Jump to content

*Updated AP State Rankings*

KFDM COOP

By KFDM COOP
in SETXsports Archived Threads

 Share

Recommended Posts

KFDM COOP

KFDM COOP

Posted
Posted

Here is The Associated Press high school poll for Sept. 29, with

first-place votes in parentheses, records, points based on

10-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1, and the team's ranking in last week's poll:

Class 5A

School Rec Pts Prv

1. Euless Trinity (19) 4-0 199 1

2. Plano (1) 5-0 164 2

3. Southlake Carroll 3-0 147 4

3. Galena Park North Shore 2-0 147 3

5. Abilene 5-0 115 5

6. Odessa Permian 4-0 100 6

7. Spring Westfield 2-0 69 7

8. The Woodlands 3-0 52 8

8. Allen 4-1 52 9

10. Copperas Cove 4-0 25 -

Others receiving votes: Fort Bend Hightower 8, SA Madison 8,

Pearland 6, Garland Naaman Forest 3, Arlington Bowie 2, Odessa 1,

Flower Mound 1, Lufkin 1.

Class 4A

School Rec Pts Prv

1. Lake Travis (20) 5-0 200 1

2. Everman 4-0 166 2

3. Dallas Highland Park 4-0 156 3

4. Aledo 4-0 143 4

5. Port Lavaca Calhoun 3-0 99 5

6. Longview 4-1 90 6

7. Sulphur Springs 5-0 68 10

8. Dallas Carter 4-0 65 9

9. Ennis 4-0 39 -

10. Schertz Steele 4-0 22 -

Others receiving votes: Wolfforth Frenship 16, Friendswood 9,

Kerrville Tivy 9, Edcouch-Elsa 7, Texarkana 4, Texas City 3, El

Campo 1, Kilgore 1, Denison 1, Schertz Clemens 1.

Class 3A

School Rec Pts Prv

1. Liberty Hill (20) 5-0 200 1

2. China Spring 5-0 174 3

3. West Orange-Stark 2-0 148 4

4. Navasota 3-0 137 5

5. Waco La Vega 4-1 98 8

6. Gilmer 4-1 89 10

7. Abilene Wylie 3-2 78 9

8. Cuero 3-1 33 2

9. Burkburnett 5-0 32 -

10. Tyler Chapel Hill 4-0 19 -

Others receiving votes: Devine 15, Sealy 12, Bellville 11, La

Vernia 10, Giddings 8, Kennedale 8, Texarkana Pleasant Grove 7,

Celina 7, Sweetwater 5, Bridgeport 4, Zapata 3, Cameron Yoe 2.

Class 2A

School Rec Pts Prv

1. Cisco (19) 5-0 198 1

2. Arp 4-0 160 2

3. Hitchcock 2-0 137 3

4. Refugio 4-0 124 4

5. Kirbyville 3-0 115 5

6. Muleshoe (1) 5-0 91 9

7. Altair Rice 4-0 89 7

8. Blanco 5-0 49 -

9. Daingerfield 4-1 27 8

9. Crane 4-1 27 10

Others receiving votes: Corrigan-Camden 18, Pilot Point 13,

Grandview 11, Bushland 11, Idalou 9, Clyde 6, Brady 4, Elysian

Fields 3, Caddo Mills 2, Alpine 2, Harleton 2, West Rusk 1,

Crawford 1.

Class 1A

School Rec Pts Prv

1. Canadian (19) 5-0 199 1

2. Maud (1) 4-0 175 2

3. Roscoe 4-1 131 4

4. Itasca 5-0 126 3

5. Iraan 5-0 110 5

6. Bremond 4-0 77 7

7. Stratford 4-1 74 6

8. Shiner 4-0 58 9

9. Quinlan Boles 4-0 46 10

10. Cayuga 4-1 27 8

Others receiving votes: New Deal 17, Tenaha 11, Mart 11, Joaquin

8, Archer City 8, D'Hanis 8, Albany 6, Menard 6, Quanah 1, Simms

Bowie 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • 72 Pinto
      Bridge City is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • bullets13
      Bridge City is open

      By bullets13 · Posted

      I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • Eagles12
      Bridge City is open

      By Eagles12 · Posted

      He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • 72 Pinto
      LC-M is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
    • 72 Pinto
      Bridge City is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      Classic Bridge City.  Always someone else's fault, refs/umpires cheated, AD with an agenda, yada, yada, yada.  As far as I can tell it's damn near impossible to get fired at these schools so when someone does get fired, it's usually something.  Drama at Bridge City is a constant.  The guy did a good job coaching basketball and I'm sure he'll continue that somewhere else.  Time to move on.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...