.  My opinion is the DC is the problem.  Do your home work and check the defensive standings over the past ten years.

That's just my opinion as what is needed to be done.  Now if this upsets your sensibilities and all you can do is state violations of site rules (show them to me) when opinions are stated, then you might want to go to a less sensitive site.

But I can also see why a png fan would want him to stay.  Maybe a hidden agenda there?  Just a thought for conversation. 

Seems like you have an agenda when the first post you make on the site is... we gotta fire this DC and then everything will be fine.  Sounds like an agenda, plus it's against the site rules, plus it's idiotic, plus this is the same DC that spearheaded some of the most dominant Nederland defenses to take the field in the not too distant past.  I could plus you to death, but I agree with Brubaker, nice first post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rollinac

rollinac

Posted
Posted

No one from the GT considers Dayton Local.  You guys have always been the enemy! ;D

I suspect one of the MC schools might have a run in a few years from all I have seen and heard of the 9th & 10th graders this year.

Lumberton could also with Crueder and that defense. Not sure about the offense, but defense wins more games in the playoffs.

Central is not done yet! Their Defense is quick.

Defense wins championships...the most overused, overhyped line in history.  Scoring more points than the other team wins championships.  Offense, defense, special teams...all crucial. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NHSBulldogFan

NHSBulldogFan

Posted
Posted

To answer the question i think Nederland will go deep in the playoffs in the next 2 to 3 years if not next year with the amount of talent we have coming up.I think the main problem with the defense is that we lack the size on the DL (atleast since Ron Mohica graduated) and were not getting good penetration which is why we gave up a ton of yards on the ground this year

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pngfan1

pngfan1

Posted
Posted

Sorry to disappoint, but there is no agenda here.  The question was will Ned go deep into the playoffs.  Again, defense wins championships.  My opinion is the DC is the problem.  Do your home work and check the defensive standings over the past ten years.

That's just my opinion as what is needed to be done.  Now if this upsets your sensibilities and all you can do is state violations of site rules (show them to me) when opinions are stated, then you might want to go to a less sensitive site.

But I can also see why a png fan would want him to stay.  Maybe a hidden agenda there?  Just a thought for conversation. 

Seems like you have an agenda when the first post you make on the site is... we gotta fire this DC and then everything will be fine.  Sounds like an agenda, plus it's against the site rules, plus it's idiotic, plus this is the same DC that spearheaded some of the most dominant Nederland defenses to take the field in the not too distant past.  I could plus you to death, but I agree with Brubaker, nice first post.

No agenda, this Indian just isn't afraid to admit Nederland has built a top notch program. One quite a bit better than ours. We are getting a new coach, hopefully our fate will change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NDNWarrior

NDNWarrior

Posted
Posted

I think Nederland will go deep in the playoffs again.  Neuman has built a strong base that continues to produce good athletes, along with his great coaching skills.  He has also surrounded himself by a good DC and OC.  Nederland will be back.  Congrats on a good year!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
football04

football04

Posted
Posted

You might see some defensive stats in the last 2 or 3 seasons that aren't that good, but I don't think you want to look back over the last 10 years, if you do you will see some outstanding defenses, from 97 to 2004 we played good defense, Several years as #1 in district, 04 was the last year we had the #1 defense in the district. 2000 was the best defense I've ever seen at Nederland, although my favorite was 04, no shock their.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
smitty

smitty

Posted
Posted

I've already said there is no agenda here.  Just the facts as I see them.  Defense usually gets you deep into the playoffs.  I'm just stating my opinion why a deep run will probably not happen.  But it won't be the players fault. 

When one can't deal with facts they usually scream "Agenda!"  I'm hearing that quite often.  These same might want to get on a site that facts won't get in the way.  Just my opinion.

Don't go to the stats 04, Smitty has an agenda to carry out, let him be about it.  Don't let the facts get in the way of his agenda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
smitty

smitty

Posted
Posted

PS - Just a thought for conversation.  Wasn't the DC in question on the staffs of DeRouen and August?  As the DC for DeRouen as I recall.  How were the defenses then?  Correct me if I'm wrong about the DC being associated with these two HC's.

I've already said there is no agenda here.  Just the facts as I see them.  Defense usually gets you deep into the playoffs.  I'm just stating my opinion why a deep run will probably not happen.  But it won't be the players fault. 

When one can't deal with facts they usually scream "Agenda!"  I'm hearing that quite often.  These same might want to get on a site that facts won't get in the way.  Just my opinion.

Don't go to the stats 04, Smitty has an agenda to carry out, let him be about it.  Don't let the facts get in the way of his agenda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
liltex

liltex

Posted
Posted

Sure they will.Lot's of great teams have come and gone and others will follow.Let me just point out last years Dayton team.Early we lose Cody Green(qb) to a leg injury for the year.Try A.J.Dugat for a game at qb-we lose 8-7 to lumberton.Up pops a QB who was not experienced w/Dayton's style of offense(New Orleans Katrina transfer)And he was magnificent in leading the Broncos to the state semi-finals against Austin Lake Travis.Gregory Charles threw for 1,800+ yds.and 22 or so td's w/4 pics.Amazing things happen sometimes when you think it will not.Good luck and find that magic again as you have certainly had some fantastic teams over there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
Matt

Matt

Posted
Posted

Nederlands defense is not what it used to be, i keep hearing about all these 2 and 3 year starting qb's but they never deliver, they have the luxury to play all the week teams first so they usually are 3-0 or 4-0 in district, then they go on a 2 or 3 game losing streak towards the end of the season

I have watched Nederland for about 15 years, 1 or 2 games a season, the defense used to punch you in the mouth, now they play soft

Link to comment
Share on other sites
smitty

smitty

Posted
Posted

Changes need to be made.  But will it happen?

Nederlands defense is not what it used to be, i keep hearing about all these 2 and 3 year starting qb's but they never deliver, they have the luxury to play all the week teams first so they usually are 3-0 or 4-0 in district, then they go on a 2 or 3 game losing streak towards the end of the season

I have watched Nederland for about 15 years, 1 or 2 games a season, the defense used to punch you in the mouth, now they play soft

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Brubaker

Guest Brubaker

Posted
Posted

Matt, I used to watch Dayton play and they were not impressive, we punched em in the mouth... they've had a run of great athletes under the SAME head coach... great athletes do wonders.  That's what Dayton has had, that's why they're beating the crap outta people.  It's pretty simple in High School football.  Matt, I got a VERY STRONG feeling that in a couple of years Nederland will be punching people in the mouth again...  especially the ones who are running it the most.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
texans

texans

Posted
Posted

Matt, I used to watch Dayton play and they were not impressive, we punched em in the mouth... they've had a run of great athletes under the SAME head coach... great athletes do wonders.  That's what Dayton has had, that's why they're beating the crap outta people.  It's pretty simple in High School football.  Matt, I got a VERY STRONG feeling that in a couple of years Nederland will be punching people in the mouth again...  especially the ones who are running it the most.

great athletes we have had a few, look over the last 4 years and who has more in college football, about the same i think

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Separation Scientist
      West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin leaves Democratic Party, registers as independent

      By Separation Scientist · Posted

      Exactly Lum. Right is still right regardless which way the wind blows. 
    • PhatMack19
      Road to Omaha

      By PhatMack19 · Posted

      High Point walks it off.  Vandy Whistler headed home!
    • Separation Scientist
      Bridgeland vs Tomball

      By Separation Scientist · Posted

      Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • UT alum
      America lost. The Kangaroo Court won.

      By UT alum · Posted

    • CardinalBacker
      America lost. The Kangaroo Court won.

      By CardinalBacker · Posted

      My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...